H
hansard
Guest
Are we agreed that Jesus was raised in a body which was remarkably different from the beaten and pierced one in which he suffered three days prior? I mean, he didn’t leave the old body behind in the tomb, but the new one was transformed from the old. Right so far?
He could pass through walls and could be recognisable or unrecognisable even to those who recently knew him. Maybe he glowed slightly, or appeared as a “perfect” human, flawless in any way. Scripture is quite unclear about it.
CC 645 says, "…the risen body in which he appears to them is the same body that had been tortured and crucified, for it still bears the traces of his Passion. Yet at the same time this authentic, real body possesses the new properties of a glorious body: not limited by space and time but able to be present how and when he wills; for Christ’s humanity can no longer be confined to earth…"
Yet he still chose to retain his wounds, which Thomas touched in his doubting moment.
I suppose those wounds would have been symbolic in nature–had Christ risen in his old body, he could not have walked; his thirst would have been immense (especially given that his last drink was a mouthful of vinegar three days ago); the pain from the wounds would have been immense. Therefore, it seems, his new body must have negated the effects of the wounds, while at the same time keeping the appearance of them.
The wounds would have been tangible but painless; visible, yet clean (I’m just guessing).
I’ve also wondered if Christ yet maintains those wounds in Heaven, whether he will keep them as a symbol of his trials as a human. I also wonder if the wounds will be visible when he returns. and whether he’ll keep them forever.
What’s the theology on the status of Christ’s wounds?
He could pass through walls and could be recognisable or unrecognisable even to those who recently knew him. Maybe he glowed slightly, or appeared as a “perfect” human, flawless in any way. Scripture is quite unclear about it.
CC 645 says, "…the risen body in which he appears to them is the same body that had been tortured and crucified, for it still bears the traces of his Passion. Yet at the same time this authentic, real body possesses the new properties of a glorious body: not limited by space and time but able to be present how and when he wills; for Christ’s humanity can no longer be confined to earth…"
Yet he still chose to retain his wounds, which Thomas touched in his doubting moment.
I suppose those wounds would have been symbolic in nature–had Christ risen in his old body, he could not have walked; his thirst would have been immense (especially given that his last drink was a mouthful of vinegar three days ago); the pain from the wounds would have been immense. Therefore, it seems, his new body must have negated the effects of the wounds, while at the same time keeping the appearance of them.
The wounds would have been tangible but painless; visible, yet clean (I’m just guessing).
I’ve also wondered if Christ yet maintains those wounds in Heaven, whether he will keep them as a symbol of his trials as a human. I also wonder if the wounds will be visible when he returns. and whether he’ll keep them forever.
What’s the theology on the status of Christ’s wounds?