D
Dokimas
Guest
Dokimas;6112851:
I’m not sure I missed those verses. A symbol of the Crucifixion of the Lord should not be taken lightly. Remember the so called ‘art’ exhibit that had a crucifix in a jar of urine. Was that offensive? Of course it was. It’s ‘only’ a symbol but what it symbolizes is the ONLY way of salvation given to humans by God.You are missing a HUGE part of Paul’s thoughts on the Eucharist/communion. Hopefully not on purpose:
Therefore whoever eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord in an un-worthy manner will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.
- 1 Cor 11:27
A person should examine himself, and so eat the bread and drink the cup.
-1 Cor 11:28
For he who eats and drinks in an unworthy manner eats and drinks judgment to himself, not discerning the Lord’s body.
- 1 Corinthians 11:29
Doesn’t sound like simple symbolism to me. Hopefully you can explain this instead of look over it. If it were a simple symbol…why would one have to examine yourself? Couldn’t you just eat a symbol that meant nothing more than a symbol? I think you could…if that is all it was. Not to mention the very fact that Christ’s own disciples left him due to his teaching on the Eucharist/communion. some of them at least They were appalled that he would say such a thing. Yet, Christ did not explain himself further, he stuck by what he said, it was not a parable it was meant as he said it was.
See John 6. 60: "Then many of his disciples who were listening said, “This saying is hard; who can accept it?”
John 6. 66: “As a result of this many of his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him”