T
TK421
Guest
@Maximilian75 I think it is a universal rule that if there is anyway at all for something to be commercialized, it will happen. Of course, fish on Friday’s goes back to a time when Catholics universally abstained from meat on Friday’s.
I have mentioned before, that the lightness of certain Church laws today can - ironically - make it more difficult in certain ways.
It is much easier to forget about a 1-hour fast than it is to forget a 3-hour fast, or a fast starting at midnight. It is also MUCH easier to forget about Friday abstinence when it is only observed on Lent and can be substituted for other penances outside of Lent. Where I live on the borderlands, you can add to the confusion that in Mexico, you are allowed to consume chicken on Fridays, and many Hispanics might continue that without realizing the difference in law.
As far as the fast, I think this is something that gradually changed because the Latin Church in general was moving towards the promotion of daily reception of the Holy Eucharist (promoted by Pope St Pius X in 1905 in
SACRA TRIDENTINA), and this is something the Church wanted to be more accessible for laity. While a person might theoretically fast for longer as a personal devotion, the canonical requirements were overtime made lighter.
I have mentioned before, that the lightness of certain Church laws today can - ironically - make it more difficult in certain ways.
As far as the fast, I think this is something that gradually changed because the Latin Church in general was moving towards the promotion of daily reception of the Holy Eucharist (promoted by Pope St Pius X in 1905 in
SACRA TRIDENTINA), and this is something the Church wanted to be more accessible for laity. While a person might theoretically fast for longer as a personal devotion, the canonical requirements were overtime made lighter.
Last edited: