Conflicted Mormon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tweedle_Dee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’m more curious about the part where it says to use tobacco on bruises and all sick cattle, as well as using “strong drinks” (alcohol) to wash the body.

:rolleyes:
True. In all my years as a LDS, I never saw any Mormon wash himself with Jack Daniels or dose his cattle with Lucky Strikes. 😃
 
True. In all my years as a LDS, I never saw any Mormon wash himself with Jack Daniels or dose his cattle with Lucky Strikes. 😃
When I as a teenage mormon, my mormon friends participated in the fad of washing hair with beer.

:rotfl:

Not allowed at my house of course. 🙂
 
When I as a teenage mormon, my mormon friends participated in the fad of washing hair with beer.
Sounds like a waste of perfectly good beer! I wonder how much of the beer accidentally got in their mouths? 😃
 
Tweedle_Dee-I’ve been conflicted for a very long time and I feel I need to figure this out. I’ve gradually drifted away from Mormonism (although I go to church with my wife every Sunday) but not sure where the truth lies. I see a lot of problems with Mormonism said:
Mt. 11: 25-26 “At that time Jesus declared, "I thank thee, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that thou hast hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to babes; yea, Father, for such was thy gracious will. All things have been delivered to me by my Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and any one to whom the Son chooses to reveal him."

2nd. Cor.11: 12 “And what I do I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do. 13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.”

2 Cor. 4: 2 “We have renounced disgraceful, underhanded ways; we refuse to practice cunning or to tamper with God’s word, but by the open statement of the truth we would commend ourselves to every man’s conscience in the sight of God. 3 And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled only to those who are perishing.


***Mr. Smith, like Luther, Calvin and others before him, simply refused the graces offered to him for his own salvation. As a result God “heardened his heart, and darkened his mind.”

This is far more common than one might expect. In a period of only 400 years there are now in excess of 30,000 different Protestant religions, each claiming “the truth.” And yet the Catholic Church [historically proveable] was the One Church founded by Christ, and has served Jesus for some 2,000 consecutative years under an unbrokem line of Popes, Benedict being # 265.👍

Further the Bible is a Catholic Book, the NT was written entirely by Catholics, and doctrines and dogma that go back 2,000 years are still in effect today:) Only The Holy Spirit can make that happen.***

The most compelling reason though is that as you know, Mormons deny God [as a Diety] and Jesus as Lord [also a diety]. One cannot get to the after life denying the presence of God.

I’ll pray for you and the Mrs.

Love and prayers,
Pat
 
Some monks and even a monk that spoke with God speak harsh against smoking. Don’t smoke.
 
Some monks and even a monk that spoke with God speak harsh against smoking. Don’t smoke.
Some monks? Gee.

I smoke a pipe. If it was good enough for Einstein and Santa Claus, it’s good enough for me. 👍

I also enjoy a nice glass of cabernet sauvignon.
18 And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him;
19 Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
20 And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man.
21 For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders,
22 Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness:
23 All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.
  • Mark 7:18-23
 
It’s not that you voluntarily covenant not to partake of certain things, but that you are denied full participation in the church unless you abstain from those things. Sounds like a requirement to me.
The requirement is that we keep our promises. Those people who didn’t make those covenants/promises are not held to them…else why do priests and nuns make a vow of chastity, but you, for instance, don’t have to?
If Jesus himself told me that alcohol and tobacco were not for human use, I would of course think it strange since Jesus drank alcohol every day since he was weened, but I would stop using them immediately. Also, if Jesus told me that meat should not be eaten except in times of cold or famine, you can bet that I would not be barbequeing chicken this labor day.

Why did Joseph keep on using these substances even after he claimed that Jesus himself told him he should not?

Probably the same reason Joseph tried to join the Methodists after Jesus told him not to join any church - because it never really happened and Joseph knew it.

Why do you think it a good think thing to eschew certain foods when Jesus declared all foods clean (Mark 7:17-23)?
Oh, lessee…because smoking gives you lung cancer, too much alcohol can get you in a lot of trouble (and even in moderation can kill you and others if you are stupid enough to drive)? Jesus said that all foods are clean…ritually.

The Law of Moses declared that pork was unclean. Jesus proclaimed that it was clean…but y’know what? Pork STILL carries trichinosis. which can still kill you. There is a difference between being ritually unclean and, y’know…not good for you.

Of course, I can turn this around…if Jesus said that all foods were clean, then would you mind telling me why y’all abstained from meat on Fridays for so long? I mean, really…in that case it really IS the food that you are declaring ‘unclean–’ and ritually so, because it was fine to eat meat every other day of the week.

We simply picked these things and promised not to partake of them. Did you promise not to eat meat on Friday, or is it just…something that you do because it is expected of you? Back before the Vatican said it was OK to eat meat on Fridays, was having a hamburger on Friday something you needed to confess, or say Rosaries for? Was it, in other words, a sin?

