Converts from Islam

  • Thread starter Thread starter txsoldier94
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ravi Zacharias (and probably other Christians) noted that the Qur’an says that “There is no compulsion in religion” (Qur’an 2:256)

Therefore if there is no compulsion in Islam, then people must freely leave…

Andrew
 
The death penalty for apostasy in Islam is nothing other than a treason law. That’s exactly and only what it is.

You all know I’m sure the Qur’anic injunction that “there is no compulsion in religion.” You cannot force someone to believe. It is not someone’s change of beliefs which is the problem–it is switching sides in a conflict. Remember how Islam involves a system of government? This is part of it.

If there is no Islamic state–and by that I mean khalifa (caliphate)–then there is NO AUTHORITY to implement the death penalty for apostasy.

It is a treason law, and only applies in such cases as the apostasy is equivalent as treason. A Muslim becoming Catholic in America does not fall under this law.
That does not prevent them from being persecuted by Muslims! We had an Iranian who converted after the 9/11 massacre whose real name couldn’t even be released in the papers because of the fear of retaliation from the members of the religion of "peace’! :mad:

Vickie
 
If someone tries to get you to follow another religion,

But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.
 
AgnosTheist what is your opinion on American treason laws? What do you think is the appropriate punishment for treason?
Oh Amy, not you too! How can you buy that garbage? The punishment for treason is death. But then you are saying that you deserve death for leaving your own religion. Or is treason only applicable when the religion is Islam?
 
If there is no Islamic state–and by that I mean khalifa (caliphate)–then there is NO AUTHORITY to implement the death penalty for apostasy.
The problem, for which the penalty is death, is in fact an act of treason and not a mere conversion. It has to be decided upon by a Muslim judge. Most people just don’t understand. It is a treason law. It is Islam’s treason law.
Are you sure? There is no Caliphate today and yet Islamic States like Saudi Arabia still hang people for leaving Islam.

Logically if the muslim camp see it treasonous for someone who leaves islam, then the non-muslim camp should also see it treasonous if someone from their group joins the muslims. Its insane. :eek:
 
Heh…

Islam as politics…could be construed as a vastly different animal than Islam as religion. Which could open a whole 'nother bag o’worms.

Heh…sumtin to ponder.

Mik
 
Heh…

Islam as politics…could be construed as a vastly different animal than Islam as religion. Which could open a whole 'nother bag o’worms.

Heh…sumtin to ponder.

Mik
Another bag of worms maybe… but not I think a vastly different animal. There are way to many Muslims out there who don’t seem to see a distinction between Islam as a religion and Islam as politics. For example, why do Muslims in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt and Syria all care so passionately about the fate of the Palestinians? They appear to care relatively little about the oppression that other groups have experienced around the world during the same time period.


Bill
 
Another bag of worms maybe… but not I think a vastly different animal. There are way to many Muslims out there who don’t seem to see a distinction between Islam as a religion and Islam as politics. For example, why do Muslims in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt and Syria all care so passionately about the fate of the Palestinians? They appear to care relatively little about the oppression that other groups have experienced around the world during the same time period.


Bill
I can tell you that in the case of Iran all of this concern over the Palestinians is internal politics. Ahmadinejad is really pushing this issue to deflect attention away from his problems at home – namely that he cannot deliver on the economic reforms he promised on getting elected. To a person who has to work 3 jobs just to make ends meet in Tehran, the attention given to the Palestinian issue is annoying. Additionally, it is a land issue and on top of that Persians aren’t even Arabs.

Additionally, Ahmadinejad would love nothing more than to keep the nuclear and uranium issue alive as well. The more issues to divert domestic attention away from underliverable election promises, the better.

Pax,
Reader Kevin
 
FaithofAbraham just quoted the Bible and you all missed it.

You all are telling me Saudis are doing this and Pakistanis are doing this and whatever even though there’s no islamic khilafa.

Hello? Aren’t you listening?

Don’t you get it?

What they are doing is wrong. I’m not going to justify it. So stop trying.
 
What they are doing is wrong. I’m not going to justify it. So stop trying.
Im thinking that they have a lot more credibility than you. Afterall they hold mecca. Theologically speaking, its Allah’s will. That makes Saudi Arabia the heart of Islam.

If you cant justify that then its more evidence for you that you landed in the wrong religion. There is too much already that you cant justify. Not this, not sharia, not political islam. its spooky, there is something very wrong with what you have gotten yourself into.
 
Im thinking that they have a lot more credibility than you. Afterall they hold mecca. Theologically speaking, its Allah’s will. That makes Saudi Arabia the heart of Islam.

If you cant justify that then its more evidence for you that you landed in the wrong religion. There is too much already that you cant justify. Not this, not sharia, not political islam. its spooky, there is something very wrong with what you have gotten yourself into.
I didn’t say I can’t. It’s you who are trying to justify it. I’m saying that I WON’T.

The purpose of Shari’ah is to protect 5 things. Life, lineage, property, intellect, and deen. I would prefer to live under Shari’ah law, and hopefully soon enough I will. I believe it is a just system.

But I don’t believe that Saudi Arabia, for example, properly implements, and I don’t believe every JoeSchmoe Muslim who wants to be violent and bases it on Shari’ah when HE is wrong. Neither should you.
 
I didn’t say I can’t. It’s you who are trying to justify it. I’m saying that I WON’T.
Im not justifying the Saudis. Im just saying that they have a much higher religious authority of implementing the proper Islam, the proper sharia. You wont justify them because muslim or not deep in your heart you know they are wrong. What you should ask yourself is, where are you getting your authority from? What right do you have in saying that their intepretation of Islam is wrong and you are right?
I believe it is a just system.
What you have is only a belief, not facts. By now you know several instances where sharia is anything but a just system. Like what we have discussed in the other thread…letting a murderer go for money.

You failed to show any instances in history wherein sharia was implemented in a just manner. In each cases non-muslims were treated like second class citizens.
 
Im not justifying the Saudis. Im just saying that they have a much higher religious authority of implementing the proper Islam, the proper sharia. You wont justify them because muslim or not deep in your heart you know they are wrong.
Duh… didn’t I say that already? What they are doing is wrong?
What you should ask yourself is, where are you getting your authority from? What right do you have in saying that their intepretation of Islam is wrong and you are right?
My two major teachers of Shari’a are my imam who has a degree in Shari’a and Islamic sciences from Syria, and a friend of mine who is in his last semester of a bachelor’s degree program in Shari’a–in Riyadh (that’s in Saudi Arabia.)
What you have is only a belief, not facts. By now you know several instances where sharia is anything but a just system. Like what we have discussed in the other thread…letting a murderer go for money.
I gave you a fatwa about murder. Murder is injustice, and the murderer has rights on him to Allah, to the person he murdered, and to that person’s family. I don’t believe that your personal opinion of justice is greater than Shari’ah–I do believe that Shari’ah is just because this in particular is from God.

What I know about Shari’ah is not just a belief–it is facts. Unfortunately I don’t have law books at my disposal to refer to for you so you are limited to second-hand summaries which I have received from my sheikh, and from my friend.
 
I didn’t say I can’t. It’s you who are trying to justify it. I’m saying that I WON’T.

The purpose of Shari’ah is to protect 5 things. Life, lineage, property, intellect, and deen. I would prefer to live under Shari’ah law, and hopefully soon enough I will. I believe it is a just system.

But I don’t believe that Saudi Arabia, for example, properly implements, and I don’t believe every JoeSchmoe Muslim who wants to be violent and bases it on Shari’ah when HE is wrong. Neither should you.
I wish more Muslims here and in Europe felt the way you do, go to a Muslim country and leave the rest of us alone! Good luck!

Vickie
 
I wish more Muslims here and in Europe felt the way you do, go to a Muslim country and leave the rest of us alone! Good luck!

Vickie
Why? You are proud of a country so vulgar, so laden with crime and decadence, that religious people flee to the desert?
 
Relax, sister. Relax. 🙂
My two major teachers of Shari’a are my imam who has a degree in Shari’a and Islamic sciences from Syria, and a friend of mine who is in his last semester of a bachelor’s degree program in Shari’a–in Riyadh (that’s in Saudi Arabia.)
Thats two imams versus entire nations of muslims. How can you say these two have higher authorities over those whom Allah (religiously speaking) willed as the guardians of Mecca?
I gave you a fatwa about murder. Murder is injustice, and the murderer has rights on him to Allah, to the person he murdered, and to that person’s family. I don’t believe that your personal opinion of justice is greater than Shari’ah–I do believe that Shari’ah is just because this in particular is from God.
now you have little choice but to use ‘God’ in making excuses for your broken islamic policies.

