Communion without 'first communion'

[stuartc]

Would it be ok to receive communion, in a state of grace of course, without having undergone the rite of first communion? Would this be a case of ‘valid but illicit’ as I assume the validlity of the Eucharistic sacrament would take precedent over the initiation rite of first communion?

Thoughts please

 

[runningdude]

Being in a state of grace, I assume this means you’ve been to confession. I’d recommend asking the priest next time you go!

 

[GelasianumVetus]

There is no rite of first Communion. If someone has been initiated into the Church, is in full communion with the Church, and meets the requirements for admission to Communion under the law of his/her particular Church, that person may receive Communion.

Whenever someone first receives Communion, that is their “first” Communion. The only difference is that, if not done as a special event, it would be celebrated with somewhat less solemnity.

 

[Catholic1954]

I’m not sure what you mean. Catholics must go through a period of preparation in order to receive Communion for the first time.

 

[DavidFilmer]

I presume you are talking about someone who is raised Catholic but never underwent a regular First Holy Communion class, but at some point presented himself for Communion (which becomes, for him, his First Holy Communion, though maybe he is the only one who is aware of that fact).

This is irregular, but it is neither invalid nor illicit, provided the recipient has attended First Confession prior to receiving [per CCC 1457].

Canon Law (#914) requires Pastors (and parents) to make instruction available to children, but imposes no obligation for children to attend classes.

This is the only circumstance I can imagine where a Catholic in good standing who is old enough to receive Communion has not already made his First Holy Communion in the customary manner.