T
TK421
Guest
Please pray for the dead who are not receiving proper funerals and the families.
Peace.
Last edited:
I think the situation doesn’t warrent the term ‘trying to curb expressions of grief’. We have the same situation in Australia where there are limits on the number of people who can attend a funeral. It’s unfortunate, but necessary.China Pushes for Quiet Burials as Coronavirus Death Toll Is Questioned - The New York Times
Please pray for the dead who are not receiving proper funerals and the families.
Peace.
There’s more to the story than the headline and subheadline have provided.I think the situation doesn’t warrent the term ‘trying to curb expressions of grief’. We have the same situation in Australia where there are limits on the number of people who can attend a funeral. It’s unfortunate, but necessary.
We also restrict weddings to the couple themselves, the priest or celebrant and two witnesses. Is that ‘trying to curb expressions of love’?
No doubt to make sure they are isolated from the rest of the population. I’d assume that whoever was taking the ashes was isolated to begin with.Freddy:![]()
There’s more to the story than the headline and subheadline have provided.I think the situation doesn’t warrent the term ‘trying to curb expressions of grief’. We have the same situation in Australia where there are limits on the number of people who can attend a funeral. It’s unfortunate, but necessary.
We also restrict weddings to the couple themselves, the priest or celebrant and two witnesses. Is that ‘trying to curb expressions of love’?
One of the writers of the article tweeted this out:
If only that were the officials’ only intention.No doubt to make sure they are isolated from the rest of the population. I’d assume that whoever was taking the ashes was isolated to begin with.
Yet the article quotes local Chinese newspapers reporting on events:Freddy:![]()
If only that were the officials’ only intention.No doubt to make sure they are isolated from the rest of the population. I’d assume that whoever was taking the ashes was isolated to begin with.
The tweet’s preview of the article also mentioned, “suppressing discussion of fatalities”.
This all comes off as “bury your dead safely. Oh, don’t forget to be quiet or else”. Imagine if that were done in America or Australia.
Lucky you. The NY Times article was and is behind a paywall for me and others.Yet the article quotes local Chinese newspapers reporting on events:
‘More recently, a truck driver cited in a report by Caixin, an influential newsmagazine, talked about dropping off thousands of boxes for storing ashes at Hankou Funeral Home, one of eight funeral homes in the city. While the numbers raised doubts about the death toll, it was unclear whether the boxes were used for just coronavirus victims or more broadly.’
If the local papers are reporting doubts about the deaths then I’m not sure that ‘suppressing discussion of fatalities’ is valid. In fact, it would tend to support a view that it’s false. Especially as you can sit at home wherever you are and read the paper’s story yourself using the link in that quote above.
Not for me. It says that on the front page but it still doesn’t work.Coronavirus coverage is free.
Well, that sums it up really. You can’t access the NYT report (that wasn’t the one to which I was referring). But you can access the report in the Chinese newpaper by clicking the link above (the word ‘report’ in blue).Freddy:![]()
Lucky you. The NY Times article was and is behind a paywall for me and others.Yet the article quotes local Chinese newspapers reporting on events:
‘More recently, a truck driver cited in a report by Caixin, an influential newsmagazine, talked about dropping off thousands of boxes for storing ashes at Hankou Funeral Home, one of eight funeral homes in the city. While the numbers raised doubts about the death toll, it was unclear whether the boxes were used for just coronavirus victims or more broadly.’
If the local papers are reporting doubts about the deaths then I’m not sure that ‘suppressing discussion of fatalities’ is valid. In fact, it would tend to support a view that it’s false. Especially as you can sit at home wherever you are and read the paper’s story yourself using the link in that quote above.
Since I found away to get that free access, this seems important:‘More recently, a truck driver cited in a report by Caixin, an influential newsmagazine, talked about dropping off thousands of boxes for storing ashes at Hankou Funeral Home, one of eight funeral homes in the city. While the numbers raised doubts about the death toll, it was unclear whether the boxes were used for just coronavirus victims or more broadly.’
How are these endangering public health?As China tries to control the narrative, the police in Wuhan, where the pandemic began, have been dispatched to break up groups on WeChat, a popular messaging app, set up by the relatives of coronavirus victims. Government censors have scrubbed images circulating on social media showing relatives in the city lining up at funeral homes to collect ashes.
Luckily, I just switched browsers.Well, that sums it up really. You can’t access the NYT report (that wasn’t the one to which I was referring). But you can access the report in the Chinese newpaper by clicking the link above (the word ‘report’ in blue).
I’ve just been standing by, mystified by the direction of the conversation. I was waiting for other people to point things out.How are these endangering public health?
You despatch police to break up groups on a social media app? That makes zero sense. It would be like the local boys in blue being sent out to break up the online poker game a few of us set up a couple of days ago.Since I found away to get that free access, this seems important:
As China tries to control the narrative, the police in Wuhan, where the pandemic began, have been dispatched to break up groups on WeChat, a popular messaging app, set up by the relatives of coronavirus victims.
For some reason that doesn’t sound likely. You took the first sentence of that quote from the NYT. Here’s the next sentence:It sounds more like that they were breaking up actual groups that had arranged to meet using that app.
How do these pictures pose a public health risk?Government censors have scrubbed images circulating on social media showing relatives in the city lining up at funeral homes to collect ashes.
They’re quite possibly showing people disregarding social distancing. Who knows. The Chinese government does exercise a great deal of control over what you can and can’t see and do on social media. One of the forum members who is living there was explained a couple of days ago that he can’t even access Youtube for example. This is not exactly breaking news…Freddy:![]()
For some reason that doesn’t sound likely. You took the first sentence of that quote from the NYT. Here’s the next sentence:It sounds more like that they were breaking up actual groups that had arranged to meet using that app.
How do these pictures pose a public health risk?Government censors have scrubbed images circulating on social media showing relatives in the city lining up at funeral homes to collect ashes.
For the same reason that pictures of people lining up for peanut butter cause a lot of people to go an start hoarding peanut butter. When people see that ashes are available and funerals allowed they will all go in an effort to finish their duty to their loved ones. In China, where media is controlled, they control media to control crowds. They don’t want lots of people in the same cramped funeral areas at once, so they manage it. You might object to the control of the media but the intention is really, really good.How do these pictures pose a public health risk?Government censors have scrubbed images circulating on social media showing relatives in the city lining up at funeral homes to collect ashes.