No offense, but I think this is what it boils down to: politics and money. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t fault you, but that’s what it boils down to: what happens with the money.
No, my talking about the money is simply bringing the productivity of a non-celibate priesthood into play. In heory it may sound grand (though for me, it doesn’t) but in practice it simply does not.
Well, I don’t know how the EC or the Rabbi’s make it work, but obviously it works as they’ve been doing it just fine. If you’re curious enough about it, ask on the EO forum…
How do you know that they’ve been doing it just fine if you don’t know how it works?

I googled it but it had no informative responses.
Again, you have the right to your opinion, and if you feel you would like to go into the priesthood and can’t handle a wife and children being part of it, then you certainly should remain single. But to say that having a wife and children makes a priest incompetent is not fair to the examples in the EC and Jewish communities.
What I am saying is that the pros of a celibate Priesthood outnumber the cons.
In my opinion a celibate priest is better off than a non-celibate priest.
However, I do not just base my reasons off of opinion, no. Most of what I say (save the parts of “money and politics”) are based off Church teaching as confirmed in the
Encyclical Sacerdotalis Caelibatus.
To quote the Encyclical:
Sacerdotalis Caelibatus(Paul VI):
Christ, the only Son of the Father, by the power of the Incarnation itself was made Mediator between heaven and earth, between the Father and the human race. Wholly in accord with this mission, Christ remained throughout His whole life in the state of celibacy, which signified His total dedication to the service of God and men. This deep concern between celibacy and the priesthood of Christ is reflected in those whose fortune it is to share in the dignity and mission of the Mediator and eternal Priest; this sharing will be more perfect the freer the sacred minister is from the bonds of flesh and blood.
This, I quoted, because I feel it is important. I feel it is the most persuasive out of all the reasons listed in the Encyclical.
I don’t mind you being gruff. Your opinion is your opinion and mine is mine. I think it’s a shame that 95 percent of the high school seminary preparatory students that I knew while growing up decided not to pursue the seminary because they wanted families, my brother included. In fact, my brother talked about converting to EC and getting married, and becoming a priest that way. He never followed through with that. I think he felt odd being a different religion than my mom, and I think that’s the only reason why he didn’t follow through. I wish he would have done that. I hope that RC priests have that opportunity and would welcome it. I do think they will in the future, it’s just a matter of time. Some people will be upset about it and some will celebrate it: just like anything else.
It will not happen. The more time celibacy has confirms its future. To go back on the Church’s pronouncement of the discipline would not be good, and would instead compromise the over 1,000 years of a celibate priesthood. In otherwords, once you go celibate, there is no going back. If your brother was discerning the priesthood and went with marriage instead - fine. I suppose God just didn’t want him as a Priest. That is what discernment is for.
Hypothetically speaking, why shouldn’t we have a Polygamist priesthood as well? I mean, Moses had many wives, David had many wives, they all had plenty of wives, why can’t Priests? Infact, if the Church doesn’t adopt a Polygamist Priesthood, I’m converting to Islam so I can be a polygamist Imam. Now obviously that all sounds absurd, and I hope you get my comparison. We have to draw the line somewhere. And that some things just aren’t compatible with the Priesthood in the Latin Rite.