But your example is still faulty because we are not referring to empirical qualities, but to entities.
I’ve already addressed this. In fact, it just hearkens to Havard’s words a few posts back.
Empiricism is irrelevant. We are Catholics and hence, this whole discussion is on the assumption that demons are as real as the color red is real.
As much as Jharek may believe he is not educated as we are, he in fact illustrates the point quite nicely with his example of different languages having different names for God.
Does the fact that I call God “Panginoon” in my language whilst a Japanese Catholic would call him perhaps, “Kami-sama” change the nature of God or simply the sounds and symbols we use as a
sign to point towards the concept who is our Almighty Father?
Why is it so hard to understand the simple fact that there is a Norse god of Justice named Tyr. In the FRCS there is a god of Justice named Tyr. Both are depicted as having one hand. But you claim there is no connection whatsoever between the two?
By fact you mean the ancient vikings came up with a fictional deity who sacrificed his hand to the monstrous wolf Fenrir so that the gods may bind the beast? Yes.
The tale itself though? Fiction. The god? Well until you answer my questions regarding where to find a one-handed deity capable of masterful, Norsemen-style combat, he will remain as fictional as the stories themselves.
As far as a connection, no there isn’t a connection. The god Tyr in
DnD is a separate entity from the “real” god in “real” Norse myth purely because he is already in a universe that is separate from reality. Why is it so hard for
you to understand that you are clearly demonstrating your incapacity to distinguish fiction from fact?
You know there’s an evil dragon goddess named Tiamat in the
DnD universe as well right? However, if you actually read about the original Tiamat of the
Enuma Elish, she doesn’t take any form that even remotely resembles a five-headed dragon (much less one with different colored heads). I should know, I did a short paper that contrasted and compared the fictional Tiamat of
DnD and the mythical Tiamat of the ancient Babylonians. It got decent marks, if that means anything.