S
StTommyMore
Guest
Let me propose a hypothetical situation. Lets just say that all Masses were to be in Latin, and the vernacular went away. Would you still be giving the same opinion, or would you want it changed back?And you need to accept that this is not a matter of faith and morals, but of discipline, so Blessed John XXIII’s directive is not assured of an infallibility other than the negative one that protects all disciplines, ie, any discipline of the Church cannot lead the faithful to impiety. Further, Blessed John’s teaching here could not be construed as binding on his successors, who DID permit the liturgy in the vernacular, any more than Quo Primum can be construed as binding on future popes who might make changes to that liturgy.
The all-vernacular Mass is a legitimate part of the Church, authorized by the proper authority of the Holy See.