P
Pete_1
Guest
I know we are oblidged to confess past mortal sins, but are we obliged to confess actions that were grave matter but you did not know so at the time?
thanks,
thanks,
this is where the full knowledge debate comes into play. You will get mixed messages from this forum. Even canon lawyers argue about his.I know we are oblidged to confess past mortal sins, but are we obliged to confess actions that were grave matter but you did not know so at the time?
thanks,
Ok then saying you did not know whatsoever that the action was wrong (notice I did not say sinfull), would you still be obliged to confess?this is where the full knowledge debate comes into play. You will get mixed messages from this forum. Even canon lawyers argue about his.
The debate is does full knowledge mean that one is aware that somthing is a sin or does full knowledge also add the requirement that the sinner must be aware the matter is grave.
I personally think the latter gives wayward souls an out for willingly ignoring the spirit and allowing for a poorly formed conscience…the conscience is a pupil not a teacher…and the individual should take full blame themselves for a poorly formed conscience. EVERYONE recieves grace…not everyone accepts and answers grace.
One does not have to be a Catholic to be in Mortal sin.
I have talked to women who were in that boat and even though they marching along with the secular world they knew at the time they were doing somthing seriously wrong…the second can happen to someone who has had no religious upbringing and at the time accepts the secular view. I can’t even imagine what else could be a mortal sin but a person wouldn’t know it.
Obliged? in doubt.I know we are oblidged to confess past mortal sins, but are we obliged to confess actions that were grave matter but you did not know so at the time?
thanks,