Chris Matthews says pro-life advocates use terrorist methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobzills
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bobzills

Guest
MSNBC Host Chris Matthews Says Pro-Life Advocates Use “Terrorist” Methods
“New York, NY (LifeNews.com) – Chris Matthews has been on the pro-abortion side of the debate since before his time as a top Congressional aide for abortion advocates. Now the MSNBC host has gone overboard by referring to pro-life advocates who oppose pro-abortion Health Secretary nominee Kathleen Sebelius as terrorists.”

lifenews.com/nat4880.html
A while back, Chris Matthews was invited by Holy Cross College to give the commencement address at graduation.
 
MSNBC Host Chris Matthews Says Pro-Life Advocates Use “Terrorist” Methods
“New York, NY (LifeNews.com) – Chris Matthews has been on the pro-abortion side of the debate since before his time as a top Congressional aide for abortion advocates. Now the MSNBC host has gone overboard by referring to pro-life advocates who oppose pro-abortion Health Secretary nominee Kathleen Sebelius as terrorists.”

lifenews.com/nat4880.html
A while back, Chris Matthews was invited by Holy Cross College to give the commencement address at graduation.
Orwellian.Pervert the language to condemn those you disagree with.
 
MSNBC Host Chris Matthews Says Pro-Life Advocates Use “Terrorist” Methods
“New York, NY (LifeNews.com) – Chris Matthews has been on the pro-abortion side of the debate since before his time as a top Congressional aide for abortion advocates. Now the MSNBC host has gone overboard by referring to pro-life advocates who oppose pro-abortion Health Secretary nominee Kathleen Sebelius as terrorists.”

lifenews.com/nat4880.html
A while back, Chris Matthews was invited by Holy Cross College to give the commencement address at graduation.
Who is a racist sexist homophobic terrorist?

Anyone who’s winning an arguement with a liberal.
 
I totally lost all respect for this man long ago. I wonder why he thinks killing the innocent unborn is not a terroristic act?. What else could we expect from a man who’s leg tingles at the sound of Obama’s voice.
 
Chris Matthews is clueless!

How does that statement even make any sense? pro lifers do not want babies killed so where and how does that make them terrorists. Who are they terrorizing? what an empty nonsensical statement.
 
I’m not condoning what he said, but haven’t there been instances of abortion clinic bombings and other types of violence done in the name of the pro-life cause?
 
These were horribly misguided individuals, not the pro life movement. Do not equate them as being the same. Pro-choice on the other hand, always culminates in murder.
 
These were horribly misguided individuals, not the pro life movement. Do not equate them as being the same. Pro-choice on the other hand, always culminates in murder.
I agree with you 100%, but those outside of the pro-life movement do not see it as such. Nearly every discussion I have with pro-choicers touches on this topic at some point.
 
It is an unfortunate tragic thing to note that on all sides of Political Debates, there are “terrorists”, people who so admitly disagree with the other side they will go to extreme lengths. But it does go Both ways and this is something this fella should admit. While some are extreme in the Pro-Life camp, many are likewise extreme in the Pro-Choice camp.
 
It is an unfortunate tragic thing to note that on all sides of Political Debates, there are “terrorists”, people who so admitly disagree with the other side they will go to extreme lengths. But it does go Both ways and this is something this fella should admit. While some are extreme in the Pro-Life camp, many are likewise extreme in the Pro-Choice camp.
I appreciate the point you are trying to make but these movements, pro-choice and pro-life, are not equivalent. The pro-life movement has been the most peaceful political movement in American history. Any claims to extreme violence are exaggerated, and in many cases, manufactured. For him to claim that substantive disagreement with a political nominee is tantamount to “terrorism” is dangerous to liberty and smacks of facism. :twocents:
 
Typical liberal argument.
It is all about character assassination of those deemed stupid and immoral enough to disagree with their position, nothing about actual argument as to why destroying human life is not a moral problem for them in the first place.
 
