Contraception question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anne_G
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Noma,

I am deeply saddened that you have come to the conclusion that you did. I enjoyed our discussion and I also appreciate your honest and kind earnestness in the points you made.

I also appreciate your humility.

I too am a convert from atheism. A little more than three years ago, I had a supernatural experience which pretty much instantly (well took both two weeks and at the same just one very short evening) changed from a lifetime of ardent atheism to a certainty of God and that the Catholic Church is His true Church. Over time, I evolved into a conservative, traditional leaning, Catholic. I posted a brief description of my conversion on this thread. forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=122474

Like you, I had zero support from my atheist (now ex-) wife. She even divorced me because, as she told the court, I refused to stop going to Mass. (Even worse, I actually voted for a Republican! :eek: )

For me, the most difficult thing to get rid of was an aspect I did not even realize I possessed; a self assurance so supreme that it bordered on arrogance. This made it very difficult for me to “bend” myself to accept the teachings of the Church. It required me to submit obediantly to things to I did not at first understand. However, because of my experience, I knew the Church to be true. After this suppression of my will, I came to learn and understand those teachings. It required me to learn a new way of thinking, which is difficult for a middle-aged man set in his ways.

For me the two big issues when I came into the church were abortion and the Immaculate Conception of Mary. It took much study, and a very humble re-examination for me to understand the Church’s reasoning. However, with the realization that Faith and Reason are not in conflict within Catholic Theology, I knew I could find the answer.

For me, the answer came by means of voracious reading. Modern teachers like Scott Hahn at first. Then I went to the Doctors of the Church, particularly St. Augustine, (City of God, Confessions) and St. Thomas Aquinas (Suma Theologica, Suma Contra Gentiles).

It was, however, the combination of two things that helped me to understand and accept the Church without exception. The first was a private retreat I made at a Franciscan retreat house. For 4 days, I sat with a Franciscan Sister, who also had to divide her time with taking care of retired sisters as this was also a retirement house and infirmary for Franciscan sisters. She has since become my spiritual director. Her guidance has been invaluable.

The second major influence was St. Francis de Sales book, Introduction to the Devout Life. This has helped me greatly, though I most definitely have a long way to go.

The Church today has many problems. It is not the happy, joyful band we would all hope it to be. But then, this has always been the case. Look at the Old Testament, there have always been more devout and less devout, and downright wicked people who all claimed to love God. Often a single person would go through all these stages, Look at King Saul and King David. In the New Testament, in the Book of Acts we see division grew among the Apostles and a meeting was held (later called the first Church Council). In many of the letters of the Apostle Paul, he admonished many people because they fell away or were following incorrect teaching.

A writer (G.K. Chesterton?) once wrote the effect that we should not judge the Catholic Church by its members, but what the Church desires its members to aspire to. I ask that you consider this advice.

God bless you and you will be in my prayers.
 
To all:

After talking about a certain problem with my pastor, with friends, with you here, with family even, I have come to a conclusion.

There are aspects of the ordinary magisterium that I disagree with. By Point One, and given the fact that my wife’s family, and my own, are protestant, I have decided, being unwilling to change my mind about certain teachings of the Catholic Church that I consider ridiculous and indefensible, of which this is one, that I am leaving the Roman Catholic Church.

I plan on retaining membership (I’m not going to formally excommunicate myself just yet) until Easter. If these issues are not resolved by then, I will join an Anglican community nearby, and submit a letter to my diocese declaring my dissension, and my reasons for leaving the Church.

I cannot bend, and will not bend, to a group of articles on the “faith”. I have a feeling that, if things were better explained to me in my own RCIA class, and if I had not been so stubborn, so excited, and so deaf to what they were trying to teach me, I may not have found myself in this painful situation.

Though I would like to, I no longer believe that the Roman Church is the Catholic Church, except in name.

Last Point

Conversations and about a year of soul-searching have gone into this. Many people have been involved in making this decision.

Though you helped show me that my beliefs were contrary to the claimed-“infallible” teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, you did not help me leave it. This I do of my own free will.

Your charity in the matter has been astounding. I thank you for this multi-forum interaction.

God’s blessings.

