Consecrated Hands

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Heart
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholic_Heart

Guest
**I have never really considered this question until now…

It is my understanding that a priest’s hands are consecrated…So that he may hold and administer the Eucharist…So…Why, then, are we…as lay people with unconsecrated hands…allowed to recieve communion in our hands and to be Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion.

This question has come to my mind at a time when I have become a part of a ministry to the elderly…Our parish serves five nursing homes. We do Communion Services, and distribute Holy Communion to those who attend, and to those who cannot. Should I continue with this ministry?

I realize that without EMHC’s many people would not be able to recive Jesus in the Eucharist…But…There is the question of consecrated and unconsecrated hands.

I’m not tryng to start a debate…Just want some answers to a question that is haunting me.

Thanks…
**
 
Catholic Heart said:
**I have never really considered this question until now…

It is my understanding that a priest’s hands are consecrated…So that he may hold and administer the Eucharist…So…Why, then, are we…as lay people with unconsecrated hands…allowed to recieve communion in our hands and to be Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion.

This question has come to my mind at a time when I have become a part of a ministry to the elderly…Our parish serves five nursing homes. We do Communion Services, and distribute Holy Communion to those who attend, and to those who cannot. Should I continue with this ministry?

I realize that without EMHC’s many people would not be able to recive Jesus in the Eucharist…But…There is the question of consecrated and unconsecrated hands.

I’m not tryng to start a debate…Just want some answers to a question that is haunting me.

Thanks…
**

I’m curious to see what other posters say.
I’ve never heard of consecrated hands and don’t think that is correct.
EMHC’s are allowed to distribute the Host and the faithful are allowed to receive it in their hands.
 
yes the priest’s hands are consecrated to bless the Eucharist. Yes it used to be the discipline that the faithful did not receive the Eucharist in their hands, a change from what was the practice in the early Church according to some of the Fathers. yes the discipline changed as part of the changes of Vatican II, in the US at least, where permission was given for a time for this option. It was never decreed that receiving in the hand is preferred, but it was permitted. Why I can’t say but if the church permits it, it is licit.
 
40.png
thistle:
I’m curious to see what other posters say.
I’ve never heard of consecrated hands and don’t think that is correct.
EMHC’s are allowed to distribute the Host and the faithful are allowed to receive it in their hands.
Me neither…
 
40.png
puzzleannie:
yes the priest’s hands are consecrated to bless the Eucharist. Yes it used to be the discipline that the faithful did not receive the Eucharist in their hands, a change from what was the practice in the early Church according to some of the Fathers. yes the discipline changed as part of the changes of Vatican II, in the US at least, where permission was given for a time for this option. It was never decreed that receiving in the hand is preferred, but it was permitted. Why I can’t say but if the church permits it, it is licit.
Are the priests hands considered permanently consecrated and how would this have been done. I assume a priests hands would have to be consecrated by another priest.
 
40.png
thistle:
Are the priests hands considered permanently consecrated and how would this have been done. I assume a priests hands would have to be consecrated by another priest.
Yes…The consecration is permanent, and it is done by the bishop, at the time of ordination.
 
The hands of the priest are not consecrated to hold the Eucharist but rather his hands are consecrated (set apart) for the offering of Sacrifice. To consecrate something means to set it aside in a special way for the service of God. In this case it is for the administering of the Sacraments and confecting of the Eucharist. Being able to hold the Eucharist is not part of the reason for the consecration of his hands. Remember, a Deacon is an Ordinary Minister of Holy Communion just like a Bishop or a Priest but the Deacons hands are not consecrated.
 
The Truth About
Communion in the Hand

“Out of Reverence for this Sacrament,
nothing Touches It but what is Consecrated” - Saint Thomas Aquinas

by John Vennari

“Our Fathers Have Told Us!”
Code:
          Throughout the centuries, our fathers have told us about our Faith and about the Blessed Sacrament. Our fathers have told us that the Holy Eucharist is truly the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ. The Fathers of the Council of Trent defined the Blessed Sacrament with precision and care. Father Thomas Aquinas taught us that out of reverence toward this Sacrament, the touching and administrating of this Sacrament belong only to the priest. Our Catholic fathers at home, as well as our teaching sisters in school, told us that it was sacrilegious for anyone but the priest to touch the sacred host.

          Throughout the centuries, the Popes, bishops and priests taught us this same thing, not so much by words, but by example — and especially by the celebration of the Old Latin Mass, where profound reverence for the Blessed Sacrament as the true Body of Christ was in every move the priest made. Our fathers told us these things not just for the sake of handing down a venerable but groundless tradition, they have told us these things through word and ex-ample to show fidelity to the Catholic Faith and reverence toward the Blessed Sacrament. Our fathers told us this because it was the truth.

          But the introduction of Communion in the hand and lay ministers of the Eucharist shows an arrogant disregard for what our fathers taught us. And though these practices have been introduced under the guise of being an “authentic” liturgical development mandated by Vatican II, the truth is Communion in the hand is not an authentic liturgical development, was not mandated by the Second Vatican Council, and shows complete defiance and contempt for centuries of Catholic teaching and practice before us, thus resembling the philosophy of the New Paganism and the philosophy of revolution.
Nowhere Mentioned in Vatican II
Code:
          Communion in the hand is not mentioned in a single document of the Second Vatican Council, nor was it mentioned during any of the debates during the Council. In all sixteen documents of Vatican II, there is no mention of Communion in the hand.

          The teaching of Saint Thomas Aquinas, in his great Summa Theologica bears this out. He explains:

          “The dispensing of Christ's Body belongs to the priest for three reasons.

          “First, because he consecrates in the person of Christ. But as Christ consecrated His Body at the (Last) Supper, so also He gave It to others to be partaken of bythem. Accordingly, as the consecration of Christ?s Body belongs to the priest, so likewise does the dispensing belong to him.

          “Second, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer the people?s gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated gifts to the people.

          “Third, because out of reverence for this Sacrament, nothing touches It but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands for touching this Sacrament. Hence, it is not lawful for anyone else to touch It, except from necessity, for instance, if It were to fall upon the ground or else in some other case of urgency.” (ST, III, Q.82, Art. 13)

          Saint Thomas, who is the prince of theologians in the Catholic Church, who towers above all the rest, whose Summa Theologica was placed on the altar next to the Scriptures during the Council of Trent, and whose teaching Saint Pius X said was the remedy for Modernism ... Saint Thomas clearly teaches that it belongs to the priest and only to the priest to touch and administer the Sacred Host, that “only that which is consecrated” (the hands of the priest) “should touch the Consecrated” (the Sacred Host).
Bibliography

Communion in the Hand and Similar Frauds - Michael Davies
Documents of Vatican II - Abbot Edition
Dominicae Cenae - Pope John Paul II - 2/24/80
The Great Heresies - Hilaire Belloc
Immensae Caritatis - Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship - 1/29/73
The Last Roman Catholic? - James W. Demers
Memoriale Domini - Pope Paul VI - 5/29/69
Pope John?s Council - Michael Davies
Preaching and Teaching about the Eucharist - Msgr. Joseph M. Champlin
Privilege of the Ordained - Michael Davies
The Rhine Flows into the Tiber - Ralph Wiltgen
Summa Theologica - Saint Thomas Aquinas
 
40.png
John-the-Seeker:
The Truth About
Communion in the Hand

“Out of Reverence for this Sacrament,
nothing Touches It but what is Consecrated” - Saint Thomas Aquinas

by John Vennari

“Our Fathers Have Told Us!”
Code:
          Throughout the centuries, our fathers have told us about our Faith and about the Blessed Sacrament. Our fathers have told us that the Holy Eucharist is truly the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus Christ. The Fathers of the Council of Trent defined the Blessed Sacrament with precision and care. Father Thomas Aquinas taught us that out of reverence toward this Sacrament, the touching and administrating of this Sacrament belong only to the priest. Our Catholic fathers at home, as well as our teaching sisters in school, told us that it was sacrilegious for anyone but the priest to touch the sacred host.

          Throughout the centuries, the Popes, bishops and priests taught us this same thing, not so much by words, but by example — and especially by the celebration of the Old Latin Mass, where profound reverence for the Blessed Sacrament as the true Body of Christ was in every move the priest made. Our fathers told us these things not just for the sake of handing down a venerable but groundless tradition, they have told us these things through word and ex-ample to show fidelity to the Catholic Faith and reverence toward the Blessed Sacrament. Our fathers told us this because it was the truth.

          But the introduction of Communion in the hand and lay ministers of the Eucharist shows an arrogant disregard for what our fathers taught us. And though these practices have been introduced under the guise of being an “authentic” liturgical development mandated by Vatican II, the truth is Communion in the hand is not an authentic liturgical development, was not mandated by the Second Vatican Council, and shows complete defiance and contempt for centuries of Catholic teaching and practice before us, thus resembling the philosophy of the New Paganism and the philosophy of revolution.
Nowhere Mentioned in Vatican II
Code:
          Communion in the hand is not mentioned in a single document of the Second Vatican Council, nor was it mentioned during any of the debates during the Council. In all sixteen documents of Vatican II, there is no mention of Communion in the hand.

          The teaching of Saint Thomas Aquinas, in his great Summa Theologica bears this out. He explains:

          “The dispensing of Christ's Body belongs to the priest for three reasons.

          “First, because he consecrates in the person of Christ. But as Christ consecrated His Body at the (Last) Supper, so also He gave It to others to be partaken of bythem. Accordingly, as the consecration of Christ?s Body belongs to the priest, so likewise does the dispensing belong to him.

          “Second, because the priest is the appointed intermediary between God and the people, hence as it belongs to him to offer the people?s gifts to God, so it belongs to him to deliver the consecrated gifts to the people.

          “Third, because out of reverence for this Sacrament, nothing touches It but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands for touching this Sacrament. Hence, it is not lawful for anyone else to touch It, except from necessity, for instance, if It were to fall upon the ground or else in some other case of urgency.” (ST, III, Q.82, Art. 13)

          Saint Thomas, who is the prince of theologians in the Catholic Church, who towers above all the rest, whose Summa Theologica was placed on the altar next to the Scriptures during the Council of Trent, and whose teaching Saint Pius X said was the remedy for Modernism ... Saint Thomas clearly teaches that it belongs to the priest and only to the priest to touch and administer the Sacred Host, that “only that which is consecrated” (the hands of the priest) “should touch the Consecrated” (the Sacred Host).
Bibliography

Communion in the Hand and Similar Frauds - Michael Davies
Documents of Vatican II - Abbot Edition
Dominicae Cenae - Pope John Paul II - 2/24/80
The Great Heresies - Hilaire Belloc
Immensae Caritatis - Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship - 1/29/73
The Last Roman Catholic? - James W. Demers
Memoriale Domini - Pope Paul VI - 5/29/69
Pope John?s Council - Michael Davies
Preaching and Teaching about the Eucharist - Msgr. Joseph M. Champlin
Privilege of the Ordained - Michael Davies
The Rhine Flows into the Tiber - Ralph Wiltgen
Summa Theologica - Saint Thomas Aquinas
See my above post this is one of the very few cases where Thomas is incorrect.
 
Controversy surrounds the claim that Communion in the hand was practiced in the early Church. There are some that claim that it was practiced up until the sixth century and even cite a passage of St. Cyril to substantiate this assertion. Others maintain that it was never a Catholic custom, but if Communion in the hand was practiced in the early Church, if was instituted by the Arians as a sign of their disbelief in the Divinity of Jesus Christ. This same school of thought also maintains that the quotation of Saint Cyril is of unsound Arian apocryphal origins. Whatever the case, it is clear that Communion on the tongue is of Apostolic origins (that is, taught by Christ Himself), Communion in the hand was condemned as an abuse at the Synod of Rouen in 650, and the practice of Communion in the Hand is never reflected in the artwork of any period whether it be in the East or West… that is, up until after the Second Vatican Council.
 
