T
ThomasMT
Guest
A sobering discussion on a seemingly counterintuitive measure.
Last edited:
Masses were cancelled and churches and schools were closed for 100 plus days during the Spanish flu in 1918-1919. It was these measures of eliminating public gatherings that made the difference in infection and death rates from community to community. There are actual studies done that prove this. Here’s one.You may not like it, yet there is little that you can say to dispute the validity of concerns being expressed.
And yet not as slanderous and unauthoritative as what those characters were speaking. . . .You have no authority to assert that as anything more than an slandering opinion.
If nothing else, Dr. Marshall holds respectable academic credentials and accomplishments. Yet he has less authority than you? . . .And yet not as slanderous and unauthoritative as what those characters were speaking.
You said that you turned it off as soon as you heard something you didn’t like so…Their ideology sounds like Scientology telling people not to listen to medical authorities because their faith in Scientology is all they need.
Big problem: where will you get the priests? Around here there can be two or three parishes per priest.There is an alternative that I have seen proposed that instead of no Masses there should be more Masses. If more Masses were celebrated fewer people could attend each and be more spread out in church.
Yes, but, those priests to which you refer exist. They could offer more Masses than now. Diocesan bishops can give permission for a priest to exceed the permitted number of Masses. I am sure there will be a Mass among the votive Masses called ‘Masses for Various Needs and Occasions’ that would be very appropriate for this time.Big problem: where will you get the priests? Around here there can be two or three parishes per priest.