R
Riley259
Guest
This question has probably been dealt with alot on this forum and I’m familiar with the standard answers given but somehow I’m still not satisfied yet. My question concerns the fate of those who engage in some gravely sinful activity without repentence. The simple answer is that those who does this without repentence will be condemned to Hell. However, there are a myriad of reasons why a person might not be as culpable as it may appear. To take an extreme example…what about someone who engages in serial killing but due to their abusive background, compromised psychiatric status, and distorted idea of right and wrong and their lack of knowledge of God or His potential to forgive…does someone like this automatically go to Hell after they die in a state of mortal sin? I realize this example is an outlier but there are many situations where a gray area of culpability exists …at what point is the person freely choosing to do evil or even has knowledge that it is seriously evil. How about the millions of people who don’t know Christ or even God and don’t have the advantage that us Catholics or Christians do in terms of a revealed moral code. I know that God has inscribed a moral code on all of our hearts but the potential for this becoming faded or blocked out is so great in this very confused world and greater for someone who through no fault of their own had a compromised upbringing that challenged their ability to discern true right and wrong. How is this ultimately sorted out in a fair and just way? Given God’s all powerful and infinite nature, perhaps He is able to justly sort this out and in the end they’ll be no complaints of unfairness, etc. in how everyone was judged but from my vantage point it seem so difficult to do…I guess that’s why He’s God and I’m not. Perhaps I answered my own question but feedback and discussion is welcome.