Commandments should not be followed ...

  • Thread starter Thread starter guanophore
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
moondweller:
IOW, God’s supreme motive in saving men through Christ is nothing less than His purpose to demonstrate before all intelligences - principalities and powers - celestial and terrestrial - the exceeding riches of His grace. Throughout all the ages to come those whom He saved completely, perfectly and eternally through faith alone in Christ alone, will each be living demonstrations of the glorious attribute of God’s infinite GRACE (unmerited favor).
:yup: God’s grace is more than necessary to salvation; it’s all that’s needed (sufficient) for salvation. Therein lies the disagreement/difference between the Catholic and me.
 
:yup: God’s grace is more than necessary to salvation; it’s all that’s needed (sufficient) for salvation. Therein lies the disagreement/difference between the Catholic and me.
And yet…“if I have all faith, so as to remove mountains but have not love, I am nothing.” And if you love someone you must do something for that person, the point of Jas 2:14ff. For if we live in love, we live in God according to John for Jesus has commanded us to love one another as He loved us. Our reward for faith and love - “What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man conceived, what God has prepared for those who love him.” But we cannot boast, rather we need always remember “I am like an evergreen cypress, from me comes your fruit.” Hos 14:8 Yes, we are saved by grace and cannot earn salvation but we can lose salvation if we fail to imitate Christ and live in love (cf. Lk 16:19ff). Have a nice weekend.
 
Well there’s your answer, folks. The true believer, during this church age, has nothing to do with Law, or any aspect of it (e.g., the Decalogue). The believer’s rule of life before God, now “in Christ,” is that of GRACE (unmerited favor) alone: “Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 8:1; cf. Jn. 5:24).
Thank you! It is about time you posted this. There is some excellent stuff here, and some I simply disagree with. Most of all I find it of no practical use as I said way back when on a related thread. ISTM that Christs commandment to love one another encompasses the Decalogue in its entirety and raises the bar some leaving us still seeking to love God and part of our expression of gratitude involves not lying, stealing, killing, fornicating, etc etc etc. Saying we are not under the law but under grace is true, but if you find yourself breaking the commandments of the Decalogue routinely and without remorse, ya gotta question your grace side of the equation.
Both Catholic and Protestants err in thinking the only relationship God can have with men is one that is based on Law.
True - I dont think anyone was making that claim though. Either way, if both Catholics and Protestants err on such a fundamental issue, then sola scriptura and the concept of the perspicuity of scripture is pure hogwash.
 
:yup: God’s grace is more than necessary to salvation; it’s all that’s needed (sufficient) for salvation. Therein lies the disagreement/difference between the Catholic and me.
I agree with your first sentence and Im Catholic, so I guess I dont understand your second sentence.

Your new signature is weak, however. Trusting in those with authority can definitely be an act of faith. Perhaps that would be difficult to see if someone thought too highly of their own opinion or simply lacked humility.
 
Well there’s your answer, folks. The true believer, during this church age, has nothing to do with Law, or any aspect of it (e.g., the Decalogue). The believer’s rule of life before God, now “in Christ,” is that of GRACE (unmerited favor) alone: “Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus” (Rom. 8:1; cf. Jn. 5:24).

Grace is prostituted when mixed with Law in any way. Both Catholic and Protestants err in thinking the only relationship God can have with men is one that is based on Law.
Hi moondweller.

Thanks both to yourself and the catholic posters this thread is giving a lot of food for thought. Some aspects could maybe be cleared with your and everybody’s help.

What do you precisely mean here by “the Law” ? I see it includes the Decalogue in your view.

Now, it has been noted that at least large parts of the Decalogue are explicitly proposed in post-Resurrection NT, and that really needs to be addressed in the context of your statements.

Consider, moreover, the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15. The issue was about mosaic law there. Yet, the only specific matters we see quoted before or after the debate are circumcision and some dietary norms.
Should we imagine that while the abolition of circumcision was a grave concern in the apostolic Church, explicitly recorded in Scripture, such a momentous decision as supposedly abolishing the Ten Commandments passed without any recorded concern ?

