I would say—although I have no reference for it—that those councils, like the Carthage, Orange etc, which were not considered ecumenical would also still be accepted as authoritative, because they did deal with doctrines, like combating Pelagianism, that are accepted by all orthodox Christians. As for the Canon of Scripture, it is my understanding that the Synod of Westminster (1571) in drawing up the 39 Articles of the Church of England was the only official listing of canonical books by a Protestant Church body—I may be wrong. I think Dr. Luther’s translation ofthe Bible into German set the canon for German-speaking & Lutheran countries, sort of by default. I don’t think there was ever a council per se. I think most Protestants just assume that the Canon of Scripture has just always existed. Like a colleague of mine says, they think the Bible arrived in 1611 in a box addressed to King James I, with a note from God saying “Dear Jim, please publish this.” They have very little idea at all of where the Bible as we have it came from. Actually it is my study of the development of the Canon of Scripture and its dependence on the Oral Tradition of the Apostles that has brought me much closer to the roman view of Scripture and tradition.