N
nitesnake
Guest
I will only receive Holy Communion from a deacon or priest. Never a Eucharistic layman.
Is this wrong?
Is this wrong?
For your information there is no such thing as a Eucharistic layman. The priest is the Eucharistic Minister and the lay people are EMHC’s (Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion).I will only receive Holy Communion from a deacon or priest. Never a Eucharistic layman.
Is this wrong?
While it certainly is not traditional for laymen to give the Eucharist, Christ is still Christ and I would rather receive from a layman than not at all.I will only receive Holy Communion from a deacon or priest. Never a Eucharistic layman.
Is this wrong?
It really depends on why you do that. If it’s just your preference, that’s fine, you have that right. On the other hand, if you’re saying that EMHC are not valid, that’s different, because you’d be saying that the Church allows something that’s wrong.I will only receive Holy Communion from a deacon or priest. Never a Eucharistic layman.
Is this wrong?
No, your job is to do what the pastor says as long as he isn’t asking you to violate Church Law or the Rubrics of the Mass. We are not nondenominational Protestants. We have higher authorities than the local pastor and if we know father is doing something he shouldn’t be we ought to (after addressing it with him in a very cordial manner) seek resolution from our Bishop.Your job is to do what the pastor says, take no notice of anyone else.
I’ve seen EMCHs toss back the Precious Blood like they were downing a shot of whiskey as they were walking back to the credence table or the altar. That is totally unacceptable. But reverently consuming the remaining Precious Blood by the altar and placing the Chalice on the corporal for the priest to purify it is perfectly OK.I have a question I hope others can help me with. I am a Extra Ordinary Minister of Holy Communion. I distributed the Most Precious a Blood to our parishioners and as requested by our pastor, I consumed what was left. I had someone tell me that I should NOT have consumed it (standing off to the side) of the altar. I am very upset by this comment as I was told by my pastor to consume it but he did not specify where. I thought I was doing the right thing at the correct place.please help if you can!
If by this, you mean that you always make sure to get in the line served y the priest or deacon, I do not see a problem with it.I will only receive Holy Communion from a deacon or priest. Never a Eucharistic layman.
Is this wrong?
As others have said, it depends on your reason. It’s still the Body and Blood of Christ no matter who is administering it. If it makes you feel special because you received the Body from the priest or deacon, are you disappointed when you receive the Blood from an Extraordinary Minister? What would you do if there was no priest or deacon? There was an elderly chaplain who would visit our parish and because of his age he would sit down during Holy Communion and let the Extraordinary Ministers administer the Eucharist. Of course you may not know he was going to do that until you are at that point in the Mass, and I hope you don’t walk out of Mass just because you can’t receive Holy Communion from a priest or deacon. I think it’s wrong to speak in absolutes. You may prefer to receive it from the ordained, but there may come a situation when you can’t.I will only receive Holy Communion from a deacon or priest. Never a Eucharistic layman.
Is this wrong?
That would be amazing to have every parish have an army of priests and deacons for every Mass. Unfortunately, not every place has such a luxury. I hear down in Mexico some priests give 10 Masses every Sunday. And without enough assisting priests and deacons Mass would take forever.In the Byzantine Catholic parishes, it is still only bishops, priests, and deacons are allowed to give the Eucharist. At my parish, if the deacon has the flu, we wait twice as long for Communion to be distributed (and I would not change it for the world).![]()
That’s what it feels like when I have to consume what’s left over in my chalice. We joke about how the other parishioners think we must like serving so we can get a little tipsy. Usually we try to ask the Hospitality Ministers to consume the last of it because they are the last to receive Holy Communion at our parish, or whoever is last to receive if there isn’t too much left. Or we ask the other Extraordinary Ministers who have already gone back to their seats (we’re required to sit together in the front). If those options are not available then I go to the credence table and consume the last of the Blood. I consume it over the credence in case I were to spill some.I’ve seen EMCHs toss back the Precious Blood like they were downing a shot of whiskey as they were walking back to the credence table or the altar. That is totally unacceptable. But reverently consuming the remaining Precious Blood by the altar and placing the Chalice on the corporal for the priest to purify it is perfectly OK.
I have a question I hope others can help me with. I am a Extra Ordinary Minister of Holy Communion. I distributed the Most Precious a Blood to our parishioners and as requested by our pastor, I consumed what was left. I had someone tell me that I should NOT have consumed it (standing off to the side) of the altar. I am very upset by this comment as I was told by my pastor to consume it but he did not specify where. I thought I was doing the right thing at the correct place.please help if you can!
I can promise you if you bring this to the diocesan bishop as a “violation of Church law” he will chase you out and back to your pastor whom he entrust with these type issues.No, your job is to do what the pastor says as long as he isn’t asking you to violate Church Law or the Rubrics of the Mass. We are not nondenominational Protestants. We have higher authorities than the local pastor and if we know father is doing something he shouldn’t be we ought to (after addressing it with him in a very cordial manner) seek resolution from our Bishop.
We only have one priest and one deacon.That would be amazing to have every parish have an army of priests and deacons for every Mass. Unfortunately, not every place has such a luxury. I hear down in Mexico some priests give 10 Masses every Sunday. And without enough assisting priests and deacons Mass would take forever.
This would be the most desirable, but unfortunately in these days of 86 EMHC at every Mass, it would be a logistical nightmare. We have a credence table off to the back of the altar out of sight of the people that we instruct our EMHC to go to then after Mass, at the request of our bishop, the vessels are purified by me or an acolyte.I’ve seen EMCHs toss back the Precious Blood like they were downing a shot of whiskey as they were walking back to the credence table or the altar. That is totally unacceptable. But reverently consuming the remaining Precious Blood by the altar and placing the Chalice on the corporal for the priest to purify it is perfectly OK.
I’m lucky, we only have 2 EMCHs in our parish at the Sunday Mass and they are both ministers of the Cup. We only have 1 at the Saturday evening Mass.This would be the most desirable, but unfortunately in these days of 86 EMHC at every Mass, it would be a logistical nightmare. We have a credence table off to the back of the altar out of sight of the people that we instruct our EMHC to go to then after Mass, at the request of our bishop, the vessels are purified by me or an acolyte.