Paul
This is a most serious decision. We appreciate you collectively letting us off the hook of having driven you out of the Church. 😉

I am reminded of the gospel story of the young rich man’s encounter with Jesus, and how he too walked away sad, unable to accept the demands of discipleship to enter into the fullness of relationship that Jesus desired for him. I am sure that Jesus was equally disappointed. Part of me is betting that in the remainder of his life, that this sincere young man was finally won over to the grace of conversion to the fullness of faith in Jesus Christ; which after the resurrection, Jesus solely identified himself with the apostolic Church that he founded.

I believe that you would do yourself a favor to read some of the testimonies of former Protestant converts to the Catholic faith who had a most difficult time and need for grace to overcome their objections to the prohibition against ABC and the role of Mary in the life of the faithful.

I am always curious if the rich young man was the same “rich man from Arimathe’a, named Joseph, who also was a disciple of Jesus” mentioned later in the gospel.

“When the young man heard this he went away sorrowful; for he had great possessions.” Matthew 19: 22

“When it was evening, there came a rich man from Arimathe’a, named Joseph, who also was a disciple of Jesus.” Matthew 27: 57
 
To all:

After talking about a certain problem with my pastor, with friends, with you here, with family even, I have come to a conclusion.

First Point

And this is probably the most important for the sake of this forum.

I was wrong.

After reading some of the resources given by you here, I have come to the conclusion that I was absolutely and completely wrong about the teachings of the Roman Church.

The teaching on contraception, I can only conclude, is claimed to be infallible by the Roman Church, and that denying this is denying the Roman Church.

Thank you for your conviction. There are also other people I certainly thank in helping me discover this.

And I will say that any good Catholic anywhere must accept this teaching, if he wishes to call himself Roman Catholic. Period.

Second Point

Concerning a different post, I have decided to resign from RCIA (after expressing to them my reasons). I find that I do not have the appropriate beliefs to teach in RCIA classes. I have also decided to stop taking the Catholic Eucharist. Thank you for helping me realize how my beliefs are different from the beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church.

Third Point

I was a recent convert. I came into the Church from atheism two years ago on easter, with the belief that the Roman Catholic Church was the only Christian Church. I was guided in after taking a class about the Summa Theologica taught by a Greek Orthodox professor. I then converted at a Byzantine Catholic Church. I studied and enjoyed the teachings promulgated there, and the beautiful liturgies of the Byzantine Catholics. I cannot think of anything else on earth that matches its splendor.

Fourth Point

There are aspects of the ordinary magisterium that I disagree with. By Point One, and given the fact that my wife’s family, and my own, are protestant, I have decided, being unwilling to change my mind about certain teachings of the Catholic Church that I consider ridiculous and indefensible, of which this is one, that I am leaving the Roman Catholic Church.

I plan on retaining membership (I’m not going to formally excommunicate myself just yet) until Easter. If these issues are not resolved by then, I will join an Anglican community nearby, and submit a letter to my diocese declaring my dissension, and my reasons for leaving the Church.

Until then, save for speaking with my spiritual adviser and going to confessions, I am not going to attend the Church as regularly as I have been (once a day), but probably will alternate Sundays between the Anglican and Roman Catholic churches.

I cannot bend, and will not bend, to a group of articles on the “faith”. I have a feeling that, if things were better explained to me in my own RCIA class, and if I had not been so stubborn, so excited, and so deaf to what they were trying to teach me, I may not have found myself in this painful situation.

Though I would like to, I no longer believe that the Roman Church is the Catholic Church, except in name.

Last Point

Conversations and about a year of soul-searching have gone into this. Many people have been involved in making this decision.

Though you helped show me that my beliefs were contrary to the claimed-“infallible” teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, you did not help me leave it. This I do of my own free will.

Your charity in the matter has been astounding. I thank you for this multi-forum interaction.

God’s blessings.

Paul
 
Hi Guy’s

I hope everyone takes time to realize in this thread as many others of same subject the only argument left at the end is “The church says NFP is okay, and the church says the church is the authority for such decisions”
 
Hi Guy’s

I hope everyone takes time to realize in this thread as many others of same subject the only argument left at the end is “The church says NFP is okay, and the church says the church is the authority for such decisions”
Who gave the Church the authority to “whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven”?

“I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” ." Matthew 16: 19

“Truly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Matthew 18: 18
 
To all:

After talking about a certain problem with my pastor, with friends, with you here, with family even, I have come to a conclusion.

First Point

And this is probably the most important for the sake of this forum.

I was wrong.

