A
anikins
Guest
I’m fine with either. I travel a lot and have found that most parishes world wide offer both options.
The person confessing must always be given the option of a screen. More than one have posted they do not offer it in their parish. I ran into this at my parish years ago. Contact your pastor and tell him politely that a screen must be provided, and bring the supporting documents…There used to be a priest at my old parish who used to sit on the opposite side where the penitent usually sat to make the person do face to face. It always made me extremely uncomfortable because I’m pretty darn shy as it is. I wouldn’t look him in the eye because of my shyness and he again made me feel twice as uncomfortable by asking if I was hiding something because I wasn’t looking at him. I really hope my new confessor allows me to use the screen.
No, it was St. Charles Borromeo in the 16th Century, but only in his diocese. It was sometime later that the screen became the norm for the entire Latin Church.Thank you. Yes. Wasn’t it St Augustine who changed it to private screen?
The USCCB link you provided says, “Provision should also be made for penitents who wish to confess face-to-face …”The priest not offering face to face is completely within his rights.
I’m kind of surprised, given the number of times priests have heard my confession outside of a confessional.Confessions are not to be heard outside a confessional without a just cause. (Can. 964:3)
I would think that would be really creepy.If there is ever a situation where a woman kneels / sits behind the screen and the priest says, “come around so I can see you during your confession”
Wow – I didn’t realize this was part of Canon law:
“Just cause” is a pretty low standard in canon law. Many reasons are acceptable - time constraints, location, claustrophobia - basically, any good reason in the judgement of the priest. If you approach a priest for confession in a private home, for example, he’s not required to say “Let’s drive to the Church to find a confessional.” It would be a far greater problem to deny a person the chance to confess because of the lack of a confessional.Confessions are not to be heard outside a confessional without a just cause. (Can. 964:3)
Wow – I didn’t realize this was part of Canon law:
As someone else said, the “just cause” is a pretty loose. This is more about preventing priests from having regularly scheduled confessions in other places, like in the pews, on walks, etc – like you sometimes see in movies.Confessions are not to be heard outside a confessional without a just cause. (Can. 964:3)
True. A parish should allow from face-to-face (even if just though appointments). But an individual priest may require the screen if he knows his body language can be off putting.I_trust:![]()
The USCCB link you provided says, “Provision should also be made for penitents who wish to confess face-to-face …”The priest not offering face to face is completely within his rights.
I’ve met that priest a few times.True. A parish should allow from face-to-face (even if just though appointments). But an individual priest may require the screen if he knows his body language can be off putting.