Confessing every sin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HJ3822
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

HJ3822

Guest
The title is the most succinct title I can think of. The more lengthy title would be: “Does a cradle Catholic have to confess every sin since birth or every sin since the day of Confirmation?” This question can also be extended to prospective Catholic converts: “Does a prospective Catholic convert have to confess every sin since birth or just merely every sin since the day of conversion or the day of his or her Confirmation/Baptism?”

Now, you may wonder why I am asking this question. Here is the backstory. Recently, I re-visited Isaac Newton’s list of 48 sins he had committed by the time he turned 19 or 20. Then, it occurred to me that I had committed the same kind of wrongs in my relatively short life of two decades and four years, and for that reason, I felt very empathetic toward Isaac Newton. The list of sins made him very human. Likewise, I have been thinking of recording every single moral wrong in my life, but I don’t know where to start. The number of wrongs that I have greatly exceeds 48, and upon retrospection, I think the majority of them is tied to my lack of good social graces in real life and on the Internet. On the Internet, I believe that I step the social boundaries far too often because of my lack of emotional maturity and social intelligence. In real life, I believe that the same applies. There is one moment in my life that I remember very vividly. I was behaving very immaturely next to my classmate, bordering on teasing. I think I was a junior in high school at the time, and I had known the classmate since my freshman year. The classmate did not seem to be offended, and I took the lack of offense as a license to continue my teasing behavior. However, what makes in-person interactions different from online interactions is that, in my experience, in-person interactions allows people to express annoyance immediately. I usually take the hint and stop what I am doing. On the Internet, experience tells me that people generally don’t express any annoyance at all. Hence, it is extremely easy to offend people without realizing it, and when I do realize it, it’s already too late. Additionally, I tend to control my temper very well in in-person interactions, but in online interactions, the perception of anonymity is likely the cause for my bold, angry behavior. I think of myself as a “Jekyll and Hyde” type of person as a result.

In contrast to Isaac Newton, who may have been baptized and raised in the Church of England, I have never been baptized or raised by whatever church. In the realm of theology, I admire both the Lutheran school of thought and Catholic school of thought, and I am fascinated by the order, discipline, and intricacy of high-church liturgy, which is characteristic of Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and high-church Protestant churches. Now, if I choose to convert officially to the Roman Catholic Church, then I may have to take on some Catholic responsibilities, like attending Mass, tithing, or honoring the sacraments, including the sacrament of penance. And if I were to do the sacrament of penance, I may have to confess all my sins to God by means of the priest. There are some serious, practical concerns that I have about that type of scenario:
  1. Does one have to confess ALL sins since birth or since the day of Confirmation?
  2. If the confessions are directed at God, and only God can forgive sins, then what is the purpose of having a priest to hear your shameful thoughts and actions? Is the priest only there to judge your sincerity? What if the priest perceives that you are not being sincere? Can the priest refuse to absolve?
  3. How detailed does a confession have to be? Do people generally confess the overarching themes behind the sinful behaviors or thoughts, which may be the root of the problem, or do they confess the individual thoughts and behaviors?
  4. James 5:16 says, “Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.” How should a Catholic behave in light of this verse? Is prayer and confession of one’s sins to God directly and to the wronged person enough to be forgiven? Or perhaps, the priest is there to realize godly forgiveness?
 
The title is the most succinct title I can think of. The more lengthy title would be: “Does a cradle Catholic have to confess every sin since birth or every sin since the day of Confirmation?”
One must confess only those mortal sins committed since their last confession, though it is a good practice to confess venial sins as well.
 
Too bad your original post wasn’t as succinct as the title…sorry, I lost interest after the first 10 sentences. 😛
 
You stated you were never baptized. If you were to convert to Catholicism, the first sacrament you would receive would be baptism, prior to the sacrament of reconciliation. This washes away the stain of original sin, as well as any and all venial and mortal sins committed throughout your life. You would not need to confess any sin committed prior to your baptism. Only those committed after. Also, through confession, remember that the priest is in persona Christi, or in the person of Christ. You ARE confessing your sins directly to God. (Lk 10:16). “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.”
 
