Hi
Jesus said he was Son of Man, in his second symbolic coming he would be Son of Man; the rest is creeds inducted by Paul ,at Rome, an enemy of Jesus and his followers. This has got nothing to do with Jesus. This is my cofirmed opinion, others are welcome to differ with me with reasons and rational arguments.
St. Paul the Apostle spoke about Jesus killing on Cross in 1 Cor 15:
[17] If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.
[18] Then those also who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished.
Jesus also reaffirmed that he was the “Son of the living God.” [Matthew 16:16-17] He further indentified himself as the I Am of the Old Testament: Compare Exodus 3:14 to John 18:4-6.
If Paul was an enemy of the Faith, why did he subject himself to threats, floggings, constant persecution, and an eventual martyrdom for the sake of Christ? Why did he encourage the Church, if he still sought to destroy it? Your reasoning is devoid of logic.
Paul wrote those letters not to say the Faith is a farce. He said, “IF Christ didn’t really rise …” What’s he’s saying is that we should be fully reassured that he did, or else the Faith is meaningless. Paul himself continued his mission long after this statement was made. Clearly, he himself believed in the Resurrection, which his letters constantly reaffirm.
Now, in my opinion, as you know that Jesus was not killed on Cross, so according to Paul, Catholic viewpoint is not proved; needs to be revised.
I think the Bible and any given history book will be in union in reporting that indeed, Christ was crucified and died. The Islamic faith (which you are not a part of, despite all your assertions to the contrary) merely masks this fact in order to declare the preeminence of Mohammed as its prophet. After all, Christ couldn’t have done something
he didn’t! That’s what concerns modern Moslems, just as it did the constructors of the Qur’an. I find it far from admirable to blot out such a crucial part of history in order to justify your religion.
You should look at the faulty nature of your rebuttals, friend.
Shalom!