K
kristanl
Guest
I was just wondering what it means when it says Christmas Eve commuion service. Is it just the obvious, that you have communion, or is there something special about this?
Wouldn’t you agree, kristanl, that anytime His true and substantial body and blood are offered for us to eat and drink, it is truly indeed something very special?I was just wondering what it means when it says Christmas Eve commuion service. Is it just the obvious, that you have communion, or is there something special about this?
I think you need to provide a little more information.I was just wondering what it means when it says Christmas Eve commuion service. Is it just the obvious, that you have communion, or is there something special about this?
Jon,Wouldn’t you agree, kristanl, that anytime His true and substantial body and blood are offered for us to eat and drink, it is truly indeed something very special?
Jon
There are many denominations out there that offer their version of communion as part of their services on some frequency other than weekly. Some are once a month, some are only a couple of times a year. It varies greatly among various denominations.I meant a non-Catholic service.
Dont think I dont think every Mass is special, I just didnt understand the use of communion service from non-catholic christians.
Usually a Christmas Eve service is a special service that may or may not include communion.I was just wondering what it means when it says Christmas Eve commuion service. Is it just the obvious, that you have communion, or is there something special about this?
Hi 1ke,Jon,
The Eucharist is not present just anytime.
It is present in Churches with valid Holy Orders during Mass or when reserved in the Tabernacle.
If it should become very common, it would change the face of Catholicism.Well, a Catholic “Communion service” is sometimes offered when a priest is not available to say a Mass. A deacon, or even a layman can come in and give some readings, and then distribute pre-consecrated Hosts. This is not a substitute for a Mass, and it is supposed to be a somewhat rare event, in my understanding. That said, they are more common than they used to be.
since you reference non-Catholic denominations I assume it means that, whatever else is part of the worship service, they will also celebrate the Lord’s Supper in the manner of their denomination, including partaking of communion in whatever form they distribute those symbols. It does not of course mean the Eucharist which is a sacrament of Christ’s real sacramental presence only in Catholic and Orthodox churches. Why not call and ask if it is not your regular church?I was just wondering what it means when it says Christmas Eve commuion service. Is it just the obvious, that you have communion, or is there something special about this?
since you reference non-Catholic denominations I assume it means that, whatever else is part of the worship service, they will also celebrate the Lord’s Supper in the manner of their denomination, including partaking of communion in whatever form they distribute those symbols. It does not of course mean the Eucharist which is a sacrament of Christ’s real sacramental presence only in Catholic and Orthodox churches. Why not call and ask if it is not your regular church?
Cardinal RatzingerI count among the most important results of the ecumenical dialogues the insight that the issue of the eucharist cannot be narrowed to the problem of ‘validity.’ Even a theology oriented to the concept of succession, such as that which holds in the Catholic and in the Orthodox church, need not in any way deny the salvation-granting presence of the Lord [Heilschaffende Gegenwart des Herrn] in a Lutheran [evangelische] Lord’s Supper
No, and I wouldn’t expect him to. But, he does recognize the salvation granting presence of Christ in a Lutheran Eucharist. That is a huge statement, indicating a strong presence of the Holy Spirit in the ecumenical dialogues between Lutheran and Catholics. Some posters here seem to take an all or nothing view of Lutheran clergy and sacraments,which is contrary to Cardinal Ratzinger’s, and the USCCB’s positions.It is still not the sacrament of the Eucharist in the full meaning of the Catholic theology of the sacrament, and no where does Ratzinger as Cardinal or Pope say that it is.