  1. Does one have to confess ALL sins since birth or since the day of Confirmation?
Neither. You confess all mortal sins (in kind and number to the best of your ability) since your last confession, or in the case of your first confession, since your baptism.
  1. If the confessions are directed at God, and only God can forgive sins, then what is the purpose of having a priest to hear your shameful thoughts and actions? Is the priest only there to judge your sincerity? What if the priest perceives that you are not being sincere? Can the priest refuse to absolve?
The priest is there with the authority given to the apostles by Jesus to forgive sins. If you were making a mockery of the sacrament in some way, a priest could tell you such and not offer absolution. If you are sincerely approaching the sacrament, this is not an issue.
  1. How detailed does a confession have to be? Do people generally confess the overarching themes behind the sinful behaviors or thoughts, which may be the root of the problem, or do they confess the individual thoughts and behaviors?
The confession should be detailed enough so the priest knows what it is you were doing. It need not be “graphically detailed.” The priest will usually ask for more detail if it is necessary. Having a regular confessor / spiritual director helps identify related and habitual sins that you need to work on.
  1. James 5:16 says, “Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person is powerful and effective.” How should a Catholic behave in light of this verse? Is prayer and confession of one’s sins to God directly and to the wronged person enough to be forgiven? Or perhaps, the priest is there to realize godly forgiveness?
Prayer to God and asking the injured party are a start, but the Catholic teaching is you also must confess mortal sins to a priest to receive absolution.

I strongly suggest you go to a local Catholic parish and ask about the RCIA program. The RCIA program begins with an inquiry phase where people new to the faith have a chance to ask these kinds of questions (and lots more). At the very least, speaking with a local priest or director of faith formation will give you answers to your questions and a local contact for any additional questions.

Peace,

Deacon Patrick
 
I suggest reading the following Apologist commentary:

ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/when-you-dont-have-to-say-something-in-confession

jimmyakin.com/2006/07/a_reader_writes-4.html

jimmyakin.com/2007/03/specific_confes.html

Also, I would add that if one goes to Confession with the intent of confessing all mortal sins and believes he/she confessed them all, then it’s hard for me to see how that would invalidate a Confession.

I would further add that it is not unusual for people (especially those who join the Church as adults or who have not been to Confession in 20 years or so) to confess sins in the past. There’s nothing awkward about it that should alarm a priest. The only thing is one goes to Confession and has never been there before or it’s been a long time, it may be good to mention that, because it gives the priest a sense that the penitent didn’t commit say 15 mortal sins in the span of a week.
 
I suggest reading the following Apologist commentary:

ncregister.com/blog/jimmy-akin/when-you-dont-have-to-say-something-in-confession

jimmyakin.com/2006/07/a_reader_writes-4.html

jimmyakin.com/2007/03/specific_confes.html

Also, I would add that if one goes to Confession with the intent of confessing all mortal sins and believes he/she confessed them all, then it’s hard for me to see how that would invalidate a Confession.

I would further add that it is not unusual for people (especially those who join the Church as adults or who have not been to Confession in 20 years or so) to confess sins in the past. There’s nothing awkward about it that should alarm a priest. The only thing is one goes to Confession and has never been there before or it’s been a long time, it may be good to mention that, because it gives the priest a sense that the penitent didn’t commit say 15 mortal sins in the span of a week.
The usual formula is : “Bless me Father for I have sinned. It has been ____________since my last confession.”

You insert…a week, a month, 20 years or I’m a convert, this is my first confession.

The priest should help you if you’ve never been to confession.
 
All mortal sins that one has committed (see Catechism or Compendium on what that is) - (after Baptism) need to be confessed (in number and kind and if there is something that changes the kind…like it was a Church you burned down…)

If one forgets a mortal sin -one is to confess it in the next confession (hiding one is a very different matter).

Venial sins need not be confessed but it is good to do so on a regular basis.
 
Succinctly, No.
Only mortal sins. Those are the ones that go against the Ten Commandments (for example).

You must know that sin is a serious sin and you must decide to do it anyway.

If you can’t decide if you’ve done a mortal sin then have the priest let you know what he thinks. It may be a good idea to get a spiritual advisor as through your descriptions it sounds like there is some scrupulosity there, although it may be a simple matter of not knowing the difference between mortal and venial sin.
 

Likewise, I have been thinking of recording every single moral wrong in my life, but I don’t know where to start. …
I may have to confess all my sins to God by means of the priest. …
I have never been baptized or raised by whatever church…
First things first, you need baptism, at which time it is appropriate to be sorry for all sins of your life, yet they do not need to be confessed to a priest unless they occur after baptism (and are serious). From the Catechism of the Catholic Church 1216, quoting St. Gregory Of Nazianzus:Baptism is God’s most beautiful and magnificent gift. . . .We call it gift, grace, anointing, enlightenment, garment of immortality, bath of rebirth, seal, and most precious gift. It is called
  • *gift *because it is conferred on those who bring nothing of their own;
  • *grace *since it is given even to the guilty;
  • *Baptism *because sin is buried in the water;
  • *anointing *for it is priestly and royal as are those who are anointed;
  • *enlightenment *because it radiates light;
  • *clothing *since it veils our shame;
  • *bath *because it washes; and
  • *seal *as it is our guard and the sign of God’s Lordship.10
10 St. Gregory Of Nazianzus, Oratio 40,3-4:PG 36,361C.

