H
HopkinsReb
Guest
Iirc, hell was just tiny, fitting easily between blades of grass. The travel primarily involved them getting bigger.
This type of feeling is incompatible with Heaven. The communion of saints enjoy the Beatific Vision, which you are underestimating. The soul is transformed and not capable of such resentment.how heaven could be unbearable for certain people. For example if you had not forgiven those who had committed terrible crimes in this life and then you had to spend eternity with them
Correct. Lewis said in the forward that he borrowed that idea of travel from a science-fiction writer — an American, I think, whom he didn’t name.Iirc, hell was just tiny, fitting easily between blades of grass. The travel primarily involved them getting bigger.
Again this type of thing is incompatible with Heaven. I rest my case. If you want to believe your scenario, fine, I don’t.if you have brothers whom you have not forgiven
You’d want to make sure you had a good choir.Maybe Heaven is mass for all eternity, Heaven to some, and Hell to others.
Well, the point of The Great Divorce is not to show what Heaven and Hell are like, but rather to suggest why some people go to one place and others to the other. Lewis is trying to show why the lost would choose to remain lost even when salvation is offered to them. His depictions of Heaven and Hell are meant only to suggest to the reader the states in which their inhabitants dwell; they are not meant to be eyewitness reports of what we can expect to find in the hereafter.So don’t imagine anything which is unimaginable to human mind and unnecessarily waste time.
That is explained in Qur’an and Hadiths. I am not Christians and no much aware of Bible. Just those verses:What are your biblical justifications of your personal stance, along with any Church teaching please.
There are metaphor in verses. We cannot take meaning literaly.I appreciate your response. We have already contemplated that verse in this thread. I’ll share something with you from this thread.
And another angel, a third, followed them, saying with a loud voice, “If any one worships the beast and its image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, he also shall drink the wine of God’s wrath, poured unmixed into the cup of his anger, and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb . And the smoke of their torment goes up for ever and ever ; and they have no rest, day or night, these worshipers of the beast and its image, and whoever receives the mark of its name.”
Revelation 14:9-11
Notice they are tormented in the presence of God. God resides in heaven.
Also the Catholic Catechism defines heaven as a “State of Being”.
What do you think about that verse in Revalation? Does heaven have to be physical in the human sense? Could the verse you provided refer to physicality symbolically?
There is the same concept in the West.I think there was a couple Fathers who held this idea and it has become quite popular among Eastern Catholic and Orthodox Christians in modern time. Basically the idea is that the fire of God’s love blissfully transfigures those who are open to it and turned toward God and torments those who cling to their sins, turned away from God.
I don’t think there is anything wrong with this idea, as long as we acknowledge the permanence of it.