D
Dakota_Roberts
Guest
“They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity.”Correct. But that is not the only reason that sexual activity between two of the same sex is morally forbidden.
Heterosexuals using contraceptives are violating the inherently procreative (i.e., uninterrupted, unmanipulated) aspect of heterosexual activity. They are not “committing sodomy.” You are very confused.
No, I did not “mean procreative.” Unitive in a Catholic, not a secular, context, has a specific meaning when used within the category of moral theology. That meaning relates to a heterosexual relationship and nothing else. There is an additional meaning of unitive as it applies to spirituality – specifically, mysticism. Unitive does not apply in any broad sense to relationships of all kinds. (In a Catholic context. We are talking about Catholicism here, not Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary.)
And more than half of practicing Catholics, as well as more than half of the current CAF posting population, do not understand even the essentials of Catholic moral theology – never mind “fully.”
Well, sodomy is sterile sexual acts, and contraception is intentionally trying to make it sterile so it could be theologically debated although it probably isn’t sodomy per se.
“They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity.” When it says sexual complementarity it means sexual complementarity not unitive. What I referenced regarding unitive was the Summa Theologica by Saint Thomas Aquinas who is considered one of the greatest theologians ever and is a Doctor of the Church…
Maybe 20% of the Catholic population understand the essentially as to fully we are talking a very very small amount.
