D
dje101
Guest
Hello,
I hear this somewhere, but I can’t remember where. Basically, the individual was talking about how baptism can be administered by the laity in an emergency situation and that even an athiest could baptize someone if the person being baptized wanted it and it was done in proper form. The reasoning being that the validity or effectiveness of the baptism is not necessarily dependent on the person baptizing because it is for the benefit of the person being baptized.
Is this correct?
Thanks.
I hear this somewhere, but I can’t remember where. Basically, the individual was talking about how baptism can be administered by the laity in an emergency situation and that even an athiest could baptize someone if the person being baptized wanted it and it was done in proper form. The reasoning being that the validity or effectiveness of the baptism is not necessarily dependent on the person baptizing because it is for the benefit of the person being baptized.
Is this correct?
Thanks.