Contradiction: God's complete kindness vs some in hell forever.

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhoudu
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
And who are we to tell God what he was supposed to do? Only one person ever got to tell God what he was supposed to do. Her name was Mary.

-Tim-
This argument gets made a lot, but it misses the point.

Nobody is telling your god what to do- rather, they are taking two claims “God is X” and “God does Y” and claiming they contradict. If your god were participating in this discussion, I doubt anyone would say “Hey, you need to stop!”
 
Could you please cite a CCC reference for this [the idea that those in hell freely and deliberately chose to be there]?
Sure:
To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called ‘hell. CCC 1033, emphasis mine]
What you’re saying seems to be quite different from the things one usually hears on this matter.
Really? Read Pope St. John Paul the Great’s General Audience (1999-07-28) on this topic.

May I ask where you are getting any contrary information from? Are you getting this from any recognized Catholic authority?
 
May I ask where you are getting any contrary information from? Are you getting this from any recognized Catholic authority?
Many Christians. If you read the threads here you can get plenty of examples of self-identified Christians judging others to hell, regardless of what those people actually know or believe about God.

Many self-identified Christians take for granted that everyone has the necessary and sufficient knowledge about God, and that therefore, everyone will be judged accordingly.
That outlook was common in medieval times, and it seems it hasn’t gone out of fashion.

Such an outlook might not be in line with Catholic doctrine, but it sure has a lot of influence in the world.
 
Such an outlook might not be in line with Catholic doctrine, but it sure has a lot of influence in the world.
I think this largely comes from certain Calvinist (puritan) influences. The Catholic Church has never taught that anyone in hell is there against his free will. Hell is the ultimate exercise of our free will - complete free-will separation from God.

The reason we find it hard to accept the idea that people in hell want to be there is largely related to the imagery of hell as a place of physical pain. Hell isn’t really like that - we have no idea what hell is really like (we can’t even comprehend it). That is an imperfect allegory using familiar themes to describe a place where saints don’t want to be.

The great Anglican author C. S. Lewis wrote an excellent short story called The Great Divorce. The book, which is loosely inspired by Dante’s Divine Comedy, describes a bus ride through hell on the way to heaven. Along the way, the passengers are confronted with temptations which lead them to get off the bus (and not go to heaven). Though not a Catholic, Lewis presents a much more Catholic understanding of hell than you usually hear. It’s well worth four bucks for a Kindle edition.
 
I think this largely comes from certain Calvinist (puritan) influences. The Catholic Church has never taught that anyone in hell is there against his free will. Hell is the ultimate exercise of our free will - complete free-will separation from God.
“Convert/repent before it’s too late!” is a relatively frequent theme commonly heard among Christians.

Googling “Repent before it’s too late!” gives plenty of hits.
The reason we find it hard to accept the idea that people in hell want to be there
I find that it’s hard to accept the idea that people in hell want to be there because the threat of hell is so readily thrown about in popular culture. People get threatened with eternal damantion and little or no attention is payed to what they want or don’t want; what they know or don’t know; as if there is no free will involved, or that free will doesn’t matter. There is just that total, ultimate threat, and nothing else seems to matter.

Being under the influence of popular Christian culture and then on that basis reading the Bible - that can make for a truly grim outlook, as the Bible is full of threats with hell. Many people experience this, and suffer various negative consequences as a result (such as abandoning Christianity altogether, or becoming a fundamentalist). (One more way how sola scriptura can really mess one up.)

Another reason why it can be hard to accept the idea that people in hell want to be there is that, going by popular Christian culture, one apparently must jump through an infinite number of hoops in order to be able to avoid hell. For many people, this is just too depressing, too neurotic, so they reject the whole idea of hell.

Yes, I am talking about “popular Christian culture” because this is the one that actually has much influence in the world.