C’mon my dear, we both agree that Murder is injustice. But letting go a murderer in exchange for cash, is there any justice in that? Please dont get emotional, just think about it. 🙂
What I know about Shari’ah is not just a belief–it is facts. Unfortunately I don’t have law books at my disposal to refer to for you so you are limited to second-hand summaries which I have received from my sheikh, and from my friend.
You can ask your friend about this, or better yet have him join here and defend islam.

Now going back to the original topic, how do you reconcile “no compulsion in religion” with the idea that under the caliphate muslims are never allowed to convert to another religion?
 
Why? You are proud of a country so vulgar, so laden with crime and decadence, that religious people flee to the desert?
I am not proud of much of the filth that is spewed forth from Hollywood, nor of much of the Code-Pink, ANSWER, leftist, defeatist, anti-American tripe that is spouted by much of the ivory tower elitists.

But I am proud of the fact that they are free to make fools of themselves in public. I don’t have to agree with it, nor do I have to respect it, just their rights to say/act in that manner.

I am religious, and I seek not to flee from that. That is not what my Lord and Saviour taught. He taught me that I am to be a light in the darkness, and by my words and actions to show others the way to the Truth, so that I might lead others to Him, and He will lead them to His Father for eternity. I cannot be a light and a beacon from the desert.
 
Relax, sister. Relax. 🙂
Why?
Thats two imams versus entire nations of muslims. How can you say these two have higher authorities over those whom Allah (religiously speaking) willed as the guardians of Mecca?
This is kind of silly, really. It’s not two “imams” versus nations. It is SCHOLARS agains RULERS. The scholars have the knowledge, while the rulers act with their corruption and prevent the scholars from teaching the laypeople any better.
now you have little choice but to use ‘God’ in making excuses for your broken islamic policies.
Not making excuses.
C’mon my dear, we both agree that Murder is injustice. But letting go a murderer in exchange for cash, is there any justice in that? Please dont get emotional, just think about it. 🙂
I did think about it. I DO think that a man might commit murder without being a serial killer, without being a further danger to society, and I do believe what Jesus said–that forgiveness is important. And I do believe that JUSTICE is set by God–and if that means allowing the victim’s family to set the punishment or pardon it, then such is justice. Yes.
You can ask your friend about this, or better yet have him join here and defend islam.
He’s busy writing a research paper on how husbands are supposed to live in good relations with their wives according to Shari’ah.
Now going back to the original topic, how do you reconcile “no compulsion in religion” with the idea that under the caliphate muslims are never allowed to convert to another religion?
By the fact that apostasy has to be judged by a Muslim judge in a Muslim state and satisfy certain conditions before the death penalty is applied.
 
I didn’t say I can’t. It’s you who are trying to justify it. I’m saying that I WON’T.

The purpose of Shari’ah is to protect 5 things. Life, lineage, property, intellect, and deen. I would prefer to live under Shari’ah law, and hopefully soon enough I will. I believe it is a just system.

But I don’t believe that Saudi Arabia, for example, properly implements, and I don’t believe every JoeSchmoe Muslim who wants to be violent and bases it on Shari’ah when HE is wrong. Neither should you.
Shari’ah might be a just system, but I have seen little evidence of it. Perhaps it is the manner it which it is implemented, but when it seems to be implemented in oppressive fashions time and again, one does have to wonder. I still remember a case where a mother was to be stoned because she was an adulteress but the the father of her child was exonerated because he had friends willing to say he was innocent.

Ultimately, even God’s law can be administered unjustly. Any system we have on Earth must recognize human weakness in the equation. Shari’ah as it is currently administered, by judges and courts that are answerable to no authority but themselves cannot help but be enforced unjustly.


Bill
 
I would prefer to live under Shari’ah law, and hopefully soon enough I will. I believe it is a just system.
May you get your wish…but not here. We want no part of Sharia. I would suggest that you go to a country that supposedly practices Sharia and try to reform it from within…but then I would not want you to be imprisoned/raped/tortured/stoned/beheaded for daring to stand up for your rights as a woman.

In reality, there is no such thing as a just government. Government is a parasitic entity. The only hope for government is for the people to have the freedoms to make changes in government and to strive to limit its control over every aspect of our lives.

No matter how just you feel Sharia law is in concept, it will never be enacted justly, because people are flawed and have been ever since the disobedience of Adam and Eve.

Mik
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top