I appreciate the point you are trying to make but these movements, pro-choice and pro-life, are not equivalent. The pro-life movement has been the most peaceful political movement in American history. Any claims to extreme violence are exaggerated, and in many cases, manufactured. For him to claim that substantive disagreement with a political nominee is tantamount to “terrorism” is dangerous to liberty and smacks of facism. :twocents:
I agree on this.
 
I appreciate the point you are trying to make but these movements, pro-choice and pro-life, are not equivalent. The pro-life movement has been the most peaceful political movement in American history. Any claims to extreme violence are exaggerated, and in many cases, manufactured. For him to claim that substantive disagreement with a political nominee is tantamount to “terrorism” is dangerous to liberty and smacks of facism. :twocents:
religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
Im not sure how accurate those figures are but without a doubt the pro-life movement is not the most peaceful in history.
 
Let me at Chris Mathews! In 1979 at the age of 11 on a national radio talk show I embarrassed the president of Planned Parenthood with my question on abortion and turned every single caller after me as well as the host against him. I’d love to do something like that again.
 
religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
Im not sure how accurate those figures are but without a doubt the pro-life movement is not the most peaceful in history.
Remember who it is that compiles these statistics. i.e., not the pro life crowd. I have found that in issues such as this, the opposition does all it can to make pro life appear terrible. Ask one simple question. Take all these stats, instances, etc they listed and add them together. How does that compare to the many, many millions of abortions where the most defenseless and innocent of our society are torn and ripped apart in their being killed, and not one protest from these people about this. That is the response of a totally secular, humanistic culture.

I just came from a memorial service for some people who were killed in an accident , and it was started with “Star Track” music and a celebration of life centered around their favorite basket ball team. Do you think this would lend to an understanding on their part as to the horrors and pains suffered by and through abortion by these most of all ,these most innocent of children. In other words, consider the source. And Y’ALL, its growing.
 
religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
Im not sure how accurate those figures are but without a doubt the pro-life movement is not the most peaceful in history.
abortionviolence.com/0.HTM
abortionviolence.com/more.html

About those statistics you cited (which extend in the link below to 2008):

abortionviolence.com/0.HTM
The NAF shows a very impressive 147,867 incidents of “violence and disruption” during the time period 1977-2008, and members of the media often parrot this number unquestioningly, deliberately giving the false impression that thousands of pro-abortionists have been killed or injured in the noble performance of their duties.[14]
Now let us take a closer look at the NAF’s statistics;

128,690 (87.0%) of the NAF’s incidents of “violence and disruption” were picketing. Perhaps we should not be surprised that pro-abortionists lump picketing in with violent acts, since they believe that the “right” to abortion is so sacrosanct that it may not even be violated by people exercising their First Amendment rights. For example, the Feminist Majority Foundation (FMF) says that classic American means of public dissent are violent — but only if they are done by pro-lifers. The FMF classifies “home picketing” and “clinic blockades” [rescue missions] as “incidents of extreme violence.” The FMF’s Web site also identifies picketing and leafletting of abortionist’s neighborhoods as incidents of “violence.”[15]

12,563 (8.5%) of NAF’s listed incidents were “hate mail & harassing phone calls” or “e-mail/Internet harassment.” Many of these incidents are trivial indeed, because pro-abortionists are extremely paranoid and see any attempt to dissuade them from their deadly activities as violence. Some of the activities NAF undoubtedly includes in this category are Christmas cards from pro-lifers, because there have been incidents when pro-lifers have been arrested for sending such cards to abortion mills.[16]

Other categories that normal people would not consider deadly or extreme violence include “invasions” and trespassing (2,201); vandalism (1,353); and butyric acid (stink-bomb) attacks (100), for a total of 3,654 incidents.
This means that a total of 144,907 incidents listed by the National Abortion Federation, or 98.0 percent, are not violence at all.
But what about the other 2.0 percent of the incidents committed by pro-lifers? The NAF lists the following;

7 murders, which we are all familiar with;

