Communion wine clergy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rudolph
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
At my parish, both the bread and the wine is offered.
Being an old school Catholic, I only partake in the bread. But that is my choice. Most of the parishioners partake in both.
 
during the Eucharist wine is reserved only for clergy while the lay people take only bread.
this is false.

Neither, the priest nor the lay people partake of bread and wine. All partake of the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus. So if you take only the appearance of wine you are getting the same thing if you only partake of the appearance of bread.
 
In truth, most North American parishes probably offer the chalice to all who wish to receive. There may be exceptions here and there, but I’ve found that to be the general practice these days.
Not so much in Quebec. For a province that is very liberal otherwise, it is curiously conservative on this.

Our abbey used to do so, on many Sundays and always on Holy Thursday at the Mass of the Last Supper but it never does now. The problem is due to the fact that community is aging. When I became an oblate in 2003 there were around 40 monks in choir. Now there are 20 and the average age is now 70, though there are a few young monks. As the community shrinks it seems that the number of people attending grows in reverse proportion! Our area is very touristy and the abbey is a highlight on anyone’s tour, for the Gregorian chant, the cheese, the cider, the orchards. Already at least 4 priest-monks are needed to give communion to the faithful on most Sundays, more on big solemnities. Plus two to give communion to the non-priests monks who do receive in both species. So you would need a minimum of 8 monks to give in both species. Take away the 5 or 6 singing the communion antiphon in the schola, and those too feeble, and that takes a huge bite out of a community of 20-25 priests; we have one deacon; he helps the abbot give communion in the species of wine to the monks; there are no EMHCs. Occasionally there are visiting priests on retreat to help, but still not enough.

As for the parishes, with all their EMHCs, I have no idea why it is so rare to receive in both species. I go to Mass at Sant’ Anselmo in Rome about 10 times a year and we receive in both species although as oblates there, we sit in the choir stalls with the community. The nave is usually empty, as Mass is at 6:20 am (tied with Lauds), except on Sundays.
 
I don’t guy why an anti-Catholic even cares–they think it’s just bread and wine so there’s no real benefit in receiving both
Most mainline protestants believe it’s much more than bread and wine. Even though they don’t believe in (or cause) transsubstantiation, they believe Christ is truly present in the sacrament. They also put special emphasis on the fact that Jesus said that whoever doesn’t eat and drink don’t have life in them. So there’s definitely a need to receive communion, bread and wine both.
 
It is essential for the priest to consume both species. It is not always convenient to distribute both species to the entire congregation.

It is good to know that whether we receive a drop of the Precious Blood, or a crumb of the consecrated bread we receive the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
 
It depends on your parish. Some parish pastors believe that communion should be distributed in one kind (bread only), while others distribute communion in two kinds (bread and wine). I have seen both practices within my locale.
 
Hi…I think when it comes to the precious blood words are important…after the consecration it is the body and blood of Christ. To be continued…🙋 no longer wine…
 
As for the parishes, with all their EMHCs, I have no idea why it is so rare to receive in both species.
I can tell you at some parishes there are lots of EMHCs but a big traffic problem. Some of the older churches were really set up to use the altar rail, not to have lines of people trooping up; the aisles are narrow and if the older church has a large crowd, there’s no practical place to put EMHCs with chalices for people to receive the Body, then step to receive the Blood, and then get back to their seat. One old church that has this problem in a big way never offers the chalice on Sundays but often offers both forms at the daily Masses, which have a smaller crowd and are said in the basement chapel that was designed in the mid-century with wider aisles and a lot more space up front.
 
I agree in many cases practical limitations preclude the Precious Blood for the faithful, but none of the parishes I’ve been to in the last couple of years would logistics be a problem. And I’ve been to quite a few with our Gregorian a schola. There’s usually plenty of room, plenty of EMHCs (more than truly required in fact, in most cases!), and few faithful.

Modernist that I am, I like receiving the Precious Blood, especially when the communion antiphon is in Gregorian chant 😉

Honestly the cynic in me says that the real reason is that it is an obstacle to the “read, feed, and speed creed” that seems to exist around here in order to meet the unwritten goal of having Mass over and done with in 50 minutes.

Or it could be that the EMHCs are mostly doddery old guys and gals like me who are concerned about spilling the Precious Blood 🧓
 
I almost saw a priest at a concelebrated bishop’s Mass take a header with the entire chalice a month or two ago. He obviously wasn’t familiar with the church and didn’t realize there was a step when he was coming out of the sanctuary. Fortunately he caught himself in time or he would have baptized in Jesus’ blood the priest distributing the Body of Christ in front of him. I believe a tiny speck of the Precious Blood flew onto me as I did feel a sprinkle.
 
I almost saw a priest at a concelebrated bishop’s Mass take a header with the entire chalice a month or two ago. He obviously wasn’t familiar with the church and didn’t realize there was a step when he was coming out of the sanctuary. Fortunately he caught himself in time or he would have baptized in Jesus’ blood the priest distributing the Body of Christ in front of him. I believe a tiny speck of the Precious Blood flew onto me as I did feel a sprinkle.
One of the LEMs at my church tried to drown me with the cup last week. Almost spilled it everywhere.

ETA: That’s “lay Eucharistic minister,” our term for EMHCs.
 
Last edited:
The first thing that popped in my mind was the NASA acronym LEM for “Lunar Excursion Module”
We must be of the same era 😉

Spent long hours as a kid watching the Gemini and Apollo expeditions on TV (a bit too young to remember the Mercury space flights).
 
I was too tiny to appreciate that it was a big deal that men walked on the moon. When you are a young child and men are in space on the news every night and on “I Dream of Jeannie”, you just figure people go into space all the time, it’s normal. I did go to Adult Spacecamp a few decades ago though.
 
I was 11 when Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon. You can imagine an 11 y.o. boy would be impressed!

To the OP, sorry for the thread drift… hit with a splash of nostalgia.

To add a liturgical twist, it’s amazing to realize that the first time on the moon was before the Mass of Paul VI was promulgated!!!
 
I almost saw a priest at a concelebrated bishop’s Mass take a header with the entire chalice a month or two ago.
This is why I advocate against the laity receiving under both species. It sets up so many openings for accidents or mishandling of the precious blood.
 
This is why I advocate against the laity receiving under both species. It sets up so many openings for accidents or mishandling of the precious blood.
Advocating? Are you a bishop? A priest? Isn’t it a bishop’s job to decide what is fitting -or not- for his flock? Or do you mean you wrote to your bishop to give him your opinion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top