You can’t criticize us, Paul, without having some major problems of your own–and for very much the same reasons. I suggest that you think about that.
 
The requirement is that we keep our promises. Those people who didn’t make those covenants/promises are not held to them…else why do priests and nuns make a vow of chastity, but you, for instance, don’t have to?
I think you mean “vow of celibacy” (we are all expected to be chaste). The difference is that the vow of celibacy is truly voluntary. I am not denied full participation in the Catholic Church because I chose to marry instead of taking holy orders. I can choose.

You, however, if you choose not to promise to keep the WoW and have a cup of coffee with your breakfast, will not receive a temple recommend, nor will you get any callings, and you will be shunned by the other members. Nothing voluntary about it.

If you insist that all adherence to the WoW is completely voluntary, here’s an experiment you can perform:

Tomorrow, walk from your car to the chapel with a cup of StarBuck’s coffee in your hand such that all the other members will observe you. See how long you remain a full member of the ward.
 
Did you promise not to eat meat on Friday, or is it just…something that you do because it is expected of you? Back before the Vatican said it was OK to eat meat on Fridays, was having a hamburger on Friday something you needed to confess, or say Rosaries for? Was it, in other words, a sin?
Not at all. We are taught to do (or abstain from) some good thing on Friday as penance for sins and as a memorial of the savior’s passion. We can choose what that penance will be. The church has suggested abstaining from meat (in order to show solidarity with the poor and to discipline our bodies) but it is only one of several choices we can make.
You can’t criticize us, Paul, without having some major problems of your own–and for very much the same reasons. I suggest that you think about that.
I’ve thought about it a great deal. The difference is that Catholics can choose, Mormons cannot. Mormonism is all about controlling the members. Catholicism is about worshipping the Lord in freedom and joy.
 
Not at all. We are taught to do (or abstain from) some good thing on Friday as penance for sins and as a memorial of the savior’s passion. We can choose what that penance will be. The church has suggested abstaining from meat (in order to show solidarity with the poor and to discipline our bodies) but it is only one of several choices we can make.
I agree. The Church says that abstaining from meat on Fridays is one way of doing penance, however, if the Catholic can find another way to do so, they are able to do that. This makes sense since there are Catholics in countries and cultures that rarely eat meat, and therefore abstaining from meat wouldn’t make sense for them. So they do one of the many other ways of doing penance.
I’ve thought about it a great deal. The difference is that Catholics can choose, Mormons cannot. Mormonism is all about controlling the members. Catholicism is about worshipping the Lord in freedom and joy.
I agree. Even those “callings”. The bishop tells everyone what their job is in the ward. The Mormons go on about how their church is special because it’s completely run by the laity and it would fail without the people running the wards and branches and stakes, etc.(ignoring the fact that at least in Catholic parishes, it’s the laity that run Sunday School, sing in the choir or as a cantor, read from the Bible, are altar servers, ushers, tour guides, run various ministries, etc.), but all of what they do is based on a “revelation” from the bishop. Catholics choose to do what they do, Mormons, in those same positions, are volun-told what to do.
 
True. In all my years as a LDS, I never saw any Mormon wash himself with Jack Daniels or dose his cattle with Lucky Strikes. 😃
😃 So I’m guessing they just ignore the part of God’s revelation that says to wash the body in alcohol and put tobacco on bruises? Or maybe they just do it in private and don’t talk about it, just about the coffee, alcohol, etc…:cool:
 
I didn’t know Joe had drunk that night, too.

He was shot while trying to escape from jail. It was the beer’s fault!😃
He and his friends drank from one bottle of wine, which was shared among the four men in the room, two of the guards and the jailer.

Joseph liked an occasional glass of wine…and it was fine, just as it is fine for you to have an occasional glass of wine, because neither one of you promised NOT to drink alcohol.

I, however, have.

Get over it.
 
I think you mean “vow of celibacy” (we are all expected to be chaste).
I sit corrected.
The difference is that the vow of celibacy is truly voluntary.
Really? Can a young novice who breaks that vow take his or her final vows without repenting? Can a priest or nun who breaks that vow continue on in his or her work without repenting?

Oh…and can a man become a priest if he doesn’t take that vow (and yes, I know about married priests who convert from other faiths. I’m talking about young Catholic men and women who are unmarried when they decide they want to enter the religious life.)
I am not denied full participation in the Catholic Church because I chose to marry instead of taking holy orders. I can choose.
Yes, you can. But if you choose to marry or not be celibate, you cannot be a priest. Which, of course, means that do do not have 'full participation," do you?
You, however, if you choose not to promise to keep the WoW and have a cup of coffee with your breakfast, will not receive a temple recommend, nor will you get any callings, and you will be shunned by the other members. Nothing voluntary about it.
You are right about the Temple recommend. Not so right about the rest.

