Communion under Both Kinds is a fuller form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CommonMan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Brendan,

The literal reading of the passages describing the events of the Lord’s Supper is important. You believe Christ was speaking figuratively. I believe it was all literal. I believe Christ didn’t waste words, or speak in a manner that was unclear. Everything he said should be taken at face value. Everything. Picking and choosing what to believe and what not to just isn’t an option.

The GIRM is correct. We should partake in the “fulller form”. If you disagree, take it up with the authors. They said it.

Snorter Luster. It’s not reserved just for the clergy. The curtain separating God from the people was torn remember? For further evidence, read John 6…
Comman Man
When you become literal it is like you are sewing up the curtain again as yes it has been torn, torn to reveal the understanding of God’s mercy and forgiveness which the literal mind has a hard time comprehending. dessert
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top