Christian Crusader threats, again.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hadith
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does not anyone else find it offensive that a spy is here on forum?

NOPE
 
40.png
Hadith:
So you admit you are spy?

Does not anyone else find it offensive that a spy is here on forum?
It’s like listening to Michael Moore. 😦
 
40.png
StMarkEofE:
I for one am not fooled into thinking that Muslims of the world are peaceful. “For they shall be know by their deeds.” For the Muslim, it is their sworn duty to spead their gospel, the Quran, and subject or eliminate those who do not submit to its teachings.

Love thy neighbor or turning the other cheek is unknown in the Quran. Their book does not tell us to Love but to submit. This is the most significant difference between the Bible and the Quran.

👍 👍 👍

Islam is simply a sub-Christian ideology - it reminds of me of Communism; and not just because both are bloody and murderous. ##
 
40.png
Hadith:
40.png
eleusis:
Yup.

Know thy enemy. And militant Islam is the enemy. Are you a militant?

And the Congress charged the DIA with running the only graduate level intelligence program in the nation. A program run behind locked doors, under code word level secrecy protection.\QUOTE]
So you admit you are spy?

Does not anyone else find it offensive that a spy is here on forum?
An intelligence analyst is not the same as a spy. That being said though, I recognize the need for our country to employ spies to protect out vital national interests. I fully support our brave spies in their efforts to prevent another 9/11 attack by hypocritical Islamic militants.

Let’s face it Mohamed was a petty warlord in a pagan region who used religion to manipulate idolatrous tribesmen into uniting under his banner. After his death opportunists seized power and a bloodthirsty caliphate went out to conquer the world. Their inability/unwillingness to modernize finally led to them decline to irelevance. Petroleum based econimic expansion later gave them money and they decided to try and be conquerors again. They failed miserably in their assaults on Israel and now once again use religion to manipulate primitive tribespeople into blowing themselves up to achieve civilian casualties all the while those who hold power in these nations continue to drunkenly party with pornography and drugs and worse, rape captive women and children. Now is that a religion of peace? was it ever? It is the basest of humaqn nature rationalized by the trappings of manmade religion.

We must be prepared to do as we must to defend ourselves against the threat the paynim.
 
Christians need to rally against Islam before it is too late.

Demetrios
 
Let Christians and Muslims both rally together against atheistic secularism - our common foe.
 
40.png
tjmiller:
Let Christians and Muslims both rally together against atheistic secularism - our common foe.
am not sure if aitheist want to dominate you and later impliment on you the beautiful sharia. It is the european and American and Canadian and Australian governments that must stop muslim immigration; if they love islam and sharia, let them apply it in their own lands
Satan’s technique is to fool you by being nice to you and providing you with what you need until you surrender to him to an eternal damnation.
 
Is Muhammad the false prophet in the bible?

Did Jesus not say that there would be no other prophets after me?
 
JamesG said:
Is Muhammad the false prophet in the bible?
why are you blaspheming :mad: lool
Did Jesus not say that there would be no other prophets after me?
there is no one after Jesus ( surely not someone like mohammad!!) : he fulfilled everything and He is the one who will come back 😉
 
Jesus never said there would be no prophets after Him.
Mohamet just isn’t one of them.

But better a sincerely mistaken Totalitarian Theism, than rule by the Enemies of God.
 
tjmiller said:
Jesus never said there would be no prophets after Him.
indeed, but who needs someone beside Jesus ❤️
Mohamet just isn’t one of them.
surely not! he is the opposite of Jesus in life and teachings.
But better a sincerely mistaken Totalitarian Theism, than rule by the Enemies of God.
i respect your opinion, but living with them, i’d never choose their sharia which is implimented whether you like it or not; as if God is totalitarian.
 
40.png
tjmiller:
Jesus never said there would be no prophets after Him.
Mohamet just isn’t one of them.