However, it sounds same/same to me; I can’t get a Temple recommend, you can’t be a priest. If we want all of it, we make, and keep the promises.
If you insist that all adherence to the WoW is completely voluntary, here’s an experiment you can perform:

Tomorrow, walk from your car to the chapel with a cup of StarBuck’s coffee in your hand such that all the other members will observe you. See how long you remain a full member of the ward.
Sure. As soon as you perform a similar one. You take your wife to church on Sunday, and tell the priest there that you want to join a religious order; you want to be a priest, too. Oh, and you and your wife get to stay together.

I’ll bet I can heat my coffee in the microwave in the Relief Society kitchen with a whole lot less hoopla than you are going to get with your little announcement.
 
He and his friends drank from one bottle of wine, which was shared among the four men in the room, two of the guards and the jailer.

Joseph liked an occasional glass of wine…and it was fine, just as it is fine for you to have an occasional glass of wine, because neither one of you promised NOT to drink alcohol.

I, however, have.

Get over it.
But you promised because the Mormon church required you to promise as a condition of full membership.

The missionaries would not baptise me unless I promised to obey the WoW.
 
Not at all. We are taught to do (or abstain from) some good thing on Friday as penance for sins and as a memorial of the savior’s passion. We can choose what that penance will be. The church has suggested abstaining from meat (in order to show solidarity with the poor and to discipline our bodies) but it is only one of several choices we can make.

I’ve thought about it a great deal. The difference is that Catholics can choose, Mormons cannot. Mormonism is all about controlling the members. Catholicism is about worshipping the Lord in freedom and joy.
“The church has suggested…”

Fine…the church has suggested. You can choose…but you must choose something, if you are going to truly live your religion. You are expected to keep your wedding vows. You are expected to keep your promises. If you make a vow as part of a religious observance, you are EXPECTED TO KEEP IT.

Now why are the promises you make sacred, but those made by someone else—say, Mormons–not important?

Catholics take vows (and promises made to Saints, which are not quite vows) very seriously indeed. Breaking a vow made to God may well be a mortal sin–and in some cases, definitely is. Promises are important to Catholics.

So are they to us. It doesn’t matter much whether you think our promises are silly (I’ve seen some promises made to Saints that seem incredibly so…) or not necessary, but your approval is not required. WE promised, and our promises are no less serious than are yours…and breaking yours has no less serious a consequence than breaking ours.

Tell me, Paul…if you made a promise to a friend, a promise to a Saint, or a vow to God–and broke it, would it be permissible for you to take communion–that is, enter into the fullness of Catholic life? Or would you have to repent and confess first?
 
But you promised because the Mormon church required you to promise as a condition of full membership.

The missionaries would not baptise me unless I promised to obey the WoW.
So, you did not have to be baptized.

Now; if you don’t keep your promises, can you take communion…without repenting?
 
Yes, you can. But if you choose to marry or not be celibate, you cannot be a priest. Which, of course, means that do do not have 'full participation," do you?

You are right about the Temple recommend. Not so right about the rest.

However, it sounds same/same to me; I can’t get a Temple recommend, you can’t be a priest. If we want all of it, we make, and keep the promises.

Sure. As soon as you perform a similar one. You take your wife to church on Sunday, and tell the priest there that you want to join a religious order; you want to be a priest, too. Oh, and you and your wife get to stay together.

I’ll bet I can heat my coffee in the microwave in the Relief Society kitchen with a whole lot less hoopla than you are going to get with your little announcement.
If Paul wants to, he can go become an Eastern Catholic priest. They are allowed to be married. Same Catholic Church, different external expressions (liturgics). Some are bi-ritual as well (celebrating both Western and Eastern liturgies). And of course he can always become a deacon.

I think you know exactly what Paul was saying though. In Catholicism, being a priest doesn’t affect your salvation. You aren’t any more or less saved than the homeless Catholic guy sleeping on the cathedral steps. “Full participation” in the Catholic Church has nothing to do with being a priest. “Full participation” has to do with the sacraments. The priesthood is a sacrament, but it is not a saving sacrament. In contrast, if you “choose” to drink coffee and alcohol, and you go off to your temple recommend interview, and the bishop asks you if you’ve been keeping the word of wisdom, and you say no, you won’t be going to the temple to be endowed or to be sealed eternally. Therefore, no exaltation for you, at least until hopefully someone decides to be a proxy for you. As we can see, the priesthood is not an equivalent. You don’t need to hold the priesthood to be saved (since we only have one degree of “saving” in Catholicism). In contrast, if you aren’t living the Word of Wisdom, you can’t receive the ordinances needed to be exalted in Mormonism, at least in this life. AKA, you can’t participate fully in Mormonism.
 
this is the first time I’m hearing about vows/promises to the Heavenly saints…:confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top