We are saved sola gratia, we agree.
But what do you mean stating that believer’s rule of life before God, now “in Christ,” is that of GRACE (unmerited favor) alone ? Does unmerited favor constitute the rule of life , or rather does it permit to follow the rule ? Isn’t the specifically christian rule the commandment of LOVE ?
 
Question… If we are not supposed to keep the commandments of God, the Ten Commandments are the commandments of God, then why is it that John in the Revelation of Jesus Christ writes “And the dragon(the Devil) was wroth with the woman (the Church), and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD and the testamony of Jesus Christ.” Revelation 12:17

The last days will find a great presecution against those who truly follow God and remain obedient to him. Love is the motivation that causes us to love God, because he first loved us and has shown that love through his sacficial offering of His Son upon the Cross. Let us not be disceived, we are under Grace and through Grace we gain the power of the Holy Ghost to overcome sin, the transgression of the Law, for our God is greater then the unrighteous’s leader, the deceiver the Devil. Let no man deceive you, Satan has already lost the battle, he just doesn’t want to give it up and wants to take as many with him as he can.

Let love of God abound through the Grace of Jesus Christ.
 
Another Question

Who gave man the authority to change the commandments of God, written by his own hand, in stone, and spoken to the Israelites from MT Sinai. I find nowhere in the Bible where Jesus or God spoke to anybody giving such authority. Nor did Jesus make any new commandments changing or removing any of them. Is man greater than God that he can change that which God established and blessed forever?

And the truth shall set you free.
 
Since Moondweller’s back, perhaps he can stop evading these questions:

Which Commandments does Christ command us to ignore? (Scripture, please).

Is Christ one in being with God?
Still waiting, Moondweller.

Perhaps those questions whose answers contradict your false, manmade tradition of dispensationalism you simply won’t consider?
 
Moondweller seems to love Romans (well, at least St Paul’s Epistle of the same name), but he still has not addressed this point, originally raised by Mikeledes:

The bold passage is an interesting one for Moondweller to ignore, given his position, isn’t it?
Moondweller, we’re also still waiting for your response to the question raised by Romans 13 and the command of Christ that we love one another, especially in light of your earlier response to the question of “Do you love as Christ loved?”:
I’m not saved by my quality of love, but through my faith in Him.
This likewise doesn’t seem to square with Matthew 25, where Christ tells us how we will be judged.

We continue to look forward to your response to these questions.

One more you may have missed in ignoring the others:

How does St Paul’s circumcising Timothy play into the dispensationalist framework and teaching of Pauline thought? Was St Paul damned for engaging in works of the Law after the Resurrection?
 
I’m also frankly a little disappointed that you won’t answer my questions, Moondweller, given that I’ve answered all of yours and beyond that, you articulated the following earlier in response to criticism of your questions:
Why? Because there are questions stated here that require you to face and think about?
Are you having trouble facing and thinking about my questions?

I presume that you’re simply forgetful, so I’ll keep posting them.
 
40.png
Philthy:
I agree with your first sentence and Im Catholic, so I guess I dont understand your second sentence.
There has never been any disagreement with respect to the necessity of grace in salvation.

The disagreement is over the sufficiency of grace…by grace you have been saved…, and nothing else.
40.png
Philthy:
Your new signature is weak, however. Trusting in those with authority can definitely be an act of faith. Perhaps that would be difficult to see if someone thought too highly of their own opinion or simply lacked humility.
I liked that signature; I find it as appropriate now as when Calvin first uttered it; however, I’ve changed it for you, and for this thread.
 
What? :confused: What I refuse to do is mix law and grace and thereby distort God’s supreme motive in saving men by grace alone - to the demonstration of His glory.
In the course of doing this, you imply that the immutable moral precepts of God do not apply to the Christian.
 
:yup: God’s grace is more than necessary to salvation; it’s all that’s needed (sufficient) for salvation. Therein lies the disagreement/difference between the Catholic and me.
I suppose this it true. Although Catholics agree that salvation occurs by God’s grace, we do not consider that it is all that is needed. We consider that grace must meet with faith in the hearer in order to accomplish salvation. Those who do not place their faith in God are not able to access His grace.🤷
 
I suppose this it true. Although Catholics agree that salvation occurs by God’s grace, we do not consider that it is all that is needed. We consider that grace must meet with faith in the hearer in order to accomplish salvation. Those who do not place their faith in God are not able to access His grace.🤷
Indeed, that’s why the Fundamentalist claim of grace alone is spurious.

