F
fido
Guest
If a drug is legalized, then it suddenly becomes NOT a mortal sin to ingest it? What is the principle here? Are you telling me that god looks to politicians to decide on what constitutes a mortal sin?The teachings of the church do indicate that taking *illegal *drugs is a mortal sin.
Of course, the way for a society to function in this imperfect world is to come up with mutual agreements. Let’s not murder, steal, or lie to each other (in court). Then we must set up a system to deal with these offenders. ALL law is backed up by the threat of force. We know that a person who owns sneakers COULD sneak into a home and rob it. But we do not make owning sneakers against the law, we only make the harmful act ITSELF illegal. It would be immoral to ban sneakers. The same is true for alcohol and other drugs. A person can own and ingest these things without harming another person. Therefore drug prohibition is immoral.Most peoples have known that murder, stealing and infidelity are wrong, along with excessive intoxication.
I never promoted the use, nor implied the harmlessness of, Marijuana. People should choose for themselves. But now that you mentioned it, Marijuana is basically as harmful as cigarettes and beer. Though I do think by most measures it is more beneficial and less harmful than both of those.Now fido’s promotion of the use of marijuana implies that it’s harmless (both in a moral and physical sense).
I obviously didn’t mean that “we no longer should have any DUI laws”. The law is against DRIVING under the influence, not merely BEING under the influence. A DUI law does not violate the moral code that you cannot threaten violence against others for ingesting. The DUI law threatens violence against those who ingest AND drive.Should we no longer have any DUI laws? According to fido, “Threatening violence against someone for attempting to put something in their OWN bodies is immoral.” So it’s not immoral to ingest a substance that can cause harm to yourself or others?
So you would agree that the laws that CREATED this black market are immoral. Prohibition is a gift to criminals who would otherwise not get to enterprise off of a substance. Alcohol related gang violence existed for ten years in this country. Where is this violence now? You seem nice but you have obviously not given any thought to this subject. If you still want to debate me you can, but you might just have to humble yourself and admit that I am right. If you walk into a voting booth and choose to uphold prohibition laws, then you are helping gangs and terrorists fund their organizations.Another important point about using illegal drugs: THEY SUPPORT CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES. Many gangs get the bulk of their money from selling illegal drugs. This alone makes it immoral and a serious sin to me
But I can see where you are going with your thought process. From what you said, I can conclude that since foie gras is illegal in some states, its illegality “alone makes it immoral and a serious sin to (you)”. A person offers you some goose liver in Chicago and you consider it a “serious sin” to partake? Do you really think God is this petty?
Right, at some point down the line, the seeds came from the earth. The original status of Marijuana was a weed that grows. If I grow my own and sell it and give it away, then I have actually taken market share AWAY from the gangs.(and if you use the arguement or growing your own plants, remember that at some point down the line, the seeds came from somewhere else).
And as a personal note, I know of several people who became “burnouts” after excessive use of marijuana at college.
My advice to Asbestos Mango would be to stick to all possible legal options (including whatever free medical assistance he can find). Good Luck and God Bless You.