After reading some of the resources given by you here, I have come to the conclusion that I was absolutely and completely wrong about the teachings of the Roman Church.

The teaching on contraception, I can only conclude, is claimed to be infallible by the Roman Church, and that denying this is denying the Roman Church.

Thank you for your conviction. There are also other people I certainly thank in helping me discover this.

And I will say that any good Catholic anywhere must accept this teaching, if he wishes to call himself Roman Catholic. Period.

Second Point

Concerning a different post, I have decided to resign from RCIA (after expressing to them my reasons). I find that I do not have the appropriate beliefs to teach in RCIA classes. I have also decided to stop taking the Catholic Eucharist. Thank you for helping me realize how my beliefs are different from the beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church.

Third Point

I was a recent convert. I came into the Church from atheism two years ago on easter, with the belief that the Roman Catholic Church was the only Christian Church. I was guided in after taking a class about the Summa Theologica taught by a Greek Orthodox professor. I then converted at a Byzantine Catholic Church. I studied and enjoyed the teachings promulgated there, and the beautiful liturgies of the Byzantine Catholics. I cannot think of anything else on earth that matches its splendor.

Fourth Point

There are aspects of the ordinary magisterium that I disagree with. By Point One, and given the fact that my wife’s family, and my own, are protestant, I have decided, being unwilling to change my mind about certain teachings of the Catholic Church that I consider ridiculous and indefensible, of which this is one, that I am leaving the Roman Catholic Church.

I plan on retaining membership (I’m not going to formally excommunicate myself just yet) until Easter. If these issues are not resolved by then, I will join an Anglican community nearby, and submit a letter to my diocese declaring my dissension, and my reasons for leaving the Church.

Until then, save for speaking with my spiritual adviser and going to confessions, I am not going to attend the Church as regularly as I have been (once a day), but probably will alternate Sundays between the Anglican and Roman Catholic churches.

I cannot bend, and will not bend, to a group of articles on the “faith”. I have a feeling that, if things were better explained to me in my own RCIA class, and if I had not been so stubborn, so excited, and so deaf to what they were trying to teach me, I may not have found myself in this painful situation.

Though I would like to, I no longer believe that the Roman Church is the Catholic Church, except in name.

Last Point

Conversations and about a year of soul-searching have gone into this. Many people have been involved in making this decision.

Though you helped show me that my beliefs were contrary to the claimed-“infallible” teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, you did not help me leave it. This I do of my own free will.

Your charity in the matter has been astounding. I thank you for this multi-forum interaction.

God’s blessings.

Paul
Boy is all this complicated.

Pills that have the potential to kill babies= very bad sin, if not committed in ignorance, maybe the worst.

Barriers, 'cides, withdrawal = very bad sin, but at least your not killing your babies

Abortificient properties of ABC are news to most people, including Catholics. Ignore these facts for 20 or so years and the female in the marriage will be infertile anyway.

It takes a while to listen with your head to what the Church teaches. Church teaching (and authority) are extremely difficult to accept because it directly affects your own desires.

When you realize that the Church has studied these things and has been right all along, it softens you up for the rest of her teachings.

If it takes 20 years though, it could be too late and you will miss out on the very best thing about this life.
 
Hi Guy’s

I hope everyone takes time to realize in this thread as many others of same subject the only argument left at the end is “The church says NFP is okay, and the church says the church is the authority for such decisions”
Great observation. Makes the theological debates (Mary’s perpetual virginity, SS, SF, rapture, filioque, confession, etc.)seem almost trivial in comparison, eh?
 
Great observation. Makes the theological debates (Mary’s perpetual virginity, SS, SF, rapture, filioque, confession, etc.)seem almost trivial in comparison, eh?
eh? no
If you truly need we can explain a rational path to the teachings on the other subjects
 
Hi Guy’s

I hope everyone takes time to realize in this thread as many others of same subject the only argument left at the end is “The church says NFP is okay, and the church says the church is the authority for such decisions”
Great observation. Makes the theological debates (Mary’s perpetual virginity, SS, SF, rapture, filioque, confession, etc.)seem almost trivial in comparison, eh?
 
Hi Guy’s

I hope everyone takes time to realize in this thread as many others of same subject the only argument left at the end is “The church says NFP is okay, and the church says the church is the authority for such decisions”
Great observation. Makes the theological debates (Mary’s perpetual virginity, SS, SF, rapture, filioque, confession, etc.)seem almost trivial in comparison, eh?
 
