Church militant.TV

  • Thread starter Thread starter october_baby
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The topic of this thread is:

Do you agree or disagree it is interesting and informative?
Do you agree or disagree that Mr. Voris is a forceful and knowledgeable host?

Posts which do not address those questions are off topic and belong elsewhere.
As, I see no evidence that Mr. Voris “teaches” in accordance with the Magisterium of the Church, I must disagree that the show is interesting nor informative.

I agree that he is forceful. I must disagree that he is a knowledgeable host for the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.
 
Do you agree or disagree it is interesting and informative?
Do you agree or disagree that Mr. Voris is a forceful and knowledgeable host?
I agree very much that it is interesting and informative!!! Many countless people have strengthened their faith and returned to the Church after watching his videos.

Oh yes - he is quite forceful!! Just like some apostles and saints - he tells it like it is, and holds no punches. He is extremely knowledgeable, and is most happy and willing to provide all sources for the content of his shows when asked.

~Liza
 
Do you agree or disagree it is interesting and informative?
Do you agree or disagree that Mr. Voris is a forceful and knowledgeable host?

Posts which do not address those questions are off topic and belong elsewhere.
It is highly interesting and informative. It gives people a different insight into Catholicism. 🙂

He is very forceful and politically incorrect. Both are badly needed things to have at this time.
 
I think Mr. Voris is confident in his own views and opinions and presents them with confidence. Often this is in agreement with the Catholic Church. I see him as no only politically incorrect, but incorrect in other ways, both in his judgment and his understanding of the Catholic Church. I find his role of the accuser of the brethren in regards to scandal to be ironic in that I consider his video blogs to be a scandal. I would never recommend them to a new Catholic, or any Catholic without spiritual roots, as I think they could easily be a source of stumbling.
 
I just searched for this topic and found this thread. After reading your responses I think becoming a paid member of Church Militant TV would be a good use of my money. I have been watching the free shows for a few weeks now and am impressed with the evangalization of this group.
 
I like Voris’ work and I highly recommend his premium membership to anybody. His Votex segment is an opinionated political piece and while I think it’s a great commentary I have to admit that it really isn’t representative of the rest of the content on his network. Even his live talks are much more focused on making us into members of Church Militant and giving us the tools that we need to defend and promote the faith. The Vortex spends time commenting on the problems in the Church, the rest of his network spends time teaching us how we can actually fix these problems!

It’s so important for Catholics to know how to defend and promote our faith… Even if you cannot convert somebody, when this person is lying on his/her death-bed they might think back to the conversation that you had and everything you have said to them might start to make sense. If we can’t defend our faith, however, and explain why the Church teaches what it teaches, then we are doing a grave dis-service to those around us since Satan will continue to be able to use misconceptions that the Church is an oppressive and intolerant institution to keep people from thinking critically about Church teaching and that it’s their best chances for heaven. Spreading Christ to the world is the true “sprit of Vatican II” and, ironically, Michael Voris is doing much more to promote the intentions of this council then many of the so-called “spirit of Vatican II defenders” are even coming close to doing.
 
Spreading Christ to the world is the true “sprit of Vatican II” and, ironically, Michael Voris is doing much more to promote the intentions of this council then many of the so-called “spirit of Vatican II defenders” are even coming close to doing.
Then it’s a shame he spends his airtime on politics and what his betters do rather than on Christ. Calling for a monarchy and saying that non-Catholics should not be allowed to vote is a really swell way of “spreading Christ” around and bringing credit to the Church.🤷
 
Then it’s a shame he spends his airtime on politics and what his betters do rather than on Christ. Calling for a monarchy and saying that non-Catholics should not be allowed to vote is a really swell way of “spreading Christ” around and bringing credit to the Church.🤷
He seems to be shooting himself in the foot if he’s trying to spread Christ. Although, he does seem to claim an interesting bunch of groupies.
 
Then it’s a shame he spends his airtime on politics and what his betters do rather than on Christ. Calling for a monarchy and saying that non-Catholics should not be allowed to vote is a really swell way of “spreading Christ” around and bringing credit to the Church.🤷
That he stated his political opinion doesn’t equate to “he spends his airtime on politics and what his betters do rather than on Christ”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top