"Christianity is not a religion" by some Protestants

  • Thread starter Thread starter souldiver
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It depends on how one defines religion, and there is considerable debate about that. Under one umbrella definition that would include ritual intended to bridge the divide between man and the divine or spiritual, then Christianity isn’t a religion, simply because Jesus accomplished and fulfilled the ritual and is currently the living bridge. Hence, it is all focused on relationship now, as the building and maintaining of the bridge via ritual has already been accomplished and we relate, not via ritual, but by Jesus Christ, Who is a Person, hence Relationship.

However, if one describes religion as a way of living life and a spiritual belief, morals, and faith, then of course Christianity fits in that umbrella definition. So, my answer is “yes and no.”
The problem is that people who make this dichotomy actually have ritual in their churches on a regular basis, such as the Lord’s Supper, baptism, a repeated order to worship service, and so on. It’s as if they really don’t believe–in practice–what they’re saying.
 
The problem is that people who make this dichotomy actually have ritual in their churches on a regular basis, such as the Lord’s Supper, baptism, a repeated order to worship service, and so on. It’s as if they really don’t believe–in practice–what they’re saying.
Huh? Life is full of ritual if by ritual you mean anything done repeatedly according to a prescribed order in a solemn manner. I perform a ritual every morning–it’s called brushing one’s teeth. LOL

Nevertheless, I do not base my salvation on the efficacy of my tooth brush. That’s the difference.

I do not base my salvation on whether I undergo the ritual of baptism–even though baptism is an important part of becoming a Christian. I am saved by grace through faith in Christ’s death and resurrection. The moment I placed my faith in Christ occurred nearly 8 years before I was baptized, and yet I lived those 8 years as a committed and practicing Christian. 🤷

Should I have been baptized sooner? Yes. Still, I had faith in Christ as my redeemer. I repented of my sins. I prayed and sought God’s will for my life in His word. I was more of a Christian than many people I knew who were baptized–who felt no conviction for the sin in their life and did not attend church regularly.

Should a Christian be baptized? Yes. Is it possible to be a Christian without water baptism? Yes, since baptism (like circumcision) is primarily a matter of the heart, by the Spirit and not the letter (Romans 2:29).
 
The problem is that people who make this dichotomy actually have ritual in their churches on a regular basis, such as the Lord’s Supper, baptism, a repeated order to worship service, and so on. It’s as if they really don’t believe–in practice–what they’re saying.
As Itwin explained, there is a difference. That is why there is a linguistic choice in saying “sacrament” or “ordinance” or “liturgy” or “meeting” or “service” etc… and what all of that means.
 
Huh? Life is full of ritual if by ritual you mean anything done repeatedly according to a prescribed order in a solemn manner. I perform a ritual every morning–it’s called brushing one’s teeth. LOL
Yes, but keep in mind that when some people speak of this idea of Christianity being only a relationship and not a religion, they are speaking against the idea of empty ritual, going through the motions, etc. For those people, they have just as much a problem with their own church’s worship practice as they do with other churches.
Nevertheless, I do not base my salvation on the efficacy of my tooth brush. That’s the difference. I do not base my salvation on whether I undergo the ritual of baptism–even though baptism is an important part of becoming a Christian. I am saved by grace through faith in Christ’s death and resurrection. The moment I placed my faith in Christ occurred nearly 8 years before I was baptized, and yet I lived those 8 years as a committed and practicing Christian. 🤷
Your personal experience really does not carry any authority for what Christians are to believe–I hope you realize that. What matters is what Scripture teaches on baptism. In Rom. 6:4, Paul specifically says that we are buried with Christ through baptism, and in the Greek, the grammatical construction unmistakably indicates instrumentality, thus teaching that baptism is the means by which we are buried with Christ.
 
The times I’ve heard it used, the gist was that ‘religion’ is seen as something negative – a ‘work’ of man, rather than something given by God – and therefore, the assertion isn’t so much about what Christianity isn’t, but what it is.

The assertion seems like a trivial exercise in semantics to me… 🤷
I agree. There’s Contemporary song that addresses this (and of course I can’t remember it) but in essence it’s saying that the life we live as Christians should not be a religion but a relationship.

Blessings!

