F
FrDavid96
Guest
Actually “Mass of the Resurrection” is precisely the wrong term for a funeral Mass of any kind. That term is reserved for the Masses on Easter Sunday and the Octave. The Holy See actually very specifically forbids using that term for funeral Masses in a document about 10 years ago. I’m searching for it, but can’t find the reference right now.Gorgias:![]()
Our priest told us when the body is present, the correct term for the Eucharistic liturgy is “Mass of the Resurrection.”It’s not a “burial Mass”. It’s either a “Funeral Mass” or a “Funeral Liturgy outside Mass”.
The body isn’t ‘gone’; rather, it’s present as cremains.
Are you suggesting that, in those cases in which a body is not present, a Funeral Mass cannot be held? Think long and hard about the assertion you’re attempting to make…
When cremains present, the term is “Memorial Mass.”
I prefer the full symbolic gesture of the first option, as does the church, however I respect Mom’s wish. It’s been a year.
A funeral Mass is an opportunity for the faithful to pray for the deceased. It is not a canonization.
If the remains (either whole or cremated) are present, it’s a funeral Mass (which is itself a subset of “Masses for the Dead”)
If the remains are not present, it’s properly called a Mass for the Dead (Missa pro defunctis). That’s the official term used in the Missal. Other terms can also be used, such as Requiem Mass. Yes, some use the term “memorial Mass.”
I avoid using the term “memorial” because that is too easily confused with a “memorial” or a saint in the calendar. Also, it’s insufficient. We aren’t there to “memorialize” the deceased, but to pray for the deceased. As I said, though, many people do use the term. It’s my personal preference not to use it.