Commemoration of Joshua

  • Thread starter Thread starter TriuneUnity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TriuneUnity

Guest
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

+ Joshua, Son of Nun +
1 September, Old Testament


Joshua, the son of Nun, was first mentioned in Exodus 17:8-16. The Lord chose him through Moses to fight the Amalekites, whom he defeated in a brilliant military victory. According to Exodus 24, Joshua became close to Moses and accompanied him when he went up Sinai with “Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and seventy of the elders of Israel. (v. 9)” We know this since Scripture says that after he sent the others down the mountain, “Moses rose with his assistant Joshua, and Moses went up into the mountain of God. (v. 13)”

He was devoted to the Lord’s Presence in the Tent of Meeting (Exodus 33:11) and was a member of the tribal representatives sent to survey the land of Canaan (Numbers 13:8). He and Caleb were the only two “spies” who provided honest reports which fully trusted in the Lord to deliver the Promised Land to His people (Numbers 14:6-9).

God later appointed him to succeed Moses as Israel’s leader. First, “Moses summoned Joshua and said to him in the sight of all Israel, ‘Be strong and courageous, for you shall go with this people into the land that the Lord has sworn to their fathers to give them, and you shall put them in possession of it.’ (Deuteronomy 31:7)” Shortly thereafter, “The Lord commissioned Joshua the son of Nun and said, ‘Be strong and courageous, for you shall bring the people of Israel into the land that I swore to give them. I will be with you.’ (v. 23)”

Joshua eventually led the Israelites across the Jordan River into the Promised Land, directing the capture of Jericho (Joshua 6), during which he commanded that the lives of the prostitute Rahab and her family be spared (v. 17). We also remember him for his final address to the Israelites, in which he challenged them to serve God faithfully (24:1-28), declaring, “As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. (24:15)”

No Israelite should have been at all surprised with Joshua’s successes. That’s because Joshua is a shortened form of Jehoshua, which means “Yahweh (the Lord) saves.” Through Joshua, the Lord defeated many armies and enemies, established His people in the promised land, and prepared them for their new life as a nation. This name becomes even dearer to Christians when we realize that the name of Jesus comes from the Greek transliteration of Joshua, “for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved. (Acts 4:12)”
 
Interesting from an Orthodox perspective, because OT saints are commonplace on our liturgical calendar, but I’ve not seen them on others (though I seem to remember the 80’s revision of the Lutheran Hymnal having them, but that was something new. Where did you get this?

My one son’s middle name is Yashu’ (Joshua) and we celebrate his name’s on September 1 (his first name is Stephan, which is December 27, which cheats him out of his day). I might mention, in view of your last paragraph, that Isa means Jesus (my name’s day is December 25, but I celebrate my patron St. John Damacene, December 4).

This day btw, is the beginning of the ecclesiastical Calendar for the Eastern (and I believe Syriac) Orthodox. Its because of the beginning of creation, and that the reading of Christ in the synagogue in Nazareth that He fulfilled in his reading took place this day.
 
I like that you do these commemorations Triune…thank you!
I have learned a lot about the Lutheran side of Christianity because of your wisdom and knowledge and preaching it in a way which I am certain is pleasing to our Lord.

One thing I do not understand is how we got the name Joshua…yet, before translation, that was the name of Jesus, yet somehow we do not call Jesus…Joshua. I guess what I mean is…why do we “translate”/transliterate the name Yeshua to be Joshua for the people with that name in the Bible…yet when it comes to Jesus…Yeshua turns into…well…Jesus.

Am I making sense?..basically…why if this Old Testament Joshua and Jesus actually had the same name…why are their names different when brought into English?

If I need to clarify…please let me know.

On a side note:
Isa Almisry…could you answer me a question? (And no that is not my question…lol)
Why in Arabic is there Yesu and Isa for the name of Jesus…I vaguely know that Yesu is the Christian form and Isa is the Muslim form…but why?

Thanks guys!
 
I like that you do these commemorations Triune…thank you!
I have learned a lot about the Lutheran side of Christianity because of your wisdom and knowledge and preaching it in a way which I am certain is pleasing to our Lord.

One thing I do not understand is how we got the name Joshua…yet, before translation, that was the name of Jesus, yet somehow we do not call Jesus…Joshua. I guess what I mean is…why do we “translate”/transliterate the name Yeshua to be Joshua for the people with that name in the Bible…yet when it comes to Jesus…Yeshua turns into…well…Jesus.

Am I making sense?..basically…why if this Old Testament Joshua and Jesus actually had the same name…why are their names different when brought into English?

If I need to clarify…please let me know.

On a side note:
Isa Almisry…could you answer me a question? (And no that is not my question…lol)
Why in Arabic is there Yesu and Isa for the name of Jesus…I vaguely know that Yesu is the Christian form and Isa is the Muslim form…but why?

