C
chevalier
Guest
Just a thought that’s crossed my mind when it was drifting. WARNING: Loose cannon syllogism alert. 
Basically, “choice to love” is not inconsistent with the soulmate theory. Ever seen how people “save it” for “the right one”? For example, they save themselves for the meaningful relationship and they don’t go on dates, they don’t get involved half-heartedly, do nothing an a trial basis and generally are reluctant most of the time. When they meet the right person (or *a *right person), something unlocks, the way you release a latch mechanism. The latch falls et voile, let loose the dogs of love! Eerr… Scratch the last one. Those people basically realise that they have met the person in whom they can invest all that they’ve been saving in terms of emotions, commitment, companionship and so on. What is that if not a choice?
Basically, “choice to love” is not inconsistent with the soulmate theory. Ever seen how people “save it” for “the right one”? For example, they save themselves for the meaningful relationship and they don’t go on dates, they don’t get involved half-heartedly, do nothing an a trial basis and generally are reluctant most of the time. When they meet the right person (or *a *right person), something unlocks, the way you release a latch mechanism. The latch falls et voile, let loose the dogs of love! Eerr… Scratch the last one. Those people basically realise that they have met the person in whom they can invest all that they’ve been saving in terms of emotions, commitment, companionship and so on. What is that if not a choice?