finally , we have something to agree with
yes , i alse believe that in islam we can’t separate the teaching of islam from the state , actually we have to establish islam in our state to bring the peace to the world
did you ever read these verses from quran before
“Fight in the cause of God those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors. (The Noble Quran, 2:190)”
Fighting in the cause of GOD Almighty those who fight us is what “Jihad” is all about. I can’t go and kill a non-Muslim just because he is a non-Muslim. That is absolutely forbidden in Islam:
“But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in God: for He is One that heareth and knoweth (all things). (The Noble Quran, 8:61)”
And surah 2 was abrogated. Not only its application but its authority. Along with surah 2 there are 23 other surahs that fall into the classification, and they are: 3, 5, 8, 9, 14, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 33, 34, 40, 42, 51, 52, 56, 58, 73, 103, and 108
And if a treaty of peace was made, then we must honor that treaty to the end:
“Except those who join a group between whom and you there is a treaty (of peace), or those who approach you with hearts restraining them from fighting you as well as fighting their own people. If God had pleased, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you: Therefore if they withdraw from you but fight you not, and (instead) send you (Guarantees of) peace, then God Hath opened no way for you (to war against them). (The Noble Quran, 4:90)”
Ironic that up to this date no peace treaty, or cease fire agreement, has been honored - now you expect me to believe this?! Anyway, what that ‘treaty of peace’ is - it is only if the people accept subjugation. Your translation is a bit skewed, but that is not surprising since it is the duty of Muslims to intentionally try to mislead us as to what the koran says.
this surah is Muhammed’s abdication at Hudaybiyah. Muhammed says that Allah said the treaty was a strategy designed to deceive the enemy - to lull them into a false sense of peace. Because if one studies Islamic history we will find that Muhammed never kept any of his peace treaties.
“How can there be a league, before God and His Apostle, with the Pagans, except those with whom ye made a treaty near the sacred Mosque? As long as these stand true to you, stand ye true to them: for God doth love the righteous. (The Noble Quran, 9:7)”
“And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for God. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers. (The Noble Quran 2:193)”
note , quran said " and religion is for God " it dosn’t say " and the religion will be islam"
the verse is talking about the freedom of religion
Another attempt to mislead. Considering that there is no freedom of religion in any Muslim state to this day. Muslims don’t recognize any other religion except Islam and only tolerate ‘people of the book’ if they accept subjugation. And even then the toleration is unstable. Sharia laws only protect them minimally and they have no rights to other freedoms. their religious rights are a minimum - no building/repairing Churches, no showing their religious symbols, no sound of prayer from them is tolerated, and so on.
Considering the constant (self) claims of them being Abrahamic, there is no tolerance for the other two religions included in that description. In fact, the hatred for Christians is only outdone by the hatred for Jews in the Koran.
The behavior of Muslims under Sharia laws and this attempt to try to tell us that Islam is tolerant, peaceful, etc just doesn’t add up.
I used to say that Muslims should go tell their own to stop their violence and intolerance if we are to believe that the violent and intolerant ones are misunderstanding Islam. Now that I know their texts and even know their Sharia laws, the deception is coming from the Muslims that are telling us that Islam is tolerant and peaceful. It is not and their history and texts, and especially their Prophet, show us that it is not.
