T
Truth_Faith13
Guest
I agreeI doubt anyone finds it scandalous to take a ballet class or go see a ballet performance, even though in the 1800s ballet dancers were considered the equivalent of prostitutes.
And certainly no one finds it scandalous to see a female actress perform, even though in the 1600s actresses were considered the equivalent of prostitutes. (All of the roles in Elizabethan plays were filled by men, including the female roles.)
Nor do they find it scandalous for a woman to walk around with her hair uncovered, even though in Paul’s time only prostitutes did that.
Like it or not, some of what is at one point considered “inherently sexual” just isn’t.