17 attempted murders;

4 cases of kidnapping;

216 arsons and bombings of abortion mills. According to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), there have been 169 arsons and bombings of abortion mills since 1982, and only 77 of these have been solved.[17] This strongly implies that many of the acts of violence committed against abortuaries are “inside jobs.”
BATFE statistics show that a total of $1,009,050 in damage was done to abortion mills by bombers during the five-year period 1993-1997, and seven people were injured. By comparison, during the same period, more than a thousand bombings killed 47 people, injured 1,224, and caused more than half a billion dollars of damage at commercial enterprises. At schools, bombings injured 127 people. Mailbox bombs killed forty people. Thirteen people were killed and 74 more injured when they were bombed in their cars.[18]
So why do we only hear about the bombings of abortion mills in the media?
It seems the media and liberals care much more about abortion mills than they care about synagogues and churches. The National Church Arson Task Force (NCATF) of the BATFE and the FBI has documented 827 actual and attempted arsons and bombings of churches and synagogues during the period January 1, 1995 to October 5, 1999.[19] Compare this to the NAF’s number of 61 actual and attempted arsons and bombings at abortion mills during the same period.[20] In other words, for every abortion mill that is torched, fourteen churches and synagogues burn. And what do we hear the most about? That’s right. The abortion mills.
Pro-abortionists attempt to implicate the entire pro-life movement when an abortuary burns, and shout endlessly about some vast, organized “anti-choice” conspiracy, but an expert from the BATFE has said that “Overwhelmingly, the fires tend to be the work of a loner. A lot of these people convicted have never had any visible or traceable connection to anti-abortion activity. … [Investigators have uncovered] no sign of support from anti-abortion organizations for this kind of activity. Many of the bombers rejected the organization. They thought of it as weak, impotent, not serious-minded. These are the kinds of things you hear when you talk to them.”[21]

96 attempted bombings and arsons (the vast majority of which are unsolved, but attributed to pro-lifers anyway);

657 anthrax threats, the huge majority of which were committed by a single individual, Clayton Lee Waagner, who, by the way, also targeted pro-life crisis pregnancy centers;

169 cases of assault and battery, which is a dubious claim at best (does any pro-lifer know one of his friends who has ever been convicted of an actual assault?);

1,028 death and bomb threats; and

506 cases of stalking (the definition the NAF gives for “stalking” is the “persistent following, threatening and harassing of an abortion provider, staff member, or patient away from the clinic.” Once again, the definition is very vague, and there have been only a handful of pro-lifers actually convicted of this offense).
 
religioustolerance.org/abo_viol.htm
Im not sure how accurate those figures are but without a doubt the pro-life movement is not the most peaceful in history.
And here: 🙂

afterabortion.org/jama.html
"The AMA Council’s review of immediate post-abortion complications is even more myopic. The Council deferentially turns to the National Abortion Federation (NAF) for data. The NAF, in turn, graciously supplies an estimate of one complication per 1000 abortions via a memo between the two advocacy groups. But even here, the abortionists can hardly avoid tripping over their own tongues. The same NAF letter which says the total complication rate is 1 per 1000, says that incomplete abortions occur at a rate of 2.3 per thousand, infections requiring intravenous treatment occur at 1.3 per 1000, perforation of the uterus .9 per thousand, and other problems requiring laparoscopy, laparotomy or transfusion occur at 1.1 per thousand, which together would total 5.6 per thousand - far more than the original “total complication rate” of 1 per thousand.

One is also left to wonder how the NAF has compiled these undocumented statistics, especially given the evidence that most injured women go to someone other than the abortionist for treatment because they are filled with shame, anger, and revulsion toward the abortionists.

But even on the face of it, asking the National Abortion Federation (NAF) for complication rates is like asking the American Tobacco Association for their estimate of the health impact of smoking. The only explanation for this deference to the NAF is the fact that the AMA Council is philosophically aligned with the NAF and therefore the NAF trade figures are servilely accepted as gospel."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top