You’ve misinterpreted me. Dulia et al. are our attitudes, nothing to do with who we pray to; we are agreed. The saints act only through the power of God; we are agreed. St Michael can destroy a demon because he has been created by God with this power and for this purpose, along with the purpose to praise him; we are agreed.
The only place I disagree categorically is that a departed Saint in the Church Triumphant can help us in any way other than prayer on our behalf: as was quoted earlier, Jas 5:16 I believe, “the prayer of the righteous is powerful” (I paraphrased this in my original post), and there are none more righteous and pure than the Church Triumphant. A saint “answering” our prayer is actually God’s answer to that saint’s prayer on our behalf, as I stated. (With St Michael, this gets in to not prayer or worship, but angelology [being that angels and men were created differently, with different innate capacities, and for different mediate purposes, even if the teleological/final cause of each is to adore God], which isn’t my specialty, so I’d have to dig out
The Celestial Hierarchy by Dionysius the Areopagite and the relevant parts of the
Summa Theologiae of the great Saint Aquinas.)
We may just express it differently. I attempt to express what I say in terms of theological precision (it is my training), even if my writing can be Byzantine and confusing. (I have a very Thomist-monergistic “crypto-Calvinist”, phaw] view of grace, and, it seems, by extension, this, as well.) You seem to speak from the practice of piety. As the Orthodox say, “He who prays truly is a true theologian, and a true theologian is he who prays truly”. Needless to say, the Orthodox Church gave me the boot for my bad theology

*
*More for my categorical rejection of the essence-energies distinction (and the acceptance of Papal primacy, purgatory, and Thomism. It took me a while to work out the
filioque, though.).