Contemporary Doesn't Have to Be Bad

  • Thread starter Thread starter JKirkLVNV
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It looks like they’re walking the tall statue. Or maybe it’s a fixture; what do I know about this contemporary art?
Actually, the topic for the thread isn’t what GOES ON in churches. There are many churches in the West that “traditionalists” go all shrill and goosebumpy over in terms of the architecture and the appointments that have also been the scene of liturgical abuses. Those abuses (and I’m not sure that this qualifies as one, though I don’t care for it: there are the antedents in Latin countries of the great statues carried out of the churches and into the streets in procession for feast days, Holy Week, etc.) don’t detract from the beauty of the buildings, generally.

Let’s stick to the buildings and the permanent features therein (in your charity). I freely acknowledge that there are some contemporary horrors, such as the cathedrals in San Francisco (which looks like a Whirlpool agitator) or Oakland. I think this link shows one, however, that works nicely. Though contemporary, it draws on tradition: sacredhearthouston.org/index.cfm?load=photoalbum&album=5

To At Trent, per our discussion of “the people’s altar”: You will note the altar. This is an a very good example of what I would consider to be an ideal Altar: Fairly severe, massive, made of stone.
 
Here is a pictue of a design submitted to the Diocese of Oakland for their new cathedral (and unfortunately, it wasn’t selected). It is what I would regard as a perfect example of a “contemprary” child of tradition, as it were: new, but drawing on its own ancestry.

beatusest.blogspot.com/
 
It looks like they’re walking the tall statue. Or maybe it’s a fixture; what do I know about this contemporary art?
Noooo! It’s one of those giant puppets. :bigyikes: Why does this nonsense keep plaguing our churches?!?!
Because it’s tolerated.
If you noticed the name of the Church, it was St. James Cathedral.
I do believe that the “giant puppet” is actually St. James, and it is something that is used in Spain as part of the feast day celebrations. I had a friend who made the pilgrimage, and in her pictures I saw the same thing.

Just because it is something that we are not used to does not mean that it is “bad”.
If anything, this seems to be part of the cultural celebrations of the saint for whom this Chruch was named.

And BTW- I think that the chruch itself is beautiful!! 🙂
 
If you noticed the name of the Church, it was St. James Cathedral.
I do believe that the “giant puppet” is actually St. James, and it is something that is used in Spain as part of the feast day celebrations. I had a friend who made the pilgrimage, and in her pictures I saw the same thing.

Just because it is something that we are not used to does not mean that it is “bad”.
If anything, this seems to be part of the cultural celebrations of the saint for whom this Chruch was named.

And BTW- I think that the chruch itself is beautiful!! 🙂
It is a beautiful cathedral. stephenbrashear.com/2011/archdiocese-of-seattle-priest-ordination/
 
Wow…the stained glass windows in the cathedral are really beautiful, as are the detailed arches. And it looks pipe organ tubes (not sure what they are supposed to be called) are there behind the Archbishop and priests.

Does anyone know if any photos are available of what the main altar looked like before it was moved to a more central location in the sanctuary? I can imagine that it was quite lovely, too.
 
Wow…the stained glass windows in the cathedral are really beautiful, as are the detailed arches. And it looks pipe organ tubes (not sure what they are supposed to be called) are there behind the Archbishop and priests.

Does anyone know if any photos are available of what the main altar looked like before it was moved to a more central location in the sanctuary? I can imagine that it was quite lovely, too.
uquebec.ca/musique/orgues/etatsunis/seattlesjc1.html
This link contains a before photo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top