If grace alone were all that was required, it would not matter if we have faith or not.

Clearly, it matters.

Moreover, Jesus in his teaching on salvation does not say that he will do everything and we will do nothing. That would completely invalidate his command to “take up your cross and follow me”, among other things.

Matthew 25 tells us on what basis we will be judged.

Besides, if Fundamentalists really believed in grace alone, drinkin’ and dancin’ would be a-okay with them.
 
Another Question

Who gave man the authority to change the commandments of God, written by his own hand, in stone, and spoken to the Israelites from MT Sinai. I find nowhere in the Bible where Jesus or God spoke to anybody giving such authority. Nor did Jesus make any new commandments changing or removing any of them. Is man greater than God that he can change that which God established and blessed forever?

And the truth shall set you free.
Jesus changed how people were to observe the commandments. He did not change the immutable moral principles upon which the Law is based. Jesus gave His Apostles this authority. That is what it means to “bind and loose”. This is the authority to legislate. In your faith tradition, you have to reject that this authority is real, or that this authority was passed on to the Successors of the Apostles.

Jesus did make new commandments, changed, and removed things. You probably also reject that Jesus is God, which is how you can say such things.
 
Still waiting, Moondweller.

Perhaps those questions whose answers contradict your false, manmade tradition of dispensationalism you simply won’t consider?
I think he did answer this when he said that nothing in the Law pertains to the Christian whatsoever.
 
Jesus changed how people were to observe the commandments. He did not change the immutable moral principles upon which the Law is based. Jesus gave His Apostles this authority. That is what it means to “bind and loose”. This is the authority to legislate. In your faith tradition, you have to reject that this authority is real, or that this authority was passed on to the Successors of the Apostles.

Jesus did make new commandments, changed, and removed things. You probably also reject that Jesus is God, which is how you can say such things.
Jesus did not change the Commandments, he changed the Levitical laws. In Matthew 19, for example, he tells the rich man to keep the Commandments if he is to receive eternal life.

As we see in St Paul’s summary in Romans 13, Christ’s commandment that we love one another is simply a summation of the Commandments. It is not a license to steal, or murder, or commit adultery, etc as these by definition invariably involve treating a neighbor in an unloving fashion.

What we have in this thread is the Fundamentalist trying to stretch and distort what is meant by the Law which St Paul condemns to extend to everything God had given man before Good Friday. They do this to justify their heretical dispensation theology, which came about more than 1,800 years too late for Pentecost.

More.
 
As always, the Catechism enlightens:

2052 “Teacher, what good deed must I do, to have eternal life?” To the young man who asked this question, Jesus answers first by invoking the necessity to recognize God as the “One there is who is good,” as the supreme Good and the source of all good. **Then Jesus tells him: “If you would enter life, keep the commandments.” And he cites for his questioner the precepts that concern love of neighbor: “You shall not kill, You shall not commit adultery, You shall not steal, You shall not bear false witness, Honor your father and mother.” Finally Jesus sums up these commandments positively: "You shall love your neighbor as yourself."1 **

2053 To this first reply Jesus adds a second: "If you would be perfect, go, sell what you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me."2 This reply does not do away with the first: following Jesus Christ involves keeping the Commandments. The Law has not been abolished,3 but rather man is invited to rediscover it in the person of his Master who is its perfect fulfillment. In the three synoptic Gospels, Jesus’ call to the rich young man to follow him, in the obedience of a disciple and in the observance of the Commandments, is joined to the call to poverty and chastity.4 The evangelical counsels are inseparable from the Commandments.