I am continually amazed as I read the Catechism:
2125 Since it rejects or denies the existence of God, atheism is a sin against the virtue of religion.61 The imputability of this offense can be significantly diminished in virtue of the intentions and the circumstances. "Believers can have more than a little to do with the rise of atheism. To the extent that they are careless about their instruction in the faith, or present its teaching falsely, or even fail in their religious, moral, or social life, they must be said to conceal rather than to reveal the true nature of God and of religion."62
Hell isn’t really like that - we have no idea what hell is really like (we can’t even comprehend it). That is an imperfect allegory using familiar themes to describe a place where saints don’t want to be.
Are you familiar with “The River of Fire”?
/…/
Paradise and hell are one and the same River of God, a loving fire which embraces and covers all with the same beneficial will, without any difference or discrimination. The same vivifying water is life eternal for the faithful and death eternal for the infidels; for the first it is their element of life, for the second it is the instrument of their eternal suffocation; paradise for the one is hell for the other. Do not consider this strange. The son who loves his father will feel happy in his father’s arms, but if he does not love him, his father’s loving embrace will be a torment to him. This also is why when we love the man who hates us, it is likened to pouring lighted coals and hot embers on his head.
Code:
“I say,” writes Saint Isaac the Syrian, “that those who are suffering in hell, are suffering in being scourged by love…. It is totally false to think that the sinners in hell are deprived of God’s love. Love is a child of the knowledge of truth, and is unquestionably given commonly to all. But love’s power acts in two ways: it torments sinners, while at the same time it delights those who have lived in accord with it” (Homily 84).
/…/
In the new eternal life, God will be everything to His creatures, not only to the good but also to the wicked, not only to those who love Him, but likewise to those who hate Him. But how will those who hate Him endure to have everything from the hands of Him Whom they detest? Oh, what an eternal torment is this, what an eternal fire, what a gnashing of teeth!
Code:
Depart from Me, ye cursed, into the everlasting inner fire of hatred,” 47 saith the Lord, because I was thirsty for your love and you did not give it to Me, I was hungry for your blessedness and you did not offer it to Me, I was imprisoned in My human nature and you did not come to visit Me in My church; you are free to go where your wicked desire wishes, away from Me, in the torturing hatred of your hearts which is foreign to My loving heart which knows no hatred for anyone. Depart freely from love to the everlasting torture of hate, unknown and foreign to Me and to those who are with Me, but prepared by freedom for the devil, from the days I created My free, rational creatures. But wherever you go in the darkness of your hating hearts, My love will follow you like a river of fire, because no matter what your heart has chosen, you are and you will eternally continue to be, My children.
The great Anglican author C. S. Lewis wrote an excellent short story called The Great Divorce.
Thank you for the reference. I have some knowledge of Lewis’ work.
 
Think of it this way. Would you allow a complete stranger to come and live in your house with you? Perhaps you might, in an act of charity. But would you allow someone who has constantly ridiculed and insulted you and your work to come and live with you? Or perhaps someone who has robbed and murdered your neighbours?

We each have plenty of time on this planet to work out if we are for or against the concept of God, or whether we wish to entertain the shabby compromise of agnosticism. We cannot complain really. I would imagine children are exempted from this because a) they haven’t had the time to acquire enough knowledge and b) they are innocent.

The Bible is often inconvenient. The truth often is.
The Bible is a mystery and we cannot understand all of it. Which proves it is not the work of a human brain. God fulfils things perfectly. So if the Bible says there was an Ark, then there was an Ark. Evolution works for animals but not humans. Evolution is a continual upward grade. Human existence is a Toblerone.

Best wishes,
Padster
 
I don’t believe those in hell want to be there at all. I do believe they chose to be there as others mentioned but if the separation from God is what causes the pain and God’s continued love for those in hell is what torments the lost souls then it stands to reason that there is regret on the part of the sinner. To such an ugly degree that the sinner now works along side satan to bring more souls to hell . They know God is just and can not remove them from Hell just as he can not deny those who follow the commandments as Jesus instructed to gain heaven.
God loves those in hell and the and although they will not share in the beatific vision, a knowledge of what they lost can result both in regret of what was lost as well as motive to assist satan in his work. No one could possibly want separation from God after standng before him on their judgement day.
Thanks for the river of fire Lucy, good read I’ll have to look at its context a little closer tonight
JA
 
To the OP
God is LOVE, and that is so much more than total kindness.
But love is not to be confused with emotions. It is knowledge and relationship so to speak.
God can’t love you couldn’t love him if you weren’t free to reject him. That free will necessarily and precisely is what forces God to allow you to seperate from him.
It’s harder on him than you!!!
He asked too much of his Son for you to not participate in your salvation and then be injust.
 
