Corruption in Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kamalayka
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
K

Kamalayka

Guest
Third and the Last message given to Sister Agnes Sasagawa on October 13, 1973:

“The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres (other priests). Churches and altars will be sacked. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.”

“The demon will be especially implacable against the souls consecrated to God. The thought of the loss of so many souls is the cause of my sadness. If sins increase in number and gravity, there will be no longer pardon for them.”
 
What is bothering me, is not the truth of that, but why the real “prevention” isn’t being addressed. And if it isn’t being prevented, regardless of attempts, what is that really telling us?
 
Third and the Last message given to Sister Agnes Sasagawa on October 13, 1973:

“The work of the devil will infiltrate even into the Church in such a way that one will see cardinals opposing cardinals, bishops against other bishops. The priests who venerate me will be scorned and opposed by their confreres (other priests). Churches and altars will be sacked. The Church will be full of those who accept compromises and the demon will press many priests and consecrated souls to leave the service of the Lord.”

“The demon will be especially implacable against the souls consecrated to God. The thought of the loss of so many souls is the cause of my sadness. If sins increase in number and gravity, there will be no longer pardon for them.”
Maybe I am reading this incorrectly, but I do not believe it is a teaching of the Church that the number and gravity of sins can be so great that there is no pardon for them. The only sin for which there is no pardon is Blashphemy against the Holy Spirit, which is actually final impenitence. The above statement makes it sound as if God is getting so disgusted with the increasing sinfulness of the world that He is going to withold pardon. Now, the number and gravity of one’s sin can increase to the point where one no longer cares and the result is final impenitence, but no matter how many sins have been committed and no matter how bad they are, there is always forgiveness and pardon offered to those who repent. However, I am certain that God is greatly grieved over the increasing sinfulness of the world, and the first part of the message seems to be playing out. It is that last statement that is confusing to me. No pardon for sin? No. No pardon for unrepented sin–yes. What actualy is being said here?
 
Maybe I am reading this incorrectly, but I do not believe it is a teaching of the Church that the number and gravity of sins can be so great that there is no pardon for them. The only sin for which there is no pardon is Blashphemy against the Holy Spirit, which is actually final impenitence…No pardon for sin? No. No pardon for unrepented sin–yes. What actualy is being said here?
Remember this is a transcript from a private revelation. An approved one, but still a PR. So it can be taken with a grain of salt.
What is bothering me, is not the truth of that, but why the real “prevention” isn’t being addressed. And if it isn’t being prevented, regardless of attempts, what is that really telling us?
What is the “real prevention” do you think?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top