But better a sincerely mistaken Totalitarian Theism, than rule by the Enemies of God.
I would call fanatical, militant followers of a false prophet with a long history of killing Christians enemies of God. I would rather be opposed by those who do not recognize a higher power than by those who commit murder in the name of a false one. (not to mention that whole organized effort thing)
 
40.png
demetrios1973:
Christians need to rally against Islam before it is too late.

Demetrios
How do you propose to bridge the gap between denominations and between liberals who feel there is no threat and foist multiculturalism which says there IS NO REASON to rally because Islam or Christianity either one is equally fine for no one culture is worth fighting for?

What proposal might you have to share?
 
40.png
eleusis:
How do you propose to bridge the gap between denominations and between liberals who feel there is no threat and foist multiculturalism which says there IS NO REASON to rally because Islam or Christianity either one is equally fine for no one culture is worth fighting for?

What proposal might you have to share?
as long as the quran is there? seems pretty impossible; Islam= dinun wa dunya : religion and life ; there is no separation between religion and state
 
40.png
tjmiller:
But better a sincerely mistaken Totalitarian Theism, than rule by the Enemies of God.
Who said that Muslims are not the “Enemies of God” too?

Who are the “Enemies of God”?
 
40.png
Hadith:
Let me to understand this correctly, on another thread we have a pleasent talk about Islam and here we see a Christian response.

This is the typical response we Muslims must live with day and day.

First fear that our fertile women and virile men make more babies than the Christians do. There is no crime in this. And this is winning the land where we make babies. If I make more babies than you I am more than you and your voice is silenced. I win. We win. Islam WINS. Yes?

In a democratic land like Italy when we have more babies than the Italians do then we have more votes, yes? No? Of course yes. Then we will vote to cut off the pimple on the map of Rome and let it starve on the vine. No more money from the Islamic people of Italy. This is all peaceful yes? Then why is the above Christian saying we Muslims will be blown to bits?

And next we have a threats from the FBI to investigates me? Why? Because I speak my mind? This is not allowed now that it offends a Christian? Is this not the whole discussion now in Europe with the horrid cartoons of Muhammad? So it is ok for you to protest me and my speak but we cannot protest to defend our faith? Is this example of Christian love?

And finally the ultimate card is played. The Crusade threat against Islam again? This is not peace loving. This is not turning your next cheeck.

Please, go to Barnes and Noble and buy a copy of the Koran. Come reason with us, let us discuss your conversion to the religion of peace. It is clearly more rational than your above example of how a Christian is to behave.

Peace
Not for nothing but it appears you are unfairly quoting these peoples’ posts out of context. It looks as if they were responding to a Muslim stating how they will take over Christian lands primarily Italy and Rome. Quoting out of context across topics is a bit dishonest.

But if I needed to free Christian lands from Muslim invaders whose Koran clearly states we are to be converted by the sword, or have Dimitude put in place so we know we’re subjated, I wouldn’t hesitate to give my life. Muslim’s cry foul over the Crusades but neglect the 100 of battles Muslim’s waged against Christians’ prior to the Crusades.

If you want a serious dialogue, stop with using one post that was obviously used out of context to label all of Christendom. No one will take you serious that you just want a dialougue, and not a fight…
 
Forget about the crusades, let’s talk about what happened after the crusades. When the West stopped fighting the Saracens, the Saracens continued to threaten the West on and around the Med. So, who were the aggressors here? This Saracen threat led to the Battle of Lepanto and finally the collapse of the Saracen empire.

It was a humiliating defeat though. The Turkish fleet suffered the loss of about 180 galleys and 60 galliots. However, only 117 galleys and 13 galliots were in good enough condition for the Christians to keep. On the Christian side 15 galleys were destroyed and 30 damaged so seriously that they had to be scuttled. One Venetian galley was the only one kept by the Turks. All others were abandoned by them and recaptured.

The Holy League had suffered around 9,000 casualties but freed twice as many Christian prisoners. Turkish casualties were around 30,000.

Why don’t you guys ever talk about Saracen aggression? It’s always the West, the Jew, the American, the crusade this and that. It’s getting old.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top