Rita
 
It depends on how one defines religion, and there is considerable debate about that. Under one umbrella definition that would include ritual intended to bridge the divide between man and the divine or spiritual, then Christianity isn’t a religion, simply because Jesus accomplished and fulfilled the ritual and is currently the living bridge. Hence, it is all focused on relationship now, as the building and maintaining of the bridge via ritual has already been accomplished and we relate, not via ritual, but by Jesus Christ, Who is a Person, hence Relationship.

However, if one describes religion as a way of living life and a spiritual belief, morals, and faith, then of course Christianity fits in that umbrella definition. So, my answer is “yes and no.”
It really is a matter of semantics I think as one might see religion as just a “show” - getting up, going to church, going home and go back to your life without making an effort to walk with God during the week. I say it’s more than a religion as well…How can I call myself a Christian if I’m not going to take what I learn in church and Bible studies and allow myself to use it in my daily walk with Jesus…

In Christ,

Rita
 
Yes, but keep in mind that when some people speak of this idea of Christianity being only a relationship and not a religion, they are speaking against the idea of empty ritual, going through the motions, etc. For those people, they have just as much a problem with their own church’s worship practice as they do with other churches.
Well, there are people who refuse to belong to any church, but that has more to do with refusal to submit to authority. I am sure there are people who reject any kind of “program” but I have never met a Protestant who rejected on principle any kind of order to a service. That would be untenable in the long run because any time people come together there must be some kind of internal order.

And I am a Pentecostal, so our liturgy is as chaotic as it gets.
Your personal experience really does not carry any authority for what Christians are to believe–I hope you realize that. What matters is what Scripture teaches on baptism. In Rom. 6:4, Paul specifically says that we are buried with Christ through baptism, and in the Greek, the grammatical construction unmistakably indicates instrumentality, thus teaching that baptism is the means by which we are buried with Christ.
You don’t have to agree with my “personal experience.” I look to Scripture, which is why I reject the notion that baptism is what saves. I have to go to a church event now, but I can elaborate later here or on another thread.
 
Yes, but keep in mind that when some people speak of this idea of Christianity being only a relationship and not a religion, they are speaking against the idea of empty ritual, going through the motions, etc. For those people, they have just as much a problem with their own church’s worship practice as they do with other churches.
And because we are buried with Christ, we will rise with Christ. That’s the important part.

“Don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were therefore buried with him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life.” (Romans 6:1)
 
What, Vanez??? Do you not believe the “Gospel of Facebook?” LOL

Peace!

Rita
Ahahahaha 😃 crazy things going on on facebook. I don’t have facebook account, though.

When I sat at elementary school, my teacher once said,“actually, Christianity (Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox) is not a religion. It’s a relationship” — I agreed with her
 
I believe that Christianity is a religion. Whether the different denominations within Christianity are seperate religions is a more difficult answer. In the end, I choose to believe not, for the sake of unity and one Church who embraces all Christians as brothers, even if they have degrees of Communion. We all have degrees of Communion, even among us practicing Catholics!

Do the Evangelicals who demonize the term ‘religion’ have a valid point? No primarily, yet yes according to their view. Fortunately, Truth is not relative to the Evangelicals defining.

I try to agree with as much as possible with seperated brothers in the faith. Our religions goal is a relationship to God. But this was not our doing. God chose out of His good Will to establish a relationship with man. We have the opportunity to make it a good and healthy relationship or a poor relationship (a curse over us). The blood of Jesus is over mankind! We either participate in His life, or we accept the condemnation which He gives.

Our religion reveals a relationship which was established many times over throughout our history with God. There was a first Covenant, which proved to reveal we are condemned by it, and then their is the New Covenant, which revealed that God made possible our sonship to Him and so heirs of His glory!
 
Well, there are people who refuse to belong to any church, but that has more to do with refusal to submit to authority. I am sure there are people who reject any kind of “program” but I have never met a Protestant who rejected on principle any kind of order to a service. That would be untenable in the long run because any time people come together there must be some kind of internal order.
Of course they don’t reject to any order of service. They (meaning the people I was referring to earlier, not necessarily Pentecostals) don’t see anything wrong with it because they don’t see it as ritual, but it is. That’s the irony.
You don’t have to agree with my “personal experience.” I look to Scripture, which is why I reject the notion that baptism is what saves. I have to go to a church event now, but I can elaborate later here or on another thread.
Thanks. I’d be interested in your response to what I wrote about Rom. 6:4, namely:

" In Rom. 6:4, Paul specifically says that we are buried with Christ through baptism, and in the Greek, the grammatical construction unmistakably indicates instrumentality, thus teaching that baptism is the means by which we are buried with Christ. "
 
“It’s not a religion, it’s a relationship.” “As long as you accept Jesus as your personal lord and savior you’re saved.” “It’s only about me and Jesus”

Those ideas are completely absurd, but on the bright side, these non-denominational evangelical fanatics and their false doctrines will be the end of Protestantism.
 