2054 Jesus acknowledged the Ten Commandments, but he also showed the power of the Spirit at work in their letter. He preached a "righteousness [which] exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees"5 as well as that of the Gentiles.6 He unfolded all the demands of the Commandments. "You have heard that it was said to the men of old, ‘You shall not kill.’ . . . But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment."7

2055 When someone asks him, "Which commandment in the Law is the greatest?"8 Jesus replies: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the greatest and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments hang all the Law and the prophets."9 The Decalogue must be interpreted in light of this twofold yet single commandment of love, the fullness of the Law:

The commandments: “You shall not commit adultery, You shall not kill, You shall not steal, You shall not covet,” and any other commandment, are summed up in this sentence: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.10
The Decalogue in Sacred Scripture

2056 The word “Decalogue” means literally "ten words."11 God revealed these “ten words” to his people on the holy mountain. They were written "with the finger of God,"12 unlike the other commandments written by Moses.13 They are pre-eminently the words of God. They are handed on to us in the books of Exodus14 and Deuteronomy.15 Beginning with the Old Testament, the sacred books refer to the "ten words,"16 but it is in the New Covenant in Jesus Christ that their full meaning will be revealed.

2057 The Decalogue must first be understood in the context of the Exodus, God’s great liberating event at the center of the Old Covenant. Whether formulated as negative commandments, prohibitions, or as positive precepts such as: “Honor your father and mother,” the “ten words” point out the conditions of a life freed from the slavery of sin. The Decalogue is a path of life:

If you love the LORD your God, by walking in his ways, and by keeping his commandments and his statutes and his ordinances, then you shall live and multiply.17

This liberating power of the Decalogue appears, for example, in the commandment about the sabbath rest, directed also to foreigners and slaves:

You shall remember that you were a servant in the land of Egypt, and the LORD your God brought you out thence with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm.18

2058 The “ten words” sum up and proclaim God’s law: "These words the Lord spoke to all your assembly at the mountain out of the midst of the fire, the cloud, and the thick darkness, with a loud voice; and he added no more. And he wrote them upon two tables of stone, and gave them to me."19 For this reason these two tables are called “the Testimony.” In fact, they contain the terms of the covenant concluded between God and his people. These “tables of the Testimony” were to be deposited in "the ark."20

2059 The “ten words” are pronounced by God in the midst of a theophany ("The LORD spoke with you face to face at the mountain, out of the midst of the fire."21). They belong to God’s revelation of himself and his glory. The gift of the Commandments is the gift of God himself and his holy will. In making his will known, God reveals himself to his people.

2060 The gift of the commandments and of the Law is part of the covenant God sealed with his own. In Exodus, the revelation of the “ten words” is granted between the proposal of the covenant22 and its conclusion - after the people had committed themselves to “do” all that the Lord had said, and to “obey” it.23 The Decalogue is never handed on without first recalling the covenant (“The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb.”).24

2061 The Commandments take on their full meaning within the covenant. According to Scripture, man’s moral life has all its meaning in and through the covenant. The first of the “ten words” recalls that God loved his people first:

Since there was a passing from the paradise of freedom to the slavery of this world, in punishment for sin, the first phrase of the Decalogue, the first word of God’s commandments, bears on freedom "I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery."25

2062 **The Commandments properly so-called come in the second place: they express the implications of belonging to God through the establishment of the covenant. Moral existence is a response to the Lord’s loving initiative. It is the acknowledgement and homage given to God and a worship of thanksgiving. It is cooperation with the plan God pursues in history. **

2063 The covenant and dialogue between God and man are also attested to by the fact that all the obligations are stated in the first person (“I am the Lord.”) and addressed by God to another personal subject (“you”). In all God’s commandments, the singular personal pronoun designates the recipient. God makes his will known to each person in particular, at the same time as he makes it known to the whole people:

The Lord prescribed love towards God and taught justice towards neighbor, so that man would be neither unjust, nor unworthy of God. Thus, through the Decalogue, God prepared man to become his friend and to live in harmony with his neighbor. . . . The words of the Decalogue remain likewise for us Christians. Far from being abolished, they have received amplification and development from the fact of the coming of the Lord in the flesh.26
The Decalogue in the Church’s Tradition

2064 In fidelity to Scripture and in conformity with the example of Jesus, the tradition of the Church has acknowledged the primordial importance and significance of the Decalogue.

