W
WackBob
Guest
I think what celticsfan1983 was getting at is that nobody really “defines” what punk is but Christian punk would be refusing to conform with the ways of the world, pop cult, etc.
To say that to be a punk you have to have no leader or you have to be anarchist or you have to conform to some rules even if they’re nonconformist rules is an oxymoron in it’s self. Of coarse then you could say anybody is punk but I wouldn’t take it that far. Catholacism generally doesn’t conform with society and if you like punk rock than I guess the possibility of a “Christian Punk” is feasable.
To say that to be a punk you have to have no leader or you have to be anarchist or you have to conform to some rules even if they’re nonconformist rules is an oxymoron in it’s self. Of coarse then you could say anybody is punk but I wouldn’t take it that far. Catholacism generally doesn’t conform with society and if you like punk rock than I guess the possibility of a “Christian Punk” is feasable.