T
TrueLight
Guest
Oh wow.The annotation in the Rheims New Testament is as follows:
27)
I chastise: The goal of everlasting glory is not promised nor set forth for faith-only men, for such run at random, but it is the prize of them that chastise and subdue their bodies and fleshly desires by fasting, watching, voluntary poverty, and other afflictions. Lord, how far is the carnal doctrine of the sectarians and the manners of these days from the Apostle’s spirit. Wherein even we that be Catholics, though we do not condemn with the protestants these voluntary afflictions as superstitious (much less as superstitious or injurious to Christ’s death) but much commend them, yet we use nothing of the zeal and diligence of our first Christian ancestors herein, and therefore are like to be more subject to God’s temporal chastisements, at the least in the next life, than they were.
Left perhaps: Here may we lambs tremble (saith a holy father) when the ram, the guide of the flock, must so labor and punish himself (besides all his other miseries adjoined to the preaching of the Gospel) lest perhaps he miss the mark. A man might think St. Paul should be as sure and as confident of God’s grace & salvation as we poor wretched captives, but the heretic’s unhappy security, presumption, and faithless persuasion of their salvation is not fides apostolorum but fides daemoniorum, not the faith of the apostles, but the faith of devils.
Thanks for the info.
Is that what the commentaries are like in that Bible? The language seems a little too poetic for an annotation.
There is actual commentary about “the protestants?”