Thanks guys!
Joshua in Greek in Iesus. Iesus went to Latin and became Jesus (I may be wrong on the spellings). His actual name, if it were taken straight from Hebrew to English would be Joshua. It’s because of those two intervening steps that we get Jesus. Both would be correct, though.
 
Interesting from an Orthodox perspective, because OT saints are commonplace on our liturgical calendar, but I’ve not seen them on others (though I seem to remember the 80’s revision of the Lutheran Hymnal having them, but that was something new. Where did you get this?
AFAIK the Lutheran calendar of saints in both the LCMS and WELS have always incuded the Old Testament saints. Do the Roman Catholics not celebrate these feast days, and only do it for NT saints?
 
AFAIK the Lutheran calendar of saints in both the LCMS and WELS have always incuded the Old Testament saints. Do the Roman Catholics not celebrate these feast days, and only do it for NT saints?
The Old Testament saints are recognized, but there really are not feast days attributed to them. Normally only New Testament saints. I believe in the Eastern side there are feast days for them though.
Joshua in Greek in Iesus. Iesus went to Latin and became Jesus (I may be wrong on the spellings). His actual name, if it were taken straight from Hebrew to English would be Joshua. It’s because of those two intervening steps that we get Jesus. Both would be correct, though.
What I mean is…why do we not call Jesus…Joshua.
Or why do we not call Joshua…Jesus
See what I mean?
 
I like that you do these commemorations Triune…thank you!
I have learned a lot about the Lutheran side of Christianity because of your wisdom and knowledge and preaching it in a way which I am certain is pleasing to our Lord.

One thing I do not understand is how we got the name Joshua…yet, before translation, that was the name of Jesus, yet somehow we do not call Jesus…Joshua. I guess what I mean is…why do we “translate”/transliterate the name Yeshua to be Joshua for the people with that name in the Bible…yet when it comes to Jesus…Yeshua turns into…well…Jesus.
Jesus is based on the Greek form of the name. In Greek Jesus and Joshua are both Iesus (there is Y in ancient Greek, and no “sh” both of which are in the Hebrew/Aramaic; Greek has to get a declentional ending, Hebrew/Aramaic doesn’t have them). Joshua is based on the Hebrew. Out of honor the Jesus was retained for Jesus, and elsewhere Joshua was used. A relic of the older usage is Sirach, which, not being translated from the Hebrew (which existed, fragments have been found, Talmud refers to it, and it provided the basis for the Amidah, the Jewish Creed recited 3 x a day (except the clause against the minim, Jewish Christians, the rabbis added that later). It is the 'Wisdom of JESUS son of Sirach."

Btw, this squemishness about using the same name is old: Origin (I believe) is the one who points out that Barabbas’ full name was Jesus Barabbas (ie. Jesus Son of the Father), but the Fahters did not want to put him in the same league, so his name was dropped from the texts.
Am I making sense?..basically…why if this Old Testament Joshua and Jesus actually had the same name…why are their names different when brought into English?

If I need to clarify…please let me know.

On a side note:
Isa Almisry…could you answer me a question? (And no that is not my question…lol)
Why in Arabic is there Yesu and Isa for the name of Jesus…I vaguely know that Yesu is the Christian form and Isa is the Muslim form…but why?
Yasu is directly from the Armaic, Isa via Syriac. Both are Christian, but Yasu is used only for God, Isa to name you children after Him (that squemishness again). Since the Muslims don’t recognize the Lord’s divinity, they only use Isa.
 
Thanks!
I should have realized it was the difference from Greek and Hebrew/Aramaic. I still do not understand how a name is translated regardless and how with tradition the way His name is originally pronounced was not passed down through word of mouth…But that topic would be derailing this thread more than it has been.

and I knew I was spelling Yasu wrong with the “e”.

I appreciate the response…

I have said it before:
For an Orthodox Christian…you do Catholic apologetics better than a lot of Catholics…lol!

Thanks again!

Yasu bin Allah!
 
http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo336/catalano2879/joshua_moses.jpg

+ Joshua, Son of Nun +
1 September, Old Testament


No Israelite should have been at all surprised with Joshua’s successes. That’s because Joshua is a shortened form of Jehoshua, which means “Yahweh (the Lord) saves.” Through Joshua, the Lord defeated many armies and enemies, established His people in the promised land, and prepared them for their new life as a nation. This name becomes even dearer to Christians when we realize that the name of Jesus comes from the Greek transliteration of Joshua, “for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved. (Acts 4:12)”
Just to add to what you stated-
**Matthew 1:21
She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus(Joshua), because he will save his people from their sins." **
 
The Roman Martyrology has this commemoration (among others) for 1 September:

In Palestine, the Saints Joshua and Gideon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top