“It’s not a religion, it’s a relationship.” “As long as you accept Jesus as your personal lord and savior you’re saved.” “It’s only about me and Jesus”
This is essentially what Luther and others called “enthusiasm.”
Those ideas are completely absurd, but on the bright side, these non-denominational evangelical fanatics and their false doctrines will be the end of Protestantism.
Not necessarily. While it’s true that it’s this kind of error (among others) that turned me away from evangelicalism, it did not drive me away from Protestantism. I ended up Lutheran. (However, on the way I did an intense, in-depth exploration of the RCC and EOC.)
 
This is essentially what Luther and others called “enthusiasm.”

Not necessarily. While it’s true that it’s this kind of error (among others) that turned me away from evangelicalism, it did not drive me away from Protestantism. I ended up Lutheran. (However, on the way I did an intense, in-depth exploration of the RCC and EOC.)
From an eagle-eye perspective, you’ve moved from

CatholicModern Protestantism

to

CatholicProtestant-LutheranismModern Protestantism

not to mention, many confessional Lutherans - especially on this site, claim to be Evangelical Catholics and even closer to Catholicism than mainline-Lutheranism.
 
From an eagle-eye perspective, you’ve moved from

CatholicModern Protestantism

to

CatholicProtestant-LutheranismModern Protestantism

not to mention, many confessional Lutherans - especially on this site, claim to be Evangelical Catholics and even closer to Catholicism than mainline-Lutheranism.
I really don’t understand what you’re trying to say.
 
This is essentially what Luther and others called “enthusiasm.”
Excellent word for Christians. I understand that the Greek background for this word is “en theos” meaning “in God.”

I give you Greek scholars to tear apart my “Greek” but do it gently. :o
 
Of course they don’t reject to any order of service. They (meaning the people I was referring to earlier, not necessarily Pentecostals) don’t see anything wrong with it because they don’t see it as ritual, but it is. That’s the irony.
But you are assuming that to be faithful to their views they must see all ritual as wrong. This assumption is unwarranted.

They can and are perfectly consistent in their arguments to differentiate between people who abuse ritual–those who use ritual as “a form of godliness” lacking any power–and those who use ritual, liturgy, program, etc. rightly–who worship God in Spirit and in Truth.
Thanks. I’d be interested in your response to what I wrote about Rom. 6:4, namely:

" In Rom. 6:4, Paul specifically says that we are buried with Christ through baptism, and in the Greek, the grammatical construction unmistakably indicates instrumentality, thus teaching that baptism is the means by which we are buried with Christ. "
Romans 6:4 in context states:

Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.

I don’t deny that baptism is a burial of the old man or that in baptism, like Noah and his family in the ark or the Hebrews at the Red Sea, we pass safely through the waters of death to rise in newness of life.

I think it is important, however, to refer to the whole counsel of God, which does not ascribe instrumentality to baptism (or more specifically the waters of baptism) but clarifies that faith is the instrument by which we are united with Christ.

The whole thrust of the Epistle to the Romans is justification by faith alone, not faith and baptism: “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 5:1).

Elsewhere, Paul speaks of baptism and faith together in such a way that shows that faith is the means with which we are regenerated and justified, while baptism is an outward expression or proof of that faith.

Galatians 3:26-27, “for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.”

In Colossians 2:12, Paul makes explicit what he implies in Romans 6:4.

Colossians 2:11-12, “In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.”

In 1 Peter 3:21 we are taught the following: “Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”

How does baptism save? It saves by being an appeal to God for a good conscience. This is what faith does. It appeals. We see the appeal to or calling out to God in faith clearly in Romans 10:6-13:

But the righteousness based on faith says, “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?’” (that is, to bring Christ down) “or ‘Who will descend into the abyss?’” (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead). But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith that we proclaim); because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved. For the Scripture says, “Everyone who believes in him will not be put to shame.” For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek; for the same Lord is Lord of all, bestowing his riches on all who call on him. For “everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top