D
daler
Guest
Daler, I think you are proselytizing.![]()
Forgive me If I seem to be judgmental;just my thoughts only
MJ
Oh… ;-( Sorry MJ It was not my intention.
Daler, I think you are proselytizing.![]()
Forgive me If I seem to be judgmental;just my thoughts only
MJ
Oh… ;-( Sorry MJ It was not my intention.
Nope. Read the bible Jesus tells us whoever tell a different gospel is not of the One True God.Is it possible that Muhammad was a prophet of God? Can the belief in Jesus as our savoir and Muhammad as a prophet coincide? I don’t know much about Islam, but I’m quite curious about it.
Does not matter. Rather he teaches some truth does not make one a Prophet from God.Maybe the question, if accurately worded, would say, “In the views of Christianity, could Muhammad have been a prophet?” Some non-Christian believers in God regard Muhammad as a prophet, so the answer is “Yes”.
Islam emphasizes that there is only one God, and it is impossible for God to have been incarnated.
The statement, “God does not sent prophets to teach against the truth of Jesus’ nature.” may not hold water for faiths that do not believe in the Trinity, and that includes many Christian faiths.
Here is why I believe it happened.I never understood how millions of people could come to believe someone who claimed he was a prophet, when there was no way of authenticating that he was truly visited by an angel, i.e., there were no such witnesses to such an event (conveniently so). And then compare this to Jesus, who came at a time when Jews were awaiting the messiah, fulfilled all the prophecies indicated in Holy Scripture, and had the witnesses to prove it.
From being honest and a Christian all of my life I can see where you have a Problem with when the word becomes flesh.I personally don’t have a problem with calling Jesus the son of God in the content of Judaism, but I do have a problem with calling him the son of God in the context of Christianity.
From being honest and a Christian all of my life I can see where you have a Problem with when the word becomes flesh.
God is 3 Persons in One Being.
He is the Father.
The Son
and the Holy Spirit.
It is indeed a true mystery of God that he has not quite revealed to even us.
I can truly understand you not understanding the mystery because as Christians we struggle to explain it. Honestly we can’t.
And I know the Holy Spirit in my heart.
All stem to him and the Church being One. Its quite a riddle on the brain. I will give you that. But it is through his Holy Spirit and much Grace given to you by him through his Holy Spirit that you can accept it.
Pray to the One True God for Grace. That is the best advice anyone can every give you.
There is a way of analogy which works quite well in understanding this relationship.rinnie You have stated the mystery very well here. Thank you.
"Views on sexualityI’m not sure what your specific reference is with St Augustine?
Raming is not a Catholic theologian:"Views on sexuality
For Augustine, the evil of sexual immorality was not in the sexual act itself, but rather in the emotions that typically accompany it. In **On Christian Doctrine **Augustine contrasts love, which is enjoyment on account of God, and lust, which is not on account of God.[119] For Augustine, proper love exercises a denial of selfish pleasure and the subjugation of corporeal desire to God. He wrote that the pious virgins raped during the sack of Rome, were innocent because they did not intend to sin.[120][121]
Augustine’s view of sexual feelings as sinful affected his view of women. For example he considered a man’s erection to be sinful, though involuntary,[122] because it did not take place under his conscious control. His solution was to place controls on women to limit their ability to influence men.[123] Augustine viewed women not only as threatening to men, but also as intellectually and morally inferior.[124] He equated flesh with woman and spirit with man.[125]
He believed that the serpent approached Eve because she was less rational and lacked self-control, while Adam’s choice to eat was viewed as an act of kindness so that Eve would not be left alone.[123] Augustine believed sin entered the world because man (the spirit) did not exercise control over woman (the flesh).[126] .