Also from the Catechism:1213 Holy Baptism is the basis of the whole Christian life, the gateway to life in the Spirit (vitae spiritualis ianua),4 and the door which gives access to the other sacraments. Through Baptism we are freed from sin and reborn as sons of God; we become members of Christ, are incorporated into the Church and made sharers in her mission: "Baptism is the sacrament of regeneration through water in the word."5

4 Cf. Council Of Florence: DS 1314: vitae spiritualis ianua.
5 Roman Catechism II,2,5; Cf. Council Of Florence: DS 1314; CIC, cann. 204 § 1; 849; CCEO, can. 675 § 1
 
@HJ3822,

Did this help answer your questions? We hope things are well with you and will keep you in our prayers.
 
Only mortal sins. Those are the ones that go that against the Ten Commandments (for example).

You must know that sin is a serious sin and you must decide to do it anyway.

If you can’t decide if you’ve done a mortal sin then have the priest let you know what he thinks. It may be a good idea to get a spiritual advisor as through your descriptions it sounds like there is some scrupulosity there, although it may be a simple matter of not knowing the difference between mortal and venial sin.
Just to clarify: it is possible to violate the 10 Commandments in ways both venial and mortal. The catechism explains the substantial amount of ground they cover.
 
Just to clarify: it is possible to violate the 10 Commandments in ways both venial and mortal. The catechism explains the substantial amount of ground they cover.
Yes, I would say so…Take “Thou Shalt not Kill.” - mortal sin! You might punch someone out of anger…& leave it at that…- venial sin!
 
The catechism explains the substantial amount of ground they cover.
Catechism:

The obligation of the Decalogue

2072 Since they express man’s fundamental duties towards God and towards his neighbor, the Ten Commandments reveal, in their primordial content, grave obligations. They are fundamentally immutable, and they oblige always and everywhere. No one can dispense from them. The Ten Commandments are engraved by God in the human heart.

2073 Obedience to the Commandments also implies obligations in matter which is, in itself, light. Thus abusive language is forbidden by the fifth commandment, but would be a grave offense only as a result of circumstances or the offender’s intention.

scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2.htm
 
Catechism:

The obligation of the Decalogue

2072 Since they express man’s fundamental duties towards God and towards his neighbor, the Ten Commandments reveal, in their primordial content, grave obligations. They are fundamentally immutable, and they oblige always and everywhere. No one can dispense from them. The Ten Commandments are engraved by God in the human heart.

2073 Obedience to the Commandments also implies obligations in matter which is, in itself, light. Thus abusive language is forbidden by the fifth commandment, but would be a grave offense only as a result of circumstances or the offender’s intention.

scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2.htm
Thank you! That text explains my point very clearly.
 
I’d recommend this simple and inexpensive little book to answer all of your questions, OP: amazon.com/Go-Peace-Guide-Purpose-Confession/dp/1932927956

As an aside, Confession is one of my most favorite things about being Catholic, and it’s truly worked wonders in my life. I couldn’t even begin to imagine what life would be like without it, or how I ever survived before it. Fears associated with it are unfounded …

… but understanding all of this and viewing it from this perspective, as far as I can tell, really requires the grace of God and to first be in a state of grace. This is just one of those things you have to try first, and understanding it theoretically is kind of like understanding theoretically what it’s like to taste chocolate. But don’t be afraid.
 
I’d recommend this simple and inexpensive little book to answer all of your questions, OP: amazon.com/Go-Peace-Guide-Purpose-Confession/dp/1932927956

As an aside, Confession is one of my most favorite things about being Catholic, and it’s truly worked wonders in my life. I couldn’t even begin to imagine what life would be like without it, or how I ever survived before it. Fears associated with it are unfounded …

… but understanding all of this and viewing it from this perspective, as far as I can tell, really requires the grace of God and to first be in a state of grace. This is just one of those things you have to try first, and understanding it theoretically is kind of like understanding theoretically what it’s like to taste chocolate. But don’t be afraid.
👍👍👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top