Great observation. Makes the theological debates (Mary’s perpetual virginity, SS, SF, rapture, filioque, confession, etc.)seem almost trivial in comparison, eh?
Great observation. Makes the theological debates (Mary’s perpetual virginity, SS, SF, rapture, filioque, confession, etc.)seem almost trivial in comparison, eh?
Great observation. Makes the theological debates (Mary’s perpetual virginity, SS, SF, rapture, filioque, confession, etc.)seem almost trivial in comparison, eh?
Well, I guess that is one way to get your post count up! 👍
 
Couples using nfp ARE having sex - and doing so while trying to reduce the chance of conception to virtually zero.

They are ‘using each other’ because gratification (whether emotional or physical) is still the goal, just like couples using contraception, just not to the same degree bacause it requires partial (but not complete) abstainence.
 
Couples using nfp ARE having sex - and doing so while trying to reduce the chance of conception to virtually zero.

They are ‘using each other’ because gratification (whether emotional or physical) is still the goal, just like couples using contraception, just not to the same degree bacause it requires partial (but not complete) abstainence.
This appears as an obvious projection of the “taking from” and “using of” that is inherent with ABC onto the “giving to” and “union with” that is inherent with NFP. The qualitative and moral difference between the two approaches are vast and more than simple mechanics.
 
This appears as an obvious projection of the “taking from” and “using of” that is inherent with ABC onto the “giving to” and “union with” that is inherent with NFP. .
well your presuming to know exactly what couples using contraception are thinking or feeling (that they view each other as objects).
 
Sorry I didn’t see this thread earlier. The following web address is for an article about the side effects of contraception, including the medical sources of the information:
onemoresoul.com/contraception-side-effects.php
One method of ABC is the pill. An average of one child is chemically aborted for every year a woman is on the pill. IUD’s also cause early abortions.

I sincerely hope that Paul will reconsider, seeing that the Church has judged rightly on contraception (because She speaks for the God of Life), perhaps he might own that She could be correct in other areas where he disagrees and docilely accept her teachings in spite of his inability to understand, praying for the insight to understand at length. I presume he promised to believe and profess everything that Holy Mother Church proposes for our belief, upon his acceptance into the Church, as I was required to do when I joined the Church 10 years ago. It took me a long, long time to be able to honestly make that pledge. But as soon as I could, by God’s gift of Faith, I experienced a very welcome peace.
May God bless and enlighten Paul with the gift of Faith,
Cathy
 
well your presuming to know exactly what couples using contraception are thinking or feeling (that they view each other as objects).
Subjectively, spouses may be viewing each other as subjects to be loved.

But the morality of human acts includes not only the intention, but the object chosen and the circumstances.

What is the object chosen in this case, and what is its moral evaluation?
 
What a sad thread. It is so sad when someone is guided to the Church by the Holy Spirit, believes it is the true Church so enthusiastically, and then they let something from their previous life that they just can’t let go of rip them away from the Church. I pray that those being drawn to the Church can let go of their pride and put their complete trust in Christ which means trusting in the Church he established to guide us and to which he entrusted the keys to the kingdom. We must approach the kingdom as little Children. It may sound harsh, but no matter how anyone trys to spin it, someone was so attatched to ABC that they chose to cling to it over the Church they believed Christ established. Wasn’t it only about the last 60 years out of 2,000 years of Christianity that any denomination allowed ABC. Yet already some Christians are so attatched to it that they let it be the deciding factor on which Church they believe is the true Church.
 
One of the most popular methods of ABD, “the pill,” causes early abortions: “Ethical side effects: It is estimated that women experience at least one very early abortion for every year that they are on the Pill.2 Both pro-abortion and pro-life groups acknowledge that the Pill causes early abortions.3”
Other ABC methods (with citations from the medical literature)are discussed in the article at this web address:
omsoul.com/contraception-side-effects.php
 
well your presuming to know exactly what couples using contraception are thinking or feeling (that they view each other as objects).
No. ABC by design and meaning (properly understood as an attack against the full mutual giving and union of the marital conjugal act) can only logically and practically result in the objectification of the loved one. Because, if one is not fully giving and fully receiving in the conjugal act, it objectively and inadvertently (independent of subjective feelings/perceptions) defaults to a degree of taking and withholding, which denigrates the natural moral law design of the conjugal act.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top