According to Raming, the authority of the Decretum Gratiani, a collection of Roman Catholic canon law which prohibits women from leading, teaching, or being a witness, rests largely on the views of the early church fathers—one of the most influential being St. Augustine, the Bishop of Hippo.[127] The laws and traditions founded upon St. Augustine’s views of sexuality and women continue to exercise considerable influence over church doctrinal positions regarding the role of women in the church.[128]
This is “opinion” and not the same one I share. Where specifically does this arrive from in Augustines work?"Views on sexuality
For Augustine, the evil of sexual immorality was not in the sexual act itself, but rather in the emotions that typically accompany it. In **On Christian Doctrine **Augustine contrasts love, which is enjoyment on account of God, and lust, which is not on account of God.[119] For Augustine, proper love exercises a denial of selfish pleasure and the subjugation of corporeal desire to God. He wrote that the pious virgins raped during the sack of Rome, were innocent because they did not intend to sin.[120][121]
Augustine’s view of sexual feelings as sinful affected his view of women. For example he considered a man’s erection to be sinful, though involuntary,[122] because it did not take place under his conscious control. His solution was to place controls on women to limit their ability to influence men.[123] Augustine viewed women not only as threatening to men, but also as intellectually and morally inferior.[124] He equated flesh with woman and spirit with man.[125]
He believed that the serpent approached Eve because she was less rational and lacked self-control, while Adam’s choice to eat was viewed as an act of kindness so that Eve would not be left alone.[123] Augustine believed sin entered the world because man (the spirit) did not exercise control over woman (the flesh).[126] .
According to Raming, the authority of the Decretum Gratiani, a collection of Roman Catholic canon law which prohibits women from leading, teaching, or being a witness, rests largely on the views of the early church fathers—one of the most influential being St. Augustine, the Bishop of Hippo.[127] The laws and traditions founded upon St. Augustine’s views of sexuality and women continue to exercise considerable influence over church doctrinal positions regarding the role of women in the church.[128]
Try the following:I’m not sure what your specific reference is with St Augustine?
119.^ Augustine of Hippo, On Christian Doctrine, 3.37
120.^ Russell, Bertrand. (1945) A History of Western Philosophy, Simon & Schuster. p. 356.
121.^ Augustine of Hippo, City of God, Book I, Ch. 16, 18.
122.^ Augustine of Hippo, City of God, 14.17
123.^ a b Reuther, R.R. (2007). “Augustine: sexuality gender and women”, pp. 47–68 in J.C. Stark (Ed.), Feminist interpretations of Augustine, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, ISBN 027103257X.
124.^ Augustine of Hippo, Questions on the Heptateuch, Book I, § 153, as cited at Women were considered Inferior Creatures. womenpriests.org
125.^ Augustine of Hippo, as cited in Trombley, C. (2003). Who said women can’t teach? God’s vision for women in ministry. Gainesville, FL: Bridge-Logos, p. 239, ISBN 1458796329
GaryTaylor;10987230:
Saint Augustine “On christian Doctrine, in four books” couldn’t find what you wrote related to women , probably you took it from the interpretation of Augustine writings, one that is not made by a catholic as I mentionedGaryTaylor;10990392:
Try the following:
119.^ Augustine of Hippo, On Christian Doctrine, 3.37
120.^ Russell, Bertrand. (1945) A History of Western Philosophy, Simon & Schuster. p. 356.
121.^ Augustine of Hippo, City of God, Book I, Ch. 16, 18.
122.^ Augustine of Hippo, City of God, 14.17
123.^ a b Reuther, R.R. (2007). “Augustine: sexuality gender and women”, pp. 47–68 in J.C. Stark (Ed.), Feminist interpretations of Augustine, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, ISBN 027103257X.
124.^ Augustine of Hippo, Questions on the Heptateuch, Book I, § 153, as cited at Women were considered Inferior Creatures. womenpriests.org
125.^ Augustine of Hippo, as cited in Trombley, C. (2003). Who said women can’t teach? God’s vision for women in ministry. Gainesville, FL: Bridge-Logos, p. 239, ISBN 1458796329
Your referece list only suggest these are cites from Augustine, but they are not. Normally you write the author first then his article/book, and then anything that might give an insight about the cinnection…
GaryTaylor;10987230:
Right, for example 121 and 122 since I have the book handy.GaryTaylor;10990392:
Try the following:
119.^ Augustine of Hippo, On Christian Doctrine, 3.37
120.^ Russell, Bertrand. (1945) A History of Western Philosophy, Simon & Schuster. p. 356.
