A
aperture
Guest
Racism and sexism are blatantly discriminatory actions that very clearly hurt people. Contraception is not so black and white. To say that people are conflicted over sexual freedom because they’re libertine cowards is a pretty sad straw man.I would suggest reading the article “The Incon Inconvenient Conscience” by George Cardinal Pell published in First Things, May 2005.
Why do people strain to accommodate absolute sexual freedom as a matter of conscience? Why does no one plead for the right to racism or sexism as a matter of conscience? Could it be because the liberal concept of conscience has been specially formulated in order to facilitate the sexual indiscipline that our culture upholds?
People are more likely to fear guilt in dissent because - well, misery loves company. Many times it is much easier to be wrong with many people than right alone.Much of the debate over conscience in Catholic circles focuses on the possibility of a conscience set against the Church’s teaching. This seems to me a peculiar notion. For a start, it seems to mean that dissenters believe that following the Church on, say, contraception or same-sex relationships, would actually give them a guilty conscience. Yet it seems clear that most dissenters do not fear guilt if they obey the Church. What they fear is precisely the frustration of their unsatisfied desires.