T
TMC
Guest
I agree with you to a point. I think that there is a stong attempt to change the attitude that “Homosexual-sex-acts are wrong, and therefore people who participate in them should be treated differently than others.”It’s an interesting thing. The “secular” society is presently being heavily influenced to regard my saying, “Homosexual-sex-acts are wrong” as being “rude” and “unloving”.
I don’t agree with this statement. Labeling someone rude does not necessarily lead to violence, and usually does not.When someone does something “rude” and “unloving” he is subsequently “persecuted” by ostracism and eventual violence.
I agree if by rudeness you mean different treatment, I would agree. If you mean unkind statements or attitudes I would disgree.What the “practicing homosexual” wants is for the “rude” to be punished (lightly preferably but more forcefully if necessary) so that rudeness is less likely to happen.
That is indeed the goal of the “practicing homosexual”, as you would probably agree.
I still don’t know why you say this. Has any other ‘attitude’ been codified into law in this way? How would such a law survive constitutional challenge? This is just not going to happen, its a boogy man.Eventually this “attitude” will be codified into law, and the “imminence” of laws to that effect is not the issue.
I am not a fan of hate crime laws, either. Assault is assault, murder is murder, I don’t think we need hate crimes laws. At the same time I don’t think they have far reaching effects. I do think that Title VII and the anti-discrimination laws have had a very positive effect on our society and I would support expanding them. What good argument is there against that?Hate-crime laws are utterly unnecessary, as they are simply “political condescensions” given to “special groups” in exchange for votes.
No, it is not. And I don’t think any serious person, gay or straight, thinks it should be.The amazing fact that such a perverse trivial minority can affect such a massive change in society is absolutely amazing, and is GREAT motivation for normal people to do the Christian thing, in the Christian way, that would put the perverse back in it’s place.
The previous sentence would probably be regarded by the “practicing homosexual” as an actual “fightin’ words” attack on them worthy of actual legal punishment.
I just don’t see the great harm and list of calamaties coming to pass if laws ensuring the rights of gay people are passed. It hasn’t happened when any of the other civil rights laws were passed. Criticizing black people is still not a crime. Hating Jews is still legal. No one gets sued for saying women should stay at home and keep out of men’s business. These laws would be no different.