Condom Use

[Magnavox]

To the multiple people who asked me why, another reason its hard to say this where it isn’t disgusting but I will try.

Say a married couple want to have intercourse but the wife doesn’t want to ‘drain’ all day, or wear a pad, because it makes her feel nasty or dirty.

A perforated condom would allow the possibility of pregnancy, but at the same time prevent her from feeling nasty all day.

So the intention is not birth control. The intention is allowing the possibility of pregnancy to occur without making the wife go through her day with ill feelings.

Sounds morally acceptable to me, when you consider allowing for the sake of a test.

 

[Magnavox]

Guess nobody wants to respond to this example…

 

[shipwrkd]

So the intention is not birth control. The intention is allowing the possibility of pregnancy to occur without making the wife go through her day with ill feelings.

Sounds morally acceptable to me, when you consider allowing for the sake of a test.

I’ll second that. JPII in one of his earlier books said it was the husbands duty to bring the wife to climax. If a “textured” condom with the tip missing helps that, what’s the problem. Seems the same as using a personal lubricant to relieve pain for your wife and personal lubricants are now made to enhance pleasure and performance…is this any different then using a different position? There are moral theologians that say as long as your open to procreation and not preventing it, anything goes…between a consenting husband and wife, of course.