My last two posts here were excerpted from
**The Truth About
Communion in the Hand

“Out of Reverence for this Sacrament,
nothing Touches It but what is Consecrated” - Saint Thomas Aquinas

by John Vennari**The full article while dealing quite well with many concerns regarding Communion in the hand is too long for posting here.
 
40.png
John-the-Seeker:
Controversy surrounds the claim that Communion in the hand was practiced in the early Church. There are some that claim that it was practiced up until the sixth century and even cite a passage of St. Cyril to substantiate this assertion. Others maintain that it was never a Catholic custom, but if Communion in the hand was practiced in the early Church, if was instituted by the Arians as a sign of their disbelief in the Divinity of Jesus Christ. This same school of thought also maintains that the quotation of Saint Cyril is of unsound Arian apocryphal origins. Whatever the case, it is clear that Communion on the tongue is of Apostolic origins (that is, taught by Christ Himself), Communion in the hand was condemned as an abuse at the Synod of Rouen in 650, and the practice of Communion in the Hand is never reflected in the artwork of any period whether it be in the East or West… that is, up until after the Second Vatican Council.
You are mostly correct but it is also an argument from silence to say that it was of Arian institution. Rather, it is important to note that as I stated above that the Deacon is an Ordinary Minister of Holy Communion but does not have his hands consecrated. Now, I am all for saying that it is more fitting for a person who has received Holy Orders to distribute Holy Communion but even in the Tridentine Rubrics there is allowance for the Sub-Deacon or even an Instituted Acolyte to distribute Holy Communion and neither for those are Holy Orders but only Minor Orders. We must keep the whole question in perspective.
 
**General Notice:

Regarding quoted texts/materials/references to the threads:

Please review Forum rules and the help sticky,
Helpful Hints on Posting:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=72808**
Guidelines on posting articles to Catholic Answer Forums

As this notice has been posted for several months now, regretfully, posts will have to be deleted from threads in the future.

Than you for your understanding and cooperation.
 
My tongue hasn’t been consecrated yet. How am I supposed to receive communion at all?
40.png
mosher:
Remember, a Deacon is an Ordinary Minister of Holy Communion just like a Bishop or a Priest but the Deacons hands are not consecrated.
Excellent point mosher.
 
40.png
thistle:
I’m curious to see what other posters say.
I’ve never heard of consecrated hands and don’t think that is correct.
EMHC’s are allowed to distribute the Host and the faithful are allowed to receive it in their hands.
You really never knew that the priests hands were consecrated? Come on, you’ve got to be joking. When you went through Catechism, or CCD or RCIA or whatever, you read about and discussed the Sacrament of Holy Orders didn’t you? It’s right there. .
 
even in the Tridentine Rubrics there is allowance for the Sub-Deacon or even an Instituted Acolyte to distribute Holy Communion and neither for those are Holy Orders but only Minor Orders. We must keep the whole question in perspective.

An excellent point…
 
40.png
palmas85:
You really never knew that the priests hands were consecrated? Come on, you’ve got to be joking. When you went through Catechism, or CCD or RCIA or whatever, you read about and discussed the Sacrament of Holy Orders didn’t you? It’s right there. .
Well excuse me for not being perfect like you!!!
No I don’t recollect learning specifically about that in RCIA.
Why do you have to be so rude to someone asking an honest question?
 
40.png
thistle:
Well excuse me for not being perfect like you!!!
No I don’t recollect learning specifically about that in RCIA.
Why do you have to be so rude to someone asking an honest question?
I thought maybe palmas was kidding. My best friend went through RCIA and we were amazed at how much was left out, even very basic things like how to go to confession. I would be very surprised if your RCIA mentioned a priest’s consecrated hands, which don’t have the significance they did 30 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top