I was on a Buddhist forum, and something interesting caught my attention. Buddhism teaches that there is no need for faith, that the teachings of Buddhism can be proven to be self-evident by simply examining them. I know that this is the complete opposite of Christianity, in which faith fundamental, so my question is, if Buddhism is true and provable, has anyone tried it, and can it truly refute Christianity as the path?
Most traditions of Buddhism do not require an element of faith as in Christianity. However, if you define faith as simply a belief, then certainly Buddhists have “faith”. If you didn’t have any faith at all, what would be the point of following anything?
In Buddhism, especially in its oldest form, one is encouraged to read Scriptures, meditate and live according to the 8 fold path. If one does so, the truth becomes self-evident to them. That is, peace and happiness become a reality and personal faith in the path is born.
Well, certainly there are many Buddhist teachers and laypeople who have found it true and provable to themselves, but it is impossible for them to give you what they have. You have to experience it for yourself. There is no divine revelation as seen in Christianity.
The goal of Buddhism is not to refute any other religion, but to find the way to peace and happiness and freedom from the cycle of birth and death. So, it’s much less about proving others wrong, but all about proving to yourself whether or not Buddhism is right for you.
Hope that helps. By the way, there is a sect of Buddhism called “Pure Land” in the Japanese traditions (which I followed mainly, along with Zen) that is entirely faith driven and very similar to the faith concept in Christianity.
After following Pure Land and having faith in Amida Buddha, I began to ask myself “if I can have faith that Amida Buddha exists and follow him, why not follow the Christ of my youth”. And my journey back home began.
Peace…
MW