I think that the hell is too terrible to be compatible with God’s complete kindness. I used to be a Catholic but now I am not because of this.
First, I think God is not necessarily kind. But I suggest you take another avenue with your critique of hell. I would argue that the notion, that hell is complete separation from God, is completely at odds with God’s omnipresence. So what is our solution? I would argue that hell is, in fact, being in the presence of a God that one has rejected.

This has some serious implications on possibilities. First, it opens up the possibility and hope for universal salvation. Take note, that this in no way is to suggest that hell does not exist. Rather, it is suggest that hell is not permanent. This view isn’t all that novel. Some Church Fathers held this view, namely Origen of Alexandria and Saint Gregory of Nyssa. Some aspects of Origen’s ideas are questionable, such as his notion regarding the preexistence of souls. I suggest you try reading Gregory of Nyssa’s The Life of Moses, which offers a detailed allegorical reading of Exodus and Deuteronomy/Numbers. I believe in this book, he outlines his ideas of universal salvation.

These opinions were respected in the early church. Saint Augustine of Hippo spoke of the beliefs listed above. He said they were permissible and strong in his day, but that he personally disagreed with them.
 
I am confused about Catholic faith. So, I come here to look for the answer. Please help me if you can. Thanks!

According to the Roman Catholic Church, God created the world, in other words, all things except God. And now it is certain that some beings, at least the fallen angels, will remain in big pain in the hell forever. So, I am confused: It seems to be contradictory to God’s complete kindness that he created the world in which some beings will remain in big pain in the hell forever.

God is always completely kind, and he knew what would happen if he created the world before he created the world, since he always knows everything. So, before he created the world, he was supposed to consider the terrible situation carefully and tried to avoid it. There was at least one solution - he just did not create anything. He created the world in complete freedom. And, he created the world not because he needed something from the world, since he always lacks nothing. So, this solution is feasible. And if he had created nothing, it seems that everything is OK. There would be only God, who is completely perfect, completely good and in complete happiness. So, considering that there was at least one solution to the permanent big pain, why have he still let it happen? It seems that this is contradictory to God’s complete kindness.

We may blame the fallen angels and say that their pains are due to their sins. This may be true. However, after all, their permanent big pain is terrible, which God should try to avoid.

So, does anyone have any answer of this? If you have an answer, please tell me. Thanks!
Your question covers alot of ground. I think some reading is in order to adequately answer your question.

Hell exists ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?sufs=0&q=hell&xsubmit=Search&s=SS

predestination exists ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?sufs=0&q=predestination&xsubmit=Search&s=SS

Everything is predestined by God ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?sufs=0&q=predestined&xsubmit=Search&s=SS

God predestines no one to go to hell ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?sufs=0&q=predestines&xsubmit=Search&s=SS

God’s mercy ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?sufs=0&q=god%27s+mercy&xsubmit=Search&s=SS

God’s love ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?sufs=0&q=god%27s+love&xsubmit=Search&s=SS

God’s justice ccc.scborromeo.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?sufs=0&q=god%27s+mercy&xsubmit=Search&s=SS
 
And you will notice that list has something missing:

God’s kindness (defined in the contemporary way of having warm fuzzies in one’s interactions with God)

That’s not an omission on purpose. The contemporary way of defining kindness is wrong.
 
I think that the hell is too terrible to be compatible with God’s complete kindness. I used to be a Catholic but now I am not because of this.
zhoudu, what do believe happens to people when they die? What will happen to you? I skimmed through the posts, but I don’ think you ever posted your opinion (?).
 
zhoudu, what do believe happens to people when they die? What will happen to you? I skimmed through the posts, but I don’ think you ever posted your opinion (?).
I don’t have opinions on these questions. I don’t know their answers. But this doesn’t matter here. Here, I am discussing another question, the contradiction between God and hell, not those questions that you list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top