F
FrDavid96
Guest
I just realized something as I re-read your posts. In them, you always seem to say that she spoke “to you.” Have you asked a priest to speak with her specifically about this? More importantly, have you asked your pastor himself to speak with her? Is that even possible, or does she live too far away? Perhaps her memory will clear up a little if she’s speaking directly to a priest…especially a priest who is explaining that he wants to do things right and supply the rites of the Church, and therefore needs to know exactly what happened.Yes of course.
When I intially asked her about it she said she used the trinitarian formula and water. But, when asked to write it down to give as evidence to the priest she became uneasy and claimed no longer to remember whether or not she used water.
One of two things is happening:
Nevertheless, I believe my priest is correct in ruling conditional baptism as necessary in my case.
- What she says is true and she cannot remember.
- She believes that because the baptism was not performed by a priest it is invalid, and sees the only way to have me baptized “properly” is to say she never did. (This is evidenced by the many times she petitioned my parents to have a priest baptize me as a young child.) In my conversation with her, she claims to have “conditionally baptized” me with the intent that a priest would do it properly later on. I explained to her that it didn’t work this way and the first baptism would be considered valid. This was when her memory became fuzzy.
If I found myself in that situation, I would not approach it from the point of view of trying to convince her that baptism is not necessary, and I’m trying to prove it’s unnecessary.
I personally would approach it by saying that it’s important for me to do things the right way when I supply the rites of the Church for your grandson, so please try to remember and be very specific.
That’s just what I might do in a similar situation.