Christians Under Attack

  • Thread starter Thread starter discipleofJesus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Disciple of Jesus,

I looked at the site and it looks truly sad. The religion of peace and tolerance strikes or proves again!
M1
 
40.png
discipleofJesus:
Christians Under Attack
mychristianblood.blogspirit.com/
Click to expand...
I guess these Muslims dont read their Qoran because if they did they would not be attacking the Copts. So much for the facade of peace and tolerance. I suggest they take a page from the Christian bible about Love thy neighbor. But that would be too much to read.
 
40.png
discipleofJesus:
Christians Under Attack
mychristianblood.blogspirit.com/
Click to expand...
Personally, I am not fooled by the empty words of the Muslim world. I know what they are because of their deeds. They may say one thing and do another. Christians are foolish to believe that this is a religion of tolerance and justice. Muslims are only for Muslims and that is that. Again I am not fooled by Muslims or their rhetoric.
 
40.png
StMarkEofE:
Personally, I am not fooled by the empty words of the Muslim world. I know what they are because of their deeds. They may say one thing and do another. Christians are foolish to believe that this is a religion of tolerance and justice. Muslims are only for Muslims and that is that. Again I am not fooled by Muslims or their rhetoric.
Click to expand...
now, if this diatribe were about blacks and not muslims, you’d be chastized and labelled a racist.

if this diatribe were about the jews you’d be censured and labelled an anti-semetic.

if this diatribe were about women, you’d be attacked and labelled a sexist, male-chauvinist pig.

but because it’s about muslims, your words here will probably be okayed by a large number and wouldn’t be considered prejudiced, or bigoted . . . :rolleyes: .
 
So… what exactly is the appeal of Islam that it would SWEEP whole segments of the world?

So… what exactly is the lack of appeal of Christianity that there are so few Christians in … say… Saudi Arabia?
 
40.png
r.gonzales:
now, if this diatribe were about blacks and not muslims, you’d be chastized and labelled a racist.

if this diatribe were about the jews you’d be censured and labelled an anti-semetic.

if this diatribe were about women, you’d be attacked and labelled a sexist, male-chauvinist pig.

but because it’s about muslims, your words here will probably be okayed by a large number and wouldn’t be considered prejudiced, or bigoted . . . :rolleyes: .
Click to expand...
But none of the comments are about race or gender they are about actions. It is exactly what Ralph Waldo Emerson said “What you do speaks so loud that I cannot hear what you say.”
 
Dear Al Maseti,

You said:
So… what exactly is the appeal of Islam that it would SWEEP whole segments of the world?

So… what exactly is the lack of appeal of Christianity that there are so few Christians in … say… Saudi Arabia?

Well, in Saudi Arabia? Are you kidding? Do you know the fate of apostasy in Saudi Arabia? And anyway, Christians don’t like immigrating to Saudi or other country with Sharia Law, but moslems who love Sharia Law immigrates to countries with no Sharia Law. Contradiction or hypocrisy?

Neverland
 
40.png
r.gonzales:
now, if this diatribe were about blacks and not muslims, you’d be chastized and labelled a racist.

if this diatribe were about the jews you’d be censured and labelled an anti-semetic.

if this diatribe were about women, you’d be attacked and labelled a sexist, male-chauvinist pig.

but because it’s about muslims, your words here will probably be okayed by a large number and wouldn’t be considered prejudiced, or bigoted . . . :rolleyes: .
Click to expand...
If any of the groups you mentioned were as involved in terrorism, anti-Christianity and sexism as the Muslims are I doubt that what you say would be true. Until Islam begins to act like a religion of peace I will not accept that it is.
 
The following is excerpted from ‘The “racism” canard’ by Robert Spencer
jihadwatch.org/archives/009834.php

"…You continue: “Now, I know there are many among you who will say ‘Muslim’ is a not a race. Clearly true, but the quote was in the context of people who are bigoted against Muslims. (To put this in context, the definition of Anti-Semitism in the M-W dictionary is: ‘hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group.’ I’ll assume good faith in your statement and assume you meant the same, just replacing the word ‘Jews’ with ‘Muslims’).”

I am one who will say that Islam is not a race. It isn’t. It is a religious ideology. People of any race can and do hold to it. I am not interested in keeping white jihadists here and deporting brown jihadists. That would be racism; it would also be asinine. To say, on the other hand, that I don’t want those who want to impose Sharia law, which violates norms of human rights that are otherwise universally accepted, to be here, and that as long as a larger group does nothing to stop such people from living and working within it, that larger group is under suspicion, that has nothing to do with racism or bigotry. Bigotry is an irrational hatred of a group. I don’t hate anyone; I simply oppose a murderous ideology of supremacism and oppression. Your analogy about the Jews founders on the fact that there is no global movement of Jews working to impose Jewish laws on the rest of us. Nazi Jew-hatred was essentially racial: the Nazis had all sorts of race laws to determine who was a Jew and who was not. That, sir, is racism.

If, on the other hand, the Muslim communities in the West today proclaimed their renunciation of Sharia now and forever, and acceptance of Western pluralism and peaceful coexistence with non-Muslims, and full genuine equality of rights for women, and began to manifest the truth of such statements by their actions, well, I would be the first to welcome them by the planeload into our nation. But to assume that all who arrive here have already done that when there is so much evidence to the contrary – that is just foolhardy. And it is in that context that I read Hugh’s statement that you quote: “as a group, the Moslems are a threat to me and those I love.” If you read his whole article (it is not on this site, but I’m sure you can find it), you will see that he explicitly says that all Muslims are not terrorists, etc. But the problem is, again, this business of distinguishing. I have said many times that it is virtually impossible to tell a moderate from a jihadist Muslim. Some have seized on that as some kind of statement of bigotry. I can’t see why it would be. It is simply a statement of fact, confirmed by the strange life paths of Maher Hawash, Fawaz Damra, Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, the Lackawanna Six, and so many others. Where is the firewall? If there is one, why is it so spectacularly ineffective on so many occasions?.."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top