2065 Ever since St. Augustine, the Ten Commandments have occupied a predominant place in the catechesis of baptismal candidates and the faithful. In the fifteenth century, the custom arose of expressing the commandments of the Decalogue in rhymed formulae, easy to memorize and in positive form. They are still in use today. The catechisms of the Church have often expounded Christian morality by following the order of the Ten Commandments.

2066 The division and numbering of the Commandments have varied in the course of history. The present catechism follows the division of the Commandments established by St. Augustine, which has become traditional in the Catholic Church. It is also that of the Lutheran confessions. The Greek Fathers worked out a slightly different division, which is found in the Orthodox Churches and Reformed communities.

2067 The Ten Commandments state what is required in the love of God and love of neighbor. The first three concern love of God, and the other seven love of neighbor.

As charity comprises the two commandments to which the Lord related the whole Law and the prophets . . . so the Ten Commandments were themselves given on two tablets. Three were written on one tablet and seven on the other.27
2068 **The Council of Trent teaches that the Ten Commandments are obligatory for Christians and that the justified man is still bound to keep them;28 the Second Vatican Council confirms: "The bishops, successors of the apostles, receive from the Lord . . . the mission of teaching all peoples, and of preaching the Gospel to every creature, so that all men may attain salvation through faith, Baptism and the observance of the Commandments."29 **
 
The unity of the Decalogue

2069 The Decalogue forms a coherent whole. Each “word” refers to each of the others and to all of them; they reciprocally condition one another. The two tables shed light on one another; they form an organic unity. To transgress one commandment is to infringe all the others.30 One cannot honor another person without blessing God his Creator. One cannot adore God without loving all men, his creatures. The Decalogue brings man’s religious and social life into unity.

The Decalogue and the natural law

2070 **The Ten Commandments belong to God’s revelation. At the same time they teach us the true humanity of man. They bring to light the essential duties, and therefore, indirectly, the fundamental rights inherent in the nature of the human person. **The Decalogue contains a privileged expression of the natural law:

From the beginning, God had implanted in the heart of man the precepts of the natural law. Then he was content to remind him of them. This was the Decalogue.31

2071 The commandments of the Decalogue, although accessible to reason alone, have been revealed. To attain a complete and certain understanding of the requirements of the natural law, sinful humanity needed this revelation:

A full explanation of the commandments of the Decalogue became necessary in the state of sin because the light of reason was obscured and the will had gone astray.32
We know God’s commandments through the divine revelation proposed to us in the Church, and through the voice of moral conscience.

The obligation of the Decalogue

2072 Since they express man’s fundamental duties towards God and towards his neighbor, the Ten Commandments reveal, in their primordial content, grave obligations. They are fundamentally immutable, and they oblige always and everywhere. No one can dispense from them. The Ten Commandments are engraved by God in the human heart.

2073 Obedience to the Commandments also implies obligations in matter which is, in itself, light. Thus abusive language is forbidden by the fifth commandment, but would be a grave offense only as a result of circumstances or the offender’s intention.

“Apart from me you can do nothing”

2074 Jesus says: "I am the vine, you are the branches. He who abides in me, and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing."33 The fruit referred to in this saying is the holiness of a life made fruitful by union with Christ. When we believe in Jesus Christ, partake of his mysteries, and keep his commandments, the Savior himself comes to love, in us, his Father and his brethren, our Father and our brethren. His person becomes, through the Spirit, the living and interior rule of our activity. "This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you."34

There you have it.
 
I think he did answer this when he said that nothing in the Law pertains to the Christian whatsoever.
He did not—I asked where in Scripture Christ tells us to ignore the Commandments, and which ones specifically we are to ignore. He has had no response.

I also asked whether Christ and God are one in being. He has not answered that one either.

The latter is important because if Christ and God are one—as Christians maintain they are, as articulated in the Nicene Creed—then the answer to his question is Exodus 20, which I’ve posted several times now.

If the answer to the latter question is “No”, then Moondweller is a non-Trinitarian, which further calls into question the interpretation.

Let’s see how long before we get a definitive response from Moondweller.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top