121.^ Augustine of Hippo, City of God, Book I, Ch. 16, 18.
122.^ Augustine of Hippo, City of God, 14.17
123.^ a b Reuther, R.R. (2007). “Augustine: sexuality gender and women”, pp. 47–68 in J.C. Stark (Ed.), Feminist interpretations of Augustine, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press, ISBN 027103257X.
124.^ Augustine of Hippo, Questions on the Heptateuch, Book I, § 153, as cited at Women were considered Inferior Creatures. womenpriests.org
125.^ Augustine of Hippo, as cited in Trombley, C. (2003). Who said women can’t teach? God’s vision for women in ministry. Gainesville, FL: Bridge-Logos, p. 239, ISBN 1458796329
121 1-16 is on the violation of the consecrated and other Christian virgins, to which they were subject to captivity, and to which their own will gave no consent. He speaks of lust gratified by the body of another who is unwilling.
1-18 continuation of above in relation to the assaulted.
122 14-17 Relates to the original fall and Augustine calls it “pride” and correctly. Genesis III-12, 13 he elaborates on.
Its much easier to read what the Saint stated, then what another suggests in opinion is being said.
In the seven century CE, there were no codified laws, thus being called a murderer, slaver, torturer and pedophile for his actions is based on modern morals. According to the standards of that day, when an army conquered a people, no prisoners were taken. The conquered soldiers were killed and the women and children taken as slaves. The fact that Mohammad’s favorite wife Aisha was a young adolescent was normal for that time.No, he was a Criminal worse than Hitler, Stalin and Mao combined.
A Murderer, Slaver, Torturer and Pedophile…
This is one of the pitfalls for a man making up a religion where he pretends to be something he’s not, sadly.In the seven century CE, there were no codified laws, thus being callet a murderer, slaver, torturer and pedophile for his actions is based or modern morals. According to the standards of that day, when an army conquered a people, no prisoners were taken. The conquered soldiers were killed and the women and children taken as slaves. The fact that Mohammad’s favorite wife Aisha was a young adolescent was normal for that time.
This is going under my, “favorite quotes of all time” list.The Mohammeds, David Ickes and Joseph Smiths of this world do not compare to the real deal our Lord Jesus Christ, Whose life and example ring true now 2000 years later and will do so in another 2000, 10000 or however long we last.
Jews are the “Chosen People” with a long tradition and have never placed much emphasis on conversions. Even today, Jews marrying Gentiles is discouraged in some circles because it introduces non-Judaic elements into this strongly protected ethnicity and tradition. Have you seen “Fiddler on the Roof?”What are the differences between muslim and judaic practices/beliefs? Muslims say they are right because they were so successful converting other people…
looks like a simplified judaism…Jews are the “Chosen People” with a long tradition and have never placed much emphasis on conversions. Even today, Jews marrying Gentiles is discouraged in some circles because it introduces non-Judaic elements into this strongly protected ethnicity and tradition. Have you seen “Fiddler on the Roof?”
For Jews, the Torah is supreme. It is worshipped as the most sacred element in the synagogue. The Torah is the Law, and by tradition, was written by Moses.
Jews place great emphasis on the history of the Israelites, which enters into their religious services.
Islam got started as an effort to unite the warring Arab tribes into a unified nation called an “ummah”. The Quran is the holy scripture and is said to have been revealed to Muhammad gradually over a period of 23 years. Muslims must follow the five principles of faith:
1.Shahadah (belief or confession of faith) (there is only one God and his name is Al-Lah)
2.Salat (worship in the form of prayer) (five times per day)
3.Sawm Ramadan (fasting during the month of Ramadan)
4.Zakat (alms or charitable giving)
5.Hajj (the pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in a lifetime.[5][6])
The fact that Islam spread over a vast area of the Middle East over a period of 100 years is due less to religion and more to political ambition of the caliphs. At first, conquered people were able to practice their own religion. However only Muslims were first class citizens. If a non-Muslim